Click here to view this media Liberals, as the tired conservative slander goes, hate America. This, of course, is nonsense. Liberals simply want to deliver on the national promise of a more perfect union, to shorten the distance, as Bruce Springsteen aptly put it, “between American ideals and American reality.” But if the past three Republican presidential debates are any indicator, it would appear that conservatives hate Americans. Or more precisely, some Americans. As audiences of the faithful booed an active duty U.S. soldier because he is gay and cheered the deaths of executed prisoners and the uninsured alike, the GOP White House hopefuls on stage remained silent. All because, it seems, they had to. Sadly, that complicity is apparently now a requirement to lead a Republican Party in which demonizing gays, minorities, immigrants and Muslims – that is, hating Americans – is increasingly a centerpiece of its politics. For his part, Weekly Standard editor and conservative strategist Bill Kristol summed up Thursday night’s GOP debate debacle in a single word – “Yikes”: Reading the reactions of thoughtful commentators after the stage emptied, talking with conservative policy types and GOP political operatives later last evening and this morning, we know we’re not alone. Most won’t express publicly just how horrified–or at least how demoralized–they are… The e-mails flooding into our inbox during the evening were less guarded. Early on, we received this missive from a bright young conservative: “I’m watching my first GOP debate…and WE SOUND LIKE CRAZY PEOPLE!!!!” As the evening went on, the craziness receded, and the demoralized comments we received stressed the mediocrity of the field rather than its wackiness. But Kristol’s discomfort was with his party’s messengers, not its message. And for years, that message has been unchanged. On this Republican Animal Farm, some Americans are more equal than others . That was clear during the 2008 election. Before Rep. Robin Hayes (R-NC) said – and then denied saying – “liberals hate real Americans,” the sound bite was firmly established as a GOP talking point. A few days before, McCain spokeswoman Nancy Pfotenhauer explained that northern Virginia was not the “real Virginia.” GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin amplified on the point during an event in North Carolina: “We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation.” To be sure, the Republicans’ real Americans aren’t Muslims. Long before Mitt Romney and Herman Cain first announced they would not appoint Muslim Americans to their cabinet, Republican leaders and their amen corner were calling for their profiling , internment and worse. Keith Ellison, the first follower of Islam elected to Congress, was welcomed by Glenn Beck demanding he “prove to me that you are not working with our enemies” and his Virginia House colleague Virgil Goode warning about “many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran.”) It came as no surprise that Republicans demagogued the Park 51 cultural center, the supposed ” Ground Zero mosque ” Sarah Palin asked Muslims to “refudiate.” (What is surprising is that Park 51 opened this week with only a whimper from its right-wing foes. Palin’s Republicans seem similarly intent on “refudiating” that gay and lesbian Americans are “real Americans,” either. Years before Rick Santorum used the Orlando GOP debate to denounce the “special privilege” gay Americans now receive by being allowed to serve their country, he introduced his frothy mixture of politics and hate by comparing same-sex marriage to ” man-on-dog ” relationships. It’s no wonder that GOProud demanded an apology: “That brave gay soldier is doing something Rick Santorum has never done – put his life on the line to defend our freedoms and our way of life. It is telling that Rick Santorum is so blinded by his anti-gay bigotry that he couldn’t even bring himself to thank that gay soldier for his service.” For his part, Texas Governor and GOP frontrunner Rick Perry headlined “The Response” in August, an event co-sponsored by the American Family Association whose director Bryan Fischer explained in June: “So it was homosexual thugs that helped Hitler to form the Nazi Party.” As for Michele Bachmann , whose husband Marcus’ clinic received federal funds for helping patients “pray away the gay,” proclaimed the “gay and lesbian lifestyle” is “personal bondage, personal despair, and personal enslavement” and “part of Satan.” Those views should win her the support of GOP officials like Oklahoma’s Sally Kern (who repeatedly claimed homosexuality is “more dangerous” than terrorism) and North Carolina’s Paul Stam (who explained that gay people are “things” whose relationships can be “treated differently.”) Then there are immigrants, legal and otherwise. Long before Rick Perry defended his record in Texas by telling his