Despite state-organised rallies in support of Muammar Gaddaffi, thousands of pro-democracy protesters defy a security crackdown to demand an end to his 42-year rule. Videos posted online claim to show demonstrators setting fire to the police headquarters in the eastern city of Benghazi. Al Jazeera speaks to an eyewitness who describes seeing protesters shot dead by Gaddaffi loyalists.
Continue reading …[WARNING: This video contains images that some viewers may find disturbing] Troops and tanks have locked down the Bahraini capital of Manama after riot police swinging clubs and firing tear gas smashed into demonstrators in a pre-dawn assault, killing at least four people. Hours after the attack on Manama’s main Pearl Roundabout, the military announced a ban on gatherings, saying on state TV that it had “key parts” of the capital under its control. Khalid Al Khalifa, Bahrain’s foreign minister, justified the crackdown as necessary because the demonstrators were “polarising the country” and pushing it to the “brink of the sectarian abyss”. Speaking to reporters after meeting with his Gulf counterparts, he also said the violence was “regrettable”. Two people had died in police firing on the protesters prior to Thursday’s deadly police raid. An Al Jazeera correspondent, who cannot be named for security reasons, went to Salmaniya hospital, which was thrown into chaos by a stream of wounded protesters from Pearl Roundabout.
Continue reading …Banks and hedge funds in London are coming under increasing scrutiny over their practice of speculating on food prices. The allegation is that financial institutions are buying up vast stocks of food, thereby forcing prices to rise. This comes as food costs are increasing the world over. And as the revolt in Tunisia and other countries has shown, there is a social price to pay for this kind of rise. Al Jazeera’s Laurence Lee reports.
Continue reading …Even though cable news shows and political pundits swoon all over NJ Gov. Chris Christie, Dean Baker is exactly right : Christie displays “follow-ship”, not leadership. He is completely a creature of the Republican establishment . Yet he likes to paint himself as a regular guy and even an outsider. “Outsider”? Don’t make me laugh. At yesterday’s speech at the American Enterprise Institute, Christie said he’d never been to Trenton until he was elected governor. (As the nuns would say, “That was a bold, brazen lie!” ) Married to an investment banker, he worked as a securities lawyer and then as a statehouse lobbyist representing the Securities Industry Association, Wall Street’s trade association. Appointed as a U.S. Attorney with no prosecutorial experience , his appointment was approved by Karl Rove because Christie, his stockbroker brother Todd and their wives donated a half-million dollars to Bush’s campaign. Todd also spread some cash compost around the Republican Governor’s Association, which used to money to run ads supporting Christie’s gubernatorial race. Oh yeah. About Todd: He was one of 20 specialist stock traders charged with civil fraud for cheating customers. Funny thing, though: 14 of those traders were also charged criminally, many for lesser infractions than Todd Christie. But we can rest easy, since Gov. Christie assures us his brother got no special treatment — even though he awarded a lucrative, no-bid state contract to the federal attorney who investigated his brother after his brother was cleared. Christie insists there was no connection, and I’m sure he wouldn’t lie, right? You got a problem with that? POLITICO’s blog, The Arena , recently asked: In a Wednesday afternoon speech at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington D.C., New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie called for raising the retirement age on Social Security. His willingness to tackle politically delicate entitlement programs follows his approach in New Jersey of taking on teachers’ unions and other groups. Can Christie portray himself as a teller of difficult truths and become a credible White House candidate in 2012 or 2016? Or will his YouTube-friendly shtick soon wear thin and render him largely irrelevant in Democratic-leaning New Jersey? The fact that Gov. Christie is willing to do whatever Wall Street and the elite media tell him does not suggest that he has strong leadership qualities. If he had strong leadership qualities, he might take a moment to look at the Social Security trustees report himself, or at least talk to someone who had. He would discover that the program can pay 100 percent of all scheduled benefits through the year 2037 and nearly 80 percent of scheduled benefits after this date for the indefinite future. After 2037 retirees would always get a larger benefit than current retirees even if Congress never does anything. If Mr. Christie did the sort of basic research that we would expect from someone proposing to raise the retirement age he would discover that nearly half of older workers work in physically demanding jobs. It will be difficult for these people to stay in these positions well into their sixties. The share of non-college grads in physically demanding jobs is close to 60 percent. He would also discover that that there has been relatively little increase in life expectancy for workers in the bottom half of the wage distribution, so further increases in the retirement age (we just raised it from 65 to 67) would likely mean a shorter period of retirement for low and moderate income workers. Christie would also discover that most middle income workers have almost nothing besides Social Security to support themselves in retirement. This is due to the fact that they don’t have traditional pensions, never accumulated much money in 401(k)s and just saw much of their home equity disappear with the collapse of the housing bubble. Unfortunately Mr. Christie shows little interest in learning about Social Security, the country’s most important safety net program. He just wants to do what the Washington Post tells him. That probably means he is electable, but that doesn’t suggest he will be a very good president.