detractors “I don’t think you have a heart,” his Republican Party showed it didn’t have a brain, either. Four years ago, most of the Republican candidates snubbed debates sponsored by Univision and the National Council of La Raza (events which they later scrambled to reschedule). John Kerry carried only 53 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, but by 2006, Democrats won 69 percent support among the nation’s 43 million Hispanics who went to the polls. President Obama similarly won their vote by a 2-1 margin two years later. Even in the GOP’s 2010 landslide , Democrats earned the backing of 60 percent of Latino voters. ( Subsequent studies suggest the actual Latino support of GOP candidates was much lower than reported.) As NCLR’s Cecilia Munoz put it in September 2007: “It’s not just that they are not coming. It’s that some of them are visibly insulting us.” And, of course, there is the case of African-Americans. Slavery, unmentioned in the Confederate Heritage Month proclamations in Virginia and Mississippi, was in the words of Governor and former RNC chairman Haley Barbour “a nit.” The GOP’s neo-Confederate antebellum nostalgia runs deep. In 2009, Georgia Rep. Paul Broun declared, “If ObamaCare passes, that free insurance card that’s in people’s pockets is gonna be as worthless as a Confederate dollar after the War Between The States — the Great War of Yankee Aggression.” In February 2009, Missouri Republican Bryan Stevenson took exception to President Obama’s support for the Freedom of Choice Act, legislation which would codify the reproductive rights protections of Roe v. Wade nationwide, announcing, “What we are dealing with today is the greatest power grab by the federal government since the War of Northern Aggression.” So, it should come as no surprise that Arizona Congressman Trent Franks proclaimed in February 2010: “Far more of the African-American community is being devastated by the policies of today than were being devastated by policies of slavery.” In response to African-Americans’ monolithic support for Democratic candidates – 89 percent in 2006, 95 percent in 2008 – Republicans have come up with a novel strategy. Keep them from voting. Draconian voter ID laws first introduced in Georgia, Indiana, Arizona and Missouri have expanded to other states, most notably Wisconsin. Despite the almost complete absence of vote fraud in the United States, voter identification laws have joined unprecedented redistricting, barriers to registration and Election Day ballot box challenges to suppress minority (read “Democratic) turnout. As Georgia Republican Sue Burmeister explained the GOP smoke screen , claiming that when black voters in her black precincts “are not paid to vote, they don’t go to the polls.” It’s no wonder some tea party Republicans have called for restricting suffrage to property owners and, along with GOP presidential frontrunner Rick Perry, want to eliminate the 17th amendment to the Constitution which enabled direct election of Senators. And the none-too-thinly veiled racist venom is directed at Barack Obama, the nation’s first African-American President. While Newt Gingrich likened the Obama presidency to the threat posed by the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, the Republicans’ tea party faithful have been even less subtle. While studies this year and l ast reflected the virulently racist attitudes of some tea party members, i ts elected officials called him “tar baby” and “boy” and have circulated emails portraying the President as a pimp , a monkey and a target for assassination . After South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson interrupted President Obama’s address to Congress by yelling out “you lie,” supporters sent him hundreds of thousands of dollars of campaign cash. The Wilson episode was hauntingly familiar. In 1856, admirers sent canes to another South Carolina Representative, Preston Brooks , after he viciously caned abolitionist Senator Charles Sumner in the Capitol. As one laudatory editorial back in Brooks’ home state put it, “Meetings of approval and sanction will be held, not only in Mr. Brooks’ district, but throughout the State at large, and a general and hearty response of approval will re-echo the words, ‘Well done,’ from Washington to the Rio Grande.” And so it goes. Long after the Republican debates of 2011 are forgotten, the fear-mongering and demonization of some Americans will still be a staple of conservative politics. And right-wing bookshelves will still be populated with books like Treason , Guilty and Slander proclaiming things like: “Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don’t hate America like liberals do.” (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Liberals, as the tired conservative slander goes, hate America. This, of course, is nonsense. Liberals simply want to deliver on the