Continue reading …On Thursday's CBS Early Show, senior White House correspondent Bill Plante seized on a rare instance in which the Obama administration and conservative members of Congress happened to agree on a single budget cut: “It's not very often that the Obama administration finds itself on the same side as Tea Party Republicans when it comes to spending.” The spending in question was funding for the production of jet engines for F-35 fighter aircraft. As Plante described it: “Defense Secretary Gates and the President say it's not necessary. And so do fiscal conservatives.” He also noted that cancelling the project was “a defeat for House Speaker John Boehner….Part of it would have been made in his district.” The on-screen headline read: “Budget Battle; GOP Fiscal Hawks Torpedo Boehner Pet Project.” News reader Jeff Glor introduced Plante's report by claiming the cut was “a budget win for the President.” Neither Glor nor Plante described it as win for the Tea Party or conservatives.
Continue reading …Click here to view this media We’re already accustomed to Bill O’Reilly’s standard MO when it comes to polls: If it makes Democrats and/or President Obama look bad, he shouts it to the skies. If it makes Republicans look bad, he simply doesn’t believe it and declares the poll methodologically faulty. And so it was no surprise when, given the recent polling demonstrating that a majority of Republican primary voters are suckers for the Birther conspiracy theories, O’Reilly last night flatly declared the polls wrong: O’REILLY: And in the “Impact” segment tonight, new poll by a Democratic organization says 51 percent of Republican primary voters believe President Obama was not born in the USA. I do not believe that poll. And here’s the reason. The sample is so minuscule, very few people vote in Republican primaries. And to isolate them would be a challenge even for Gallup, much less a political polling center. So, here is a better poll. According to CBS news, 58 percent of Americans believe the President was born in America, just 20 percent say he was born in another country. The rest don’t seem to care. There is no question that some Democrats are trying to marginalize Republican opposition in 2012 by painting them as nuts, thus the birther polling. Right — because a a poll surveying all Americans is going to be just like a poll surveying Republican primary voters, eh? Er, not exactly. Indeed, O’Reilly just unintentionally highlighted the stark differences between your average Tea Partying-Obama-hating-liberal-smacking Republican voter and the average sane, normal, decent American. And then he brought on Karl Rove, who then declared that this whole Birther conspiracy theory was concocted by the Obama White House as a way to ensnare poor unwitting wingnuts in the “trap” of John Birth Society-esque conspiracy theories. No, really, that’s what he said: O’REILLY: OK, so, there is no doubt in my mind after watching Gregory on “Meet the Press” on Sunday, grilling Speaker Boehner about the birth certificate and all of that that the liberal and Gregory is a liberal man, right? I’m not being unfair to him, am I? KARL ROVE: No. O’REILLY: OK. He may not acknowledge it but he is. So, it’s divide — let’s divide the Republican Party. ROVE: This is a White House strategy. They love this. O’REILLY: How do you know it’s the White House strategy? ROVE: Look, the President could come out and say, ‘Here are the documents.’ They are happy to have this controversy continue because every moment the conservatives talk about this they marginalize themselves and diminish themselves in the minds of independent voters. And every moment we spend talking about this controversy is a moment we can’t spend talking about the failed stimulus bill, the reckless spending, Obamacare, his failures in foreign policy and his failure to live up to the promises that he made in the 2008 election. Look, he was born in Hawaii. If he was born in Kenya, then there must have been some massive conspiracy that said this guy being born in Kenya — O’REILLY: The Factor already did the investigation and we — (CROSSTALK) ROVE: You know, birth notices in both Honolulu newspapers. Got that? Even though the White House has produced a real birth certificate, the kind every person born in Hawaii uses to prove their citizenship, Rove thinks that somehow the “complete” certificate on file somewhere in Hawaii will change the Birthers’ minds and convince them Obama was born in the USA. Right. And that furthermore, the refusal to produce said certificate is actually a plot by the White House to make Republicans look like wacky conspiracy theorists of the John Birch Society mold: O’REILLY: Ok. Now, there is though and you saw it at CPAC last week in Washington, D.C. — there is an element of the Republican Party that’s far right and that really loves this kind of discourse. ROVE: The campaign for liberty types who are there for Ron Paul. O’REILLY: Right. They love Ron Paul. They love Christine O’Donnell. They love that kind of stuff. ROVE: Let’s be clear about it. There is a healthy dose, an unhealthy amount of people in the — in that movement who are 9/11 deniers. I keep running into them. They protest me. Ron Paul — big Ron Paul stickers and so forth. They are birthers. Look, we had people stand up and boo Dick Cheney and — O’REILLY: They called him a war criminal. ROVE: And because again, you have a very thin fringe. O’REILLY: But how big is that? ROVE: It’s not big at all. Remember, Ron Paul who had a lot of very — you know, sort of mainstream issues regarding, say, the Federal Reserve and hard money. O’REILLY: Put a percentage of — ROVE: It’s a fraction — tiny, insignificant. O’REILLY: So this poll it says 51 percent of — I know this poll is flawed. ROVE: This poll is flawed. But I do say this; Republicans had better be clear about this. This we had a problem in the 1950′s with the John Birch Society and it took Bill Buckley standing up as a strong conservative and taking them on. And within our party we have to be very careful about allowing these people who are the birthers and the 9/11 deniers to get too high a profile and say too much without setting the record straight. O’REILLY: But what percentage of Republican voters — five percent; 10 percent? ROVE: I don’t know. But whatever it is, it ought to be less because we need the leaders of our party to say look, stop falling into the trap of the White House. Focus on the real issues. Actually, this isn’t the first time we’ve heard this theory on The O’Reilly Factor . And as we observed back then: Now, if Goldberg and O’Reilly are so concerned that the public might conclude that mainstream conservatives are prone to far-right conspiracy theories and various other forms of wingnuttery, they might look in the mirror. It’s the virtual definition of wingnuttery to even be asking why Obama won’t release his birth certificate when he has in fact done so. There’s no Obama conspiracy keeping this garbage alive and tying it around the necks of mainstream conservatives. They’re doing a very fine job of that themselves. And in the case of Karl Rove, you simply can’t defend John Boehner’s manifest failure of leadership in refusing to denounce the Birthers and then turn around in the same breath and declare that Republican need to separate themselves from their nutty Bircher faction. Fact is, these guys are caught, as they have been for awhile, in the toxic embrace of their increasingly extremist base, embodied by a Tea Party movement in which Birtherism is a supermajority belief. What Rove won’t admit (and Boehner’s abject failure to lead on the issue implicitly concedes) is that Republicans would never win any elections without that same nutty element that has always helped elect them — but which they want to write off as the product of an evil Obama plot. Like that’s going to help them deal with it. Full transcript here.