national promise of a more perfect union, to shorten the distance, as Bruce Springsteen aptly put it, “between American ideals and American reality.” But if the past three Republican presidential debates are any indicator, it would appear that conservatives hate Americans. Or more precisely, some Americans. As audiences of the faithful booed an active duty U.S. soldier because he is gay and cheered the deaths of executed prisoners and the uninsured alike, the GOP White House hopefuls on stage remained silent. All because, it seems, they had to. Sadly, that complicity is apparently now a requirement to lead a Republican Party in which demonizing gays, minorities, immigrants and Muslims – that is, hating Americans – is increasingly a centerpiece of its politics. For his part, Weekly Standard editor and conservative strategist Bill Kristol summed up Thursday night’s GOP debate debacle in a single word – “Yikes”: Reading the reactions of thoughtful commentators after the stage emptied, talking with conservative policy types and GOP political operatives later last evening and this morning, we know we’re not alone. Most won’t express publicly just how horrified–or at least how demoralized–they are… The e-mails flooding into our inbox during the evening were less guarded. Early on, we received this missive from a bright young conservative: “I’m watching my first GOP debate…and WE SOUND LIKE CRAZY PEOPLE!!!!” As the evening went on, the craziness receded, and the demoralized comments we received stressed the mediocrity of the field rather than its wackiness. But Kristol’s discomfort was with his party’s messengers, not its message. And for years, that message has been unchanged. On this Republican Animal Farm, some Americans are more equal than others . That was clear during the 2008 election. Before Rep. Robin Hayes (R-NC) said – and then denied saying – “liberals hate real Americans,” the sound bite was firmly established as a GOP talking point. A few days before, McCain spokeswoman Nancy Pfotenhauer explained that northern Virginia was not the “real Virginia.” GOP vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin amplified on the point during an event in North Carolina: “We believe that the best of America is in these small towns that we get to visit, and in these wonderful little pockets of what I call the real America, being here with all of you hard working very patriotic, um, very, um, pro-America areas of this great nation.” To be sure, the Republicans’ real Americans aren’t Muslims. Long before Mitt Romney and Herman Cain first announced they would not appoint Muslim Americans to their cabinet, Republican leaders and their amen corner were calling for their profiling , internment and worse. Keith Ellison, the first follower of Islam elected to Congress, was welcomed by Glenn Beck demanding he “prove to me that you are not working with our enemies” and his Virginia House colleague Virgil Goode warning about “many more Muslims elected to office and demanding the use of the Koran.”) It came as no surprise that Republicans demagogued the Park 51 cultural center, the supposed ” Ground Zero mosque ” Sarah Palin asked Muslims to “refudiate.” (What is surprising is that Park 51 opened this week with only a whimper from its right-wing foes. Palin’s Republicans seem similarly intent on “refudiating” that gay and lesbian Americans are “real Americans,” either. Years before Rick Santorum used the Orlando GOP debate to denounce the “special privilege” gay Americans now receive by being allowed to serve their country, he introduced his frothy mixture of politics and hate by comparing same-sex marriage to ” man-on-dog ” relationships. It’s no wonder that GOProud demanded an apology: “That brave gay soldier is doing something Rick Santorum has never done – put his life on the line to defend our freedoms and our way of life. It is telling that Rick Santorum is so blinded by his anti-gay bigotry that he couldn’t even bring himself to thank that gay soldier for his service.” For his part, Texas Governor and GOP frontrunner Rick Perry headlined “The Response” in August, an event co-sponsored by the American Family Association whose director Bryan Fischer explained in June: “So it was homosexual thugs that helped Hitler to form the Nazi Party.” As for Michele Bachmann , whose husband Marcus’ clinic received federal funds for helping patients “pray away the gay,” proclaimed the “gay and lesbian lifestyle” is “personal bondage, personal despair, and personal enslavement” and “part of Satan.” Those views should win her the support of GOP officials like Oklahoma’s Sally Kern (who repeatedly claimed homosexuality is “more dangerous” than terrorism) and North Carolina’s Paul Stam (who explained that gay people are “things” whose relationships can be “treated differently.”) Then there are immigrants, legal and otherwise. Long before Rick Perry defended his record in Texas by telling his detractors “I don’t think you have a heart,” his Republican Party showed it didn’t have a brain, either. Four years ago, most of the Republican candidates snubbed debates sponsored by Univision and the National Council of La Raza (events which they later scrambled to reschedule). John Kerry carried only 53 percent of the Hispanic vote in 2004, but by 2006, Democrats won 69 percent support among the nation’s 43 million Hispanics who went to the polls. President Obama similarly won their vote by a 2-1 margin two years later. Even in the GOP’s 2010 landslide , Democrats earned the backing of 60 percent of Latino voters. ( Subsequent studies suggest the actual Latino support of GOP candidates was much lower than reported.) As NCLR’s Cecilia Munoz put it in September 2007: “It’s not just that they are not coming. It’s that some of them are visibly insulting us.” And, of course, there is the case of African-Americans. Slavery, unmentioned in the Confederate Heritage Month proclamations in Virginia and Mississippi, was in the words of Governor and former RNC chairman Haley Barbour “a nit.” The GOP’s neo-Confederate antebellum nostalgia runs deep. In 2009, Georgia Rep. Paul Broun declared, “If ObamaCare passes, that free insurance card that’s in people’s pockets is gonna be as worthless as a Confederate dollar after the War Between The States — the Great War of Yankee Aggression.” In February 2009, Missouri Republican Bryan Stevenson took exception to President Obama’s support for the Freedom of Choice Act, legislation which would codify the reproductive rights protections of Roe v. Wade nationwide, announcing, “What we are dealing with today is the greatest power grab by the federal government since the War of Northern Aggression.” So, it should come as no surprise that Arizona Congressman Trent Franks proclaimed in February 2010: “Far more of the African-American community is being devastated by the policies of today than were being devastated by policies of slavery.” In response to African-Americans’ monolithic support for Democratic candidates – 89 percent in 2006, 95 percent in 2008 – Republicans have come up with a novel strategy. Keep them from voting. Draconian voter ID laws first introduced in Georgia, Indiana, Arizona and Missouri have expanded to other states, most notably Wisconsin. Despite the almost complete absence of vote fraud in the United States, voter identification laws have joined unprecedented redistricting, barriers to registration and Election Day ballot box challenges to suppress minority (read “Democratic) turnout. As Georgia Republican Sue Burmeister explained the GOP smoke screen , claiming that when black voters in her black precincts “are not paid to vote, they don’t go to the polls.” It’s no wonder some tea party Republicans have called for restricting suffrage to property owners and, along with GOP presidential frontrunner Rick Perry, want to eliminate the 17th amendment to the Constitution which enabled direct election of Senators. And the none-too-thinly veiled racist venom is directed at Barack Obama, the nation’s first African-American President. While Newt Gingrich likened the Obama presidency to the threat posed by the Soviet Union or Nazi Germany, the Republicans’ tea party faithful have been even less subtle. While studies this year and l ast reflected the virulently racist attitudes of some tea party members, i ts elected officials called him “tar baby” and “boy” and have circulated emails portraying the President as a pimp , a monkey and a target for assassination . After South Carolina Rep. Joe Wilson interrupted President Obama’s address to Congress by yelling out “you lie,” supporters sent him hundreds of thousands of dollars of campaign cash. The Wilson episode was hauntingly familiar. In 1856, admirers sent canes to another South Carolina Representative, Preston Brooks , after he viciously caned abolitionist Senator Charles Sumner in the Capitol. As one laudatory editorial back in Brooks’ home state put it, “Meetings of approval and sanction will be held, not only in Mr. Brooks’ district, but throughout the State at large, and a general and hearty response of approval will re-echo the words, ‘Well done,’ from Washington to the Rio Grande.” And so it goes. Long after the Republican debates of 2011 are forgotten, the fear-mongering and demonization of some Americans will still be a staple of conservative politics. And right-wing bookshelves will still be populated with books like Treason , Guilty and Slander proclaiming things like: “Liberals hate America, they hate flag-wavers, they hate abortion opponents, they hate all religions except Islam, post 9/11. Even Islamic terrorists don’t hate America like liberals do.” (This piece also appears at Perrspectives .)