Continue reading …After last Saturday’s protest, the desire for reform and freedom is stirring in Algeria – despite the shadow of past civil war Sunday 13 February 13 – The Day After 1st of May Square, Algeria’s “Little Tahrir”, looks bizarrely normal the morning after the 12 February opposition protest that defied a massive police deployment . The fountain is back on and there are only a few ordinary cops around, compared with the thousands from the anti-riot squad who blanketed the space on Sunday, arresting hundreds. I am picked up in the square to attend the follow up meeting of the protest’s organisers, the National Coordinating Committee for Change and Democracy (CNCD), at a union hall near the airport. The elderly lawyer Ali Yahia Abdennour opens the discussion: “They beat our old and young, our women and men.” He calls for demonstrations the following Saturday and every Saturday thereafter until the entire Algerian population descends into the streets. The meeting ratifies his idea, declaring another protest 19 February on 1st of May Square. Monday 14 February – Valentine’s Day à l’Algérienne In the morning, I am stuck in the cement-like traffic of Algiers. A smiling young woman in hijab with elaborate eye makeup shares my taxi and we talk about how she would like to visit her relatives in the United States, and her hopes for Algeria. When she alights, she takes the rhinestone brooch off her headscarf and gives it to me, kissing me on both cheeks. This humbling generosity is one of Algeria’s greatest natural resources; her broach one of the best Valentine’s Day gifts I have ever received. Later in the day, near the House of the Press where many newspapers are headquartered, Mustapha Benfodil, one of Algeria’s leading writers and journalists, tells me how difficult it is to get permission to produce his plays in Algerian theatres. As a result, he has taken to staging readings in public places, lectures sauvages or wild readings, as he calls them. This often results in his arrest. He has written some of the best articles about the recent demonstrations in one of Algeria’s prominent newspapers, El Watan. Here is how he described the 12 February gathering on 1st of May Square: “There was an air of Tahrir Square, Cairo’s heroic liberation site … Political and NGO activists, trade unionists, the unemployed, professionals, government workers, women, many women, artists, students, academics, the retired, adolescents, young girls, old people, secularists, Islamists, Communists, Facebookers and those with indeterminate opinions. The square … was sparkling, turbulent and full of that angry effervescence of proud cities.” (Read the original in French if you can – it rhymes.) At twilight, I meet with a woman professional in her 40s whom I will call Zohra, in the swank Hotel Djazair, and am taken aback when she leans over and says quietly, “I would do anything to participate in bringing this government down, whatever the price.” For Zohra, taghair el nitham (changing the system) also means ameliorating the condition of women, and challenging social conservatism. “Now you have to hide to have a drink, if you choose not to fast during Ramadan, if you go out with someone.” She will attend the 19 February march, though she will conceal this from her family. I want to walk to where I am staying but am reminded of the night before when the somber streets rapidly became male-only territory, so I hail a cab. The balding driver in his sixties explains that “In Arab and Islamic countries, we have only been given a choice between dictatorship and Islamism. What we need instead is a just middle.” He doesn’t think much of the fundamentalists and is very sympathetic to the demonstrators. When I ask if many people will attend next Saturday, he replies, “Why [would people go] when last time you had 2,000 protestors and 40,000 police?” And when we talk about last Saturday’s young “hired” pro-government counter-demonstrators, he asks, “What did they leave for these youth? No dancing, no bars, no cafes, no cinemas, just the mosque.” Tuesday 15 February – Mouloud I celebrate the birthday of the Prophet Mohamed at lunch with a group of feminist activists. Many are involved with the newly-created Observatory on violence against women . They see the “woman question” as immediately political, and so their coalition joined the coordinating committee organising the protests. They want issues like the abrogation of the discriminatory family code to be on the change agenda. “Therefore, we must march.” They toast democracy with a glass of Algerian wine. Some argue that Islamism is dead here. When Ali Belhadj, former number two of the Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) , attempted to enter the march on Saturday with a reported 50 of his activists – a fact that al-Jazeera trumpeted all day long – he was denounced as an assassin by some protestors (al-Jazeera did not make a headline of that). Many young people simply did not know who Belhadj was. Another woman tells me later that she is not so sure fundamentalism has faded, the