Continue reading …Defence chiefs want improved unmanned machines that could one day take over tasks undertaken by RAF pilots The Ministry of Defence is seeking to develop a new generation of surveillance systems that will automatically identify people regarded as high-value targets, the Guardian has learned. The systems would also be able to automatically tell the difference between vehicles, potentially diminishing the role that humans play in the gathering of intelligence. Though the systems could, in theory, give confidence to military planners preparing a strike mission, it will also raise fears about machines being in a position to decide whether and when to use lethal force against an enemy. Defence experts have been undertaking presentations to IT companies, explaining the type of equipment the military is looking for. At one of the meetings in Cardiff earlier this month, they encouraged pitches for “automatic (assisted) target recognition” systems, specifically designed to identify people and vehicles from the air, or on the ground. In particular, they asked for “detection and recognition of people and gestures in urban scenarios”. Such sensors would be able to identify “face, gait and shape features”, as well as “identify individuals or reacquire targets from their own signature”. Surveillance equipment can already identify vehicles, but the presentation explains that more sophisticated systems are needed because “current algorithms can be confused by camouflage, shadows, and clutter”. Ideally, the sensors would be able to differentiate between colours and have thermal imaging. The systems could be incorporated on UAVs – unmanned aerial vehicles, more commonly called drones. The presentation in Cardiff was organised by the Defence, Science and Technology Laboratory, working with the Centre for Defence Enterprise. They are arms of the MoD that specialise in future technologies. The military believes that there are small firms, not usually involved in defence work, that may be further ahead, or have better ideas, than the ones they are used to dealing with. “It is our job to innovate, and to go beyond our standard suppliers,” said a spokesman. “What we are looking to do is find out the maximum extent of what is feasibly possible. We need to engage with people who would not normally be involved in defence. Not just companies, but universities and academics too.” Chris Cole, who runs the Drones War website , said he was concerned about the focus on new systems that would give even more capability to UAVs, which have been used so controversially by the US to target suspected terrorists in Pakistan. “While repeatedly insisting there is nothing controversial about the use of unmanned systems, the MoD is now combining drones with automatic target recognition technology in an attempt to seek out individuals on a so-called high value target list. “Many will find this development extremely disturbing and inhuman. We call for proper public oversight and scrutiny of the growing development and use of armed drones by British forces.” Separately, the MoD has placed a 100-page document in the House of Commons library which sets out “the UK approach to unmanned aircraft systems”. It makes clear that UAVs will be an integral part of the UK’s future weapons systems and could one day perform all of the tasks undertaken by RAF pilots. It also sets out the ethical and legal dilemmas that face the military. The document states that there is a “general expectation across defence, academia and industry that unmanned aircraft will become more prevalent, eventually taking over all of the tasks currently undertaken by manned systems. This is strongly reflected in current government policy.” Cutting costs and minimising the threat to personnel are the motivations for embracing new technology, it adds. The document also makes clear that the joint strike fighter (JSF), which is due in service in 2020, could well be the last of its kind. “It is increasingly common to hear JSF referred to as the last manned fighter platform … this may well be true. “How soon we see the air power roles of attack and mobility and lift conducted by unmanned systems will be reliant on advances in technology, cost effectiveness and public acceptance.” Andrew Brookes, editor of The Air League , said: “By 2030 the mix between manned and unmanned in the air force will be half and half. Anything more than that is just an aspiration. My concern about the use of UAVs is that you should never give the politician an easy option to go to war. It should be the last resort, not the first. UAVs give them an easy option because lives are not being put at risk.” Ministry of Defence Defence policy United States US national security Pakistan Global terrorism UK security and terrorism Terrorism policy Nick Hopkins guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …“I will always err on the side of life.” Rick Perry, signed off on 234 executions Dearest Web Log , This virtual space has, so far , been dedicated to my slapstick encounter with the American police state. But with the execution of Troy Davis, a few false charges and a potential year in jail seems like such a white thing to complain about. Like my socks and sandals don’t match my cargo shorts or something. Davis’s murder (may read differently depending on your politics) brings to light a profoundly darker comedy called American Morality. It’s funny in the way that absurd non sequiturs can be, like monkey pajamas, or Fox News. As a nation, we don’t have a real good handle on the whole morality thing. For instance, and this is not a joke, some people profess to know with absolute certainty that our moral code was dictated by an all-powerful space ghost, who sculpted us out of magic clay, and transcribed on stone by a mountain-climbing desert-hobo who looked a great deal like Charlton Heston. The people who believe these things are called idiots. Maybe you’ve seen them infesting our politics and poisoning our culture…at last week’s Fox News #googledebate. Bachmann and Perry are both – to varying degrees – Dominionists, which means they’re trying to conquer the “seven mountains” of cultural power by conducting “strategic level spiritual warfare” against the “higher level demons” who currently control eastern religions, witchcraft, Freemasonry, and the heathen souls of all non Christians around the globe, like PZ Myers. Romney and Hunstman are Mormons, which means they ostensibly believe that God lives on the planet Kolob and, if they’re extra good Mormons, they’ll become Gods themselves in the afterlife. And don’t get me started on the Golden Tablets or the Jewish Native Americans. Even Newt Gingrich has to pretend to be a good, God-fearing non-sack of walking excrement. Ron Paul says he believes that life starts at conception, and that evolution is just a theory, but he only genuinely worships at the deregulated altar of Ayn Rand. Herman Caine is a Baptist minister. And his 999 deal means that he’s is definitely not the pizza-slinging Antichrist. And Rick Santorum is so religious he’s an obvious homosexual. Troy Davis didn’t come up at the debate, which, in this blogger’s opinion, was a huge missed opportunity for the candidates to connect with the base by singing another patriotic rendition of “Let him die!” The crowd did boo a gay soldier, so there was that rare moment of Republican honesty – and when Mitt Romney said, “There are a lot of reasons not to vote for me.” And that’s what morality ultimately boils down to: honesty. Intellectual honesty about what makes what moral and why. (Or about global warming, vaccines, etc.) It’s no longer good enough to say it’s in the Bible. In Psalms, God bestows his blessing on those who smash babies against rocks. We all know it’s wrong to do that, so the religious minded are forced to cherry-pick the Bible, for passages that justify their inherent ethical character – whether it’s giving to the poor or dreaming of stoning homosexuals to death while they masturbate. It’s a real grab bag, across America’s political-religious spectrum, but the Republican field is on record as being firmly against giving to the poor. Our economic morality, or intense lack thereof, is a nice example of religious thinking based on intellectual dishonesty. This is Ron Paul’s altar of Rand – not the Aqua Buddha guy. All we ever hear about, and are impoverished by, is supply-side bunk. I mean, when’s the last time you heard something about demand-side economics? You shouldn’t have to because that phrase is redundant. The sad thing is that people don’t know that…word. (Just a side note: I bought a $5 pizza the other day using Groupon. It was so cheap because enough people signed on to the deal, and lowered the price by buying in bulk. Apply this capitalist principle to government-negotiated prescription costs or single-payer health care, however, and God will punish the U.S. for being evil, atheist socialists. Probably with a hurricane. OK?) The foundation of ethics erodes quickly on a ground of lies. From our religion to our news sources, we are not an intellectually honest people. The instances of untruth on Fox News are myriad, but here’s their spin on the last words of Troy Davis: Convicted Cop Killer Troy Davis Told Family of Victim That He Was ‘Sorry for Their Loss’ Before Execution And here’s what he actually said , according to an AP reporter present: I’d like to address the MacPhail family. Let you know, despite the situation you are in, I’m not the one who personally killed your son, your father, your brother. I am innocent. The incident that happened that night is not my fault. I did not have a gun. All I can ask … is that you look deeper into this case so that you really can finally see the truth. I ask my family and friends to continue to fight this fight… How they got from that