society having been deeply Islamised since the period of terrorism. Some of the women are very optimistic for the coming Saturday, expecting more protestors. The foreign minister had even announced today that the state of emergency would be lifted within days . However, another woman worries that next time the young counter-demonstrators will be ready to “smash our faces”. One says simply, “This is not the end. It is the beginning.” At the same time, they all stress the differences between Algeria and Egypt. Referring to the mass exodus of Algeria’s educated class during the slaughter of the 1990s, they note, “their intellectuals did not have to leave and they were not isolated. Tunisia and Egypt have real bourgeoisies; our elite is dispersed everywhere.” I leave to meet the founders of Collectif Algerie Pacifique, a youth group created on Facebook : 3,500 people signed up to participate in their first action. “I hate politics,” Amine Menadi, 29, says. “Our politics is to say what we think.” He explains their initial motivation: “We wanted to respond to the way the minister of the interior insulted the youth [after January's riots] and to show we do know how to express ourselves peacefully but they won’t let us.” They had a gathering on 13 January in the 1st of May Square against the riots, but also against what caused the riots. “We have had enough violence in our country.” Aware of their own limitations, Amine asks: “How can we have a demonstration where we are only a few thousand and say we are the people? There are 5 million Algérois; 5,000 people is not even a rock concert.” However, he reminds us that friends in Tunis “said that Sidi Bouzid was just a little town, and then they found themselves in the street.” They are frustrated with some aspects of the opposition leadership, like the involvement of political parties, but say they are drowning, and that a drowning person will grab onto a pencil if it might keep him afloat. “We want a better Algeria. We will march on the 19th.” Wednesday 16 February – Vodka in Bab el-Oued At noon, I meet Samir Larabi, a young activist with the new National Committee for the Defence of the Rights of the Unemployed. This organisation held a demonstration in front of the labour ministry on 6 February that was suppressed by the police. An unemployed man tried to set himself on fire but was saved by a journalist from El Watan. Larabi explains that people are active now because security has improved since the 1990s, and indeed, the country is well-off economically – while its ordinary people suffer miserable living conditions. This is partly a revolt of raised expectations. A major theme of my interviews is the disgust that ordinary people feel about what is called politics. Larabi says the young “vomit the politicians”. Yet, he also understands that a credible political alternative will be necessary to actually improve conditions here. During the day, I Iearn that the YouTube H’chicha has called for an alternative protest on Friday 18 February. Some fear this will attract a different crowd, coming after Friday prayers. But a few longhaired young organisers I encounter tell me they would go to any demonstration called now. I meet another member of the CNCD, a journalist/Facebooker in a leather jacket, named Fodil Boumala, who was arrested last Saturday. For him, the current government is “illegal, illegitimate and violates the constitution”. He stresses that the marches are not ends in themselves, but he points to several successes: first, they got Algeria moving, quite literally; second, they got the Algerian diaspora mobilised – in Paris, Montreal and beyond; and third, they elicited responses from foreign governments – notably France, Germany and the US – calling on the Algerian state not to repress demonstrations. I follow Fodil to a meeting of intellectuals. Everyone seems to be organising a committee or network, drafting a declaration or a set of principles. Still, these intellectuals are not overly optimistic. “It is not yet the turn of Algeria,” one tells me. “We must worry about our Tunisian and Egyptian friends that they could have the same problems that we had [after October 1988 when protests led to brief democratisation, a flawed electoral process and a bloody civil war].” At the end of the day, I head to Bab el-Oued, the legendary quartier populaire near the sea that was a stronghold of the FIS during the terrible 1990s, to visit an association that works with poor youth. This area was home to some of the early January riots. In the offices of SOS Bab el-Oued , a neighbourhood rock band practises what sounds like “Louie, Louie” in Algerian Arabic in the basement under a picture of Che Guevara. The activists here seem to be almost equally disappointed in the state and the opposition, neither of which they feel has made an effort to reach out to the base. “We are strangled. We are suffocated.” There is “no work, no leisure … we had 10 years of terrorism.” Tired of explaining what reality can better illustrate, Nacer Meghenine, president of the association, leaps