to saying he was ‘sorry’ is…confusing, like palm trees in Madison, Wisconsin, or how the tides work. American morality is not only conflated with our primitive religion, it’s held captive by our political leanings, and actually confused for empirical fact via motivated reasoning. The modern news consumer knows what they want to hear before they hear it, so we cherry-pick news sources the same way we do the bible. It’s called confirmation bias, and the entire Murdoch empire is built upon this model. (And, yes, while this does happen for anti-vaccination nuts and 9/11 Truthers on the left, it’s not at all an equivalent phenomenon.) Funny, these days the sentiments of an atheist are usually far more “Christian” than the thoughts of the religious. The aforementioned prominent atheist PZ Myers said this about Troy Davis: As I said before, I don’t care whether he was guilty or innocent, the death penalty is barbarous and irrevocable. There was no justice this evening, only vengeance. Bryan Fischer spokesman for the American Family Association, one of the sponsors of Rick Perry’s day of fasting and prayer, wrote an op-ed a couple weeks before Troy Davis’s murder entitled: Is the death penalty Christian? Of course it is. This was likely the longest possible way of saying that religion does not equate to morality. Religious people can be moral, and atheists need not be (GRRR STALIN!!!), but we just don’t seem to get this – unless we’re talking about Islam. As one small example of many, the town of Bay Minette, Alabama is now giving nonviolent offenders an option between jail time and church time. Seriously . I left off Troy Davis’s final-final words because they’re the most depressing of all: For those about to take my life, God have mercy on your souls. And may God bless your souls. And that’s the sad ironing of it all. The oppressed and the oppressors both live under God’s racist, murderous thumb. (And, of course, I know that a) many of our leaders who profess religiosity are lying and b) corporate power structures may conveniently overlap with religious goals but they’re not intrinsically religious.) Maybe it’s in poor taste to criticize the religious conviction of the victim, and religion has historically been a force of good in the civil rights movement, but I can’t help feel that religion in this country has reached its righteous limits. It’s a very old sentiment that religion keeps the masses obedient and docile, but as our understanding of the world has evolved, it seems clearer all the time. As Sam Harris argues that the belief of religious moderates provides cover to religious extremists, it’s my contention that the righteously religious (yes, they exist) lend a similar credence to barbaric fools who want to “fix” gay people and find no moral dilemma in state-sanctioned murder – despite the glaring edict “Thou shalt not kill.” Maybe I’m off entirely blaming religion for out contorted sense of morality. As labor writer Mike Elk recently pointed out in the context of Troy Davis, Don Blankenship, the Massey Energy CEO ultimately responsible for the death of 29 at their Upper Big Branch mine in’10, hasn’t served one day in jail. And NYC police dusted off a 150 year-old law against wearing masks to arrest protestors on Wall Street while the hedge fund, banking crooks who ruined the world economy have proven themselves immune to prosecution. This is, in essence, a continuing battle between the haves and the have-nots. (And as of Saturday, the police in lower Manhattan have gone into full-on gatekeeper mode, attacking and unlawfully arresting scores of peaceful protesters.) But looking at those wackos up on the Republican debate stage in Orlando, it seems obvious that religion is not helping. Remember the “Seven Mountains” of cultural power sought by the Dominionists: home, church, business/technology, arts/entertainment, education, and media. They seek not a convenient overlap between corporate control and religious dogma, but literal dominion over the entire kaboodle. The prevailing trend in countering our nation’s perverse, religion-infested, Republican-steeped sense of morality is to fight delusional fire with delusional fire. Democratic consultant, and founder of the American Values Network , Burns Strider is at the fore, fighting anti-social Republican dogma with the true values of Christianity (by hilariously pitting Jesus against Ayn Rand). But it’s past time to decide whether we want to be Old Testament thugs or New Testament hippies. It’s time to decide whether we want justice based in reality or justice based in fairy tales — whether religious, moral, or economic. __________ Ian Murphy is the evil editor of The BEAST . You should probably follow him on the Twitter .