to his feet and tells me to follow. I end up touring Bab el-Oued by night. First, we visit a family of eight who live in one room. The grandmother holds an infant suffering from spina bifida with a large growth on her back and crossed eyes. They are waiting for an operation she needs. Despite their terrible situation, the grandmother is an ardent supporter of President Bouteflika whom she distinguishes from the government, and she opposes the marches because she is terrified of a return to violence – a fear the regime has capitalised on. “We are tired of blood after 10 years. Bezzef ! [Too much!]” In response, Nacer says, “Don’t tell them about democracy! They live day by day.” A 50-something fundamentalist in the street tells me there are lots of vultures here that only the will of God can chase away. When I ask about the marches, he says that as long as Bab el-Oued is not awakened, nothing will happen. Later, Nacer tells me that anyone who thinks fundamentalism is dead has not been to Bab el-Oued. He points out that the streets are full of bearded men, explaining that they have been a repeated obstacle in his work. We head to a former parking garage turned into what one can only term so-called housing. There is garbage everywhere. Two young men stand inside the entrance, drinking vodka. What else is there to do in Bab el-Oued by night? I visit a young couple who live in two rooms with their infant. My friendly hostess tells me her husband works as a security guard. She lays out her daily difficulties. “My husband earns 10,000 dinars a month. My son’s milk costs 300 dinars a can. It only lasts a few days. His diapers cost another 750 dinars. How can we feed ourselves?” She tells me there are women sleeping on cartons in the street. Ominously, she warns that things could explode. Then she shows me how she plugged the gaps around her windows to protect her son from tear gas during January’s uprising. “It will be much worse than January, if it doesn’t change peacefully.” In another home, a family of five live in one room. Some years ago, they made an official housing request but never received a response. The serious young father studied psychology and sociology, supports the marches and is desperate for change. He says, “I don’t need a million dinars. I just need a job, housing and protection for my children.” His wife was mugged a few days ago. As we walk back, I ask Nacer what the state should do for people here, and he says quite simply – we need a Marshall Plan. A key challenge seems to be bridging the gap between the dedicated activists I met in the city above and the people here in Bab el-Oued, to cross the divide between the peaceful protests and the proletarian émeutes described by the researcher Amel Boubekeur . Nevertheless, whatever the imperfections, this Saturday, when I watch the bloggers and the feminists and the unemployed try to march for a new Algeria, I will think of what Samir Larabi told me: “We need democracy to fight exploitation. Bread and liberty are not alternatives.” I will carry the rhinestone brooch of the young woman from the taxi in my pocket as a symbol of the sparkling promise of Algeria. And I will think of the desperate hope and anger of the good people of Bab el-Oued. Despite all the paradoxes, this Saturday, the marchers will again try to take a step toward a better future for this country, the future its older people fought for yesterday and its young people deserve today. Algeria Middle East Protest Egypt Tunisia Islam Karima Bennoune guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Ed Schultz is reporting with laser focus on the labor protests in Wisconsin and thank heavens he is, since there has been a virtual media blackout until yesterday when Fox News began to deploy its planned propaganda campaign against the protesters. There are times where it’s difficult for me to tell if Beck is crazy or sarcastic, and his opening shot about how the protesters are carrying signs with “violent rhetoric saying ‘kill this bill’” is one of those times. Does he actually think there’s a parallel to other right-wing protests with hateful signs? At any rate, Ed does a great job of illustrating Beck’s double standard, where it’s perfectly fine for Tea Party protests organized by billionaires to be hailed as an act of patriotism. They’re patriots. But when labor unions protest having their right to bargain stripped away, they’re a bunch of kids stirring things up, and somewhere along the way, Beck managed to find a couple of kids who appeared to be a bit clueless about what the protests were about, calling them “useful idiots.” Useful idiots, eh? I wonder how Wisconsin school teachers feel about being called useful idiots, especially since Wisconsin public schools are among the best in the country . ED: So remember, if you’re a tea party protester, you’re an idiot. If you’re a labor protester, you’re a useful idiot or a Muslim revolutionary. The public excuse for the governor’s move is a “budget crisis”, but there is no crisis, not really. As The Nation ‘s John Nichols points out, there’s “no question” that Governor Nichols is cooking the books to break the unions. Unions already made sacrifices to balance the budget, which held everything in balance until Walker cut corporate taxes while raising individual taxes. The governor’s budget repair bill, which includes the plan to gut collective bargaining protections for public employees, does not seek to get the state’s fiscal house in order. Rather, it is seeks a political goal: destroying public employee unions, which demand fair treatment of workers and hold governors of both parties to account when they seek to undermine public services and public education. Local blogger Dave von Ebers puts it in perspective : Gov. Walker must have some enormous brass ones, considering Wisconsin’s individual income tax rates for 2011 range from a low of 5% to a high of 8% (the highest rate being some 60% higher than the new Illinois tax rate); while its corporate tax rate for 2010 is 7.9% (again, nearly a point higher than Illinois’ corporate tax rate). In John Nichols’ interview with Democracy Now , he elaborates: What’s troubling to me is this talk of calling out the National Guard, this talk of really repressively putting down protests in the state of Wisconsin, a state with a great progressive tradition and a state that, as I said before, the rest of the country is watching. The fact is, Wisconsin is not broke. The Fiscal Bureau of Wisconsin just said in January that it will end this year with a $123 million surplus. So the fact of the matter is that this is not being done because of a lack of money. This is being done because political forces, conservative political forces, would like to disempower public employee unions and remove that voice for a strong public sector. That’s what austerity really translates as. And I do hope people keep an eye on what’s happening in Wisconsin with a similar eye to what they watch protests around the world with. This is a place where we really are going to see a critical test of whether workers have the right and also the power to demand fair play. Click here to view this media Nichols is right, of course. Scott Walker has just delivered the first ground assault against unions, which is part of a larger strategy. Ed does a great job of laying it out in this segment. Here’s the strategy: Buy a few governors in key states. Launch stealth legislative assaults on public union workers, stripping them of their rights to bargain and/or strike. Use right-wing media (Fox News) to fearmonger about union violence. As memberships dwindle, so too do funds for political activity by unions. Karl Rove confirmed it on Fox News. Rove: “Every one of those 600,000 people had several hundred dollars worth of union dues going into the political coffers of their union to spend on politics. So yeah, you keep having a couple hundred thousand people each year. If a half a million people leave the labor union movement every year, pretty soon you start having a crimp in the political budget of these unions, it has a direct effect on the Presidential elections. ” Out of the mouth of the man himself. As Ed says, that might be the most honest thing he’s ever said. A lot is at stake in Wisconsin, but Wisconsin isn’t the only state where unions are at risk. Ohio Governor John Kasich is working hard to destroy them there, too, prompting large protests this week in Columbus over similar legislation brought forward by Republican state senators and endorsed by Kasich: The Senate bill, sponsored by Republican state Sen. Shannon Jones, would eliminate collective bargaining rights and salary schedules for public employees across the state. GOP Gov. John Kasich has expressed his support for the bill in concept, but he has also signaled he may bring forth his own plan that could go even further — including banning public employee strikes. In Idaho, legislation is pending which prohibits taxpayer money from going to union dues , effectively prohibiting public employees from unionizing. The legislation would ban taxpayer money from going toward a labor organization for dues or to train workers , while also prohibiting school districts from including union activities in job descriptions or paying teachers for any time they spent on those activities. Most local union leaders are volunteers, but a handful work full-time on behalf of educators in Idaho’s largest school districts, according to the union. These arrangements are bargained at the local level. But there is good news. Thousands are standing for change. Right-wing assaults on labor unions have shaken people out of their seats and their stupors, put a name to the evil they understood but didn’t know how to fight. This war is by no means behind us, but this is how it will be won. In the streets of state capitols, in the gatherings of people tired of dictatorial corporate masters, and by all of us standing in solidarity with them. Howard Zinn: “Small acts, when multiplied by millions of people, can quietly become a power no government can suppress, a power than can transform the world.”
Continue reading …