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Lady Gaga dedicated a performance of her hit single Hair to Jamey Rodemeyer, a gay 14-year-old Buffalo-area high school freshmen who killed himself after enduring years of bullying over his sexuality. “We lost a Little Monster this week,” Gaga told a crowd at the iHeartRadio Festival Saturday. “I wanted to dedicate this song to him tonight because he was really young.” “I wrote this record about how your identity is really all you’ve got when you’re in school… So tonight, Jamey, I know you’re up there looking at us, and you’re not a victim. You’re a lesson to all of us. I know it’s a bit of a downer, but sometimes the right thing is more important than the music.” “I just wanna be myself / And I want you to love me for who I am,” Gaga sings. “I’ve had enough / This is my prayer / That I’ll die living just as free as my hair.” The singer announced last week that she wanted to meet with President Barack Obama and urge him to press for laws making bullying a federal hate crime. Rodemeyer, who had been a big Lady Gaga fan, even thanked her in his final blog post. In a YouTube video posted earlier this year, the teen had said how much he loved the singer. “Lady Gaga, she makes me so happy, and she lets me know that I was born this way,” he explained . Police are considering harassment, cyber-harassment or hate crimes charges for the students who bullied Rodemeyer.
Continue reading …NHS takes 70 referrals to treatment centre for new generation of designer drugs before its official launch The first NHS clinic to treat people addicted to so-called clubbing drugs has opened, with 70 referrals already after people found it online ahead of the official launch. Nobody knows the scale of the problem that drugs such as ketamine, mephedrone and GHB or GBL may be causing the predominantly young people who take them when they go clubbing. Existing drug treatment centres were set up primarily to tackle more established abused drugs, such as heroin and cocaine, while GPs and other doctors are not well versed in the effects and dangers of the new drugs. Dr Owen Bowden-Jones, an addiction psychiatrist who has set up the Club Drug Clinic with funding from Central and North-west London NHS Foundation Trust, said those who take club drugs tend to be younger, employed and sometimes affluent. They are often in relationships and don’t necessarily identify themselves as addicts. But the need for a treatment centre became apparent during a pilot phase of the clinic before the official launch, when 70 people found it through the internet and called up or asked for a referral from a doctor. One was a 19-year-old student studying economics. He had first snorted methadone three years before and enjoyed it, said Bowden-Jones, but had developed a “binging pattern”. He took 7 grams most days at a cost of about £140 a week, which caused him fatigue and damaged his academic performance. A second applicant was a 27-year-old man who lived with his partner and worked as an administrator. “He first used GBL five years ago. Now he uses 2ml every hour and sets the alarm clock so he can dose himself through the night,” said Bowden-Jones. He was desperate to avoid withdrawal symptoms, which the consultant psychiatrist described as “horrendous”, and included tremors, sweating, agitation, hallucination and insomnia. Another was a 31-year-old woman who worked for a recruitment agency and had used a variety of drugs with friends in her twenties. When her friends started cutting down, she found she could not. She was spending £600 a month on ketamine which had led to ulcers forming on the inside of her bladder, which caused her to pass blood. She may need her bladder removed. All three were being successfully treated for their addiction, said Bowden-Jones, who recognised there would be plenty of clubbers using drugs without consequences. “If someone is using a substance and not having any problems with it, our clinic is not the place for them. We are not making any judgment about people’s drug use. The resource is for people who run into trouble.” About a quarter of 16 to 19-year-olds have used an illegal drug in the past year, compared with 9% of the adult population, he said. Among clubbers, crack cocaine and heroin, which most clinics treat, are least used – at 13.6% and 6.7% respectively. Clubbers are more likely to try new designer drugs that are being constantly produced in a bid to outstrip the authorities. Last year, 41 new substances were produced and a further 20 appeared in the first four months of this year. An outcry over mephedrone, known as “meow meow”, which had been a “legal high” for some time and sold as plant food, led to it being banned last year. However, the British Crime Survey showed the move made little difference to the drug’s popularity. New or slightly altered chemical substances are turning up on the club scene much faster than they can be identified and banned. Drugs Health NHS Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …