Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 170)

I’ve seen Breitbart’s “conservative racism” demagoguery up close and personal a few times and I called him out on it on a panel. He’ll go on for hours on end about how liberals use racism as a tool against the tea party and conservatives because we’re just meanies. Because there is no racism in American conservatism. Breitbart’s real bugaboo is the accusation of racism against the patriotic Americans in the tea party. In his March 25 column ” 2010: A Race Odyssey ,” he writes: “As I have said over and over and over, the left has one trick that it will use again and again when its back is in the corner: shout “racist” in a crowded country…. Are we going to allow the left to use its despicable acts of lies and intimidation to shut up legitimate dissent on a subject that has nothing to do with race?” Maybe he can read his own commenters. Little Green Footballs: Of all the right wing race-baiting demagogues, Andrew Breitbart is one of the most duplicitous and dishonest, continually denying that any racism exists in the conservative/Tea Party movement, and whipping out the tired old “reverse racism” talking points every chance he gets. So let’s have a look at Breitbart’s own website, where commenters are responding to a video clip of President Obama speaking to the Congressional Black Caucus, with the ridiculously exaggerated title: Breitbart.tv » Obama Loses Cool At Black Caucus Dinner; ‘Stop Complaining’ And March . These comments are just from a quick skim through the first few pages. And keep in mind that these dozens and dozens of vile, openly racist remarks are right next to complaints that they’re being unjustly accused of racism. …and can I get a ham sammich with some grey poupon and an orange soda up in this mthrfckr. I gots to get on the plane and fly out west to meet with some rich white folk- gonna get me some money and Michele goin get her freak on at Nordstroms. […] That’s it Barry Zero. Jack everyone up maybe you can start a race war, then blame it on the tea party. […] Yep, he sure IS trying to start a race war. Flash mobs are just practice. Unions, blacks, and lefty loons in the street. Unions are the “muscle”, blacks are the “violence”, white azzwipes are the “youth”. The reaction to that stuff ain’t gonna be pretty. Obama wants to ride back into the White House on an ocean of blood. […] From the Massa’s lips to the negro plantation worker’s hips. “Yowsuh, boss man, weze gonna march.” Are blacks better off today than they were under Bush? Why do blacks vote for democrats and insure their poverty and second-class stature? Because the democrat plantation owners tell them to do so. Are these blacks that stupid??? Just askin’ Remember that the KKK was founded and run by democrats. Sheets Byrd among them. Margaret Sanger, a progressive, and the founder of abortion-on-demand centers, hated blacks and wanted all blacks aborted to keep the US pure. Yes she did. You can look it up. Listen, as bloggers, we’ve all had people flame comment threads, but that’s just vile and nasty stuff. Maybe Digby is right and they just don’t know what racism is? Breitbart is carving out a role as the great conservative defender of decent white folk who are falsely accused of racism. His readers certainly agree that that they are falsely accused. They just don’t seem to realize what racism is… {} And it isn’t the first time … Nah…..

Continue reading …
NHS cash crisis ‘will mean cuts to services or closure of departments’

NHS Confederation boss Mike Farrar warns of hits to jobs, A&E and maternity wards to stave off going bust The NHS’s cash crisis is so great that it will have to either cut services to patients or close accident and emergency and maternity units if it is to avoid going bust, ministers have been warned. Resolving the service’s deepening financial worries will involve decisions that will be politically unpalatable as any efforts to save money will arouse controversy, according to a senior NHS leader. Mike Farrar, chief executive of the NHS Confederation, writes in the Guardian that longer waiting times and worsening balance sheets at foundation trust hospitals show that the NHS is facing an “unprecedented financial challenge” that has not yet been widely recognised. The need to make £20bn of efficiency savings by 2015 “means our finances are under more strain than ever”, he says. “I am deeply concerned that the gravity of this problem for the NHS is not widely understood by patients and the public. There is a real risk we will sleepwalk into a financial crisis that patients will feel the full force of. “This could see the NHS forced to salami-slice its way out of financial trouble, cutting services and use of less effective treatments,” adds Farrar, whose organisation represents most NHS hospitals, primary care trusts, ambulance services and mental health trusts in England. “There are three scenarios,” he adds. “The NHS maintains service standards but goes bust while doing so; it sees standards slip but maintains financial balance; or it keeps improving and stays in the black. Clearly, we all want the third option.” His intervention comes days after the health secretary, Andrew Lansley, warned that 22 trusts, which between them run 60 hospitals, were on “the brink of financial collapse” because of punishing repayments under private finance initiative deals struck while Labour was in power. Farrar says remaining solvent while preserving quality of patient care “means radically re-orienting services to reduce hospital stays and offering new forms of care. Put bluntly, this means fewer beds and fewerhospital-based jobs.” Closing some hospital units as part of a drive to centralise key medical services will both drive up standards and save money, he argues. The health minister, Paul Burstow, last week admitted that a “wave” of decisions involving reconfiguring hospital services across England was imminent. Some will be agreed by local NHS bodies, though others may go to the Independent Reconfiguration Panel of advisers, with Lansley having the final say. A source close to Lansley said he would not shy away from hard decisions, including on reconfigurations. “Mike Farrar is right to highlight the challenges the NHS faces, after a decade of declining productivity and many years of Labour turning a blind eye to the problems some parts of the NHS have been facing,” the source said. “Tough solutions may be needed, but through our modernisation plans we will help the NHS overcome these challenges so that every part of the NHS delivers the best possible care to patients.” Dr Mark Porter, chairman of the British Medical Association’s consultants committee, said the NHS’s cash problems had been forced on it by ministers despite its best-ever performance. “The NHS is working better than ever: more and better treatments, highly regarded by most patients,” he said. “The financial crisis has been imposed by governments with the continual claim that money needs to be removed to be spent on different treatments. Porter said: “It’s time that the people started asking where this pile of money is and what it is being spent on. “Right now, the government appears to want both a financial crisis and also to spend billions of pounds on completely unnecessary structural reorganisations.” Dr Clare Gerada, chair of the Royal College of GPs, said the NHS was facing “the chaos of change associated with an unprecedented need to make cuts. “What is actually happening is that the public are being told that everything is OK, and that they can have choice and that we can have lovely new hospitals and it will be business as usual. This needs to stop.” Hospitals cannot be shut safely without causing harm to patients, she added. “Many hospitals have told me that they don’t have enough beds, and this is especially apparent during the winter months. “Hospitals run at very high bed occupancy already and shutting them piecemeal does not appear to make much sense, except as cost reduction,” said Gerada. NHS Health Health policy Liberal-Conservative coalition Denis Campbell guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
QUOTE: Saudi Arabian Women Given Right To Vote, Run for Office

“I haven’t been able to take my breath…We’re so excited. We believe it’s the response to our demands, the first step in our long struggle to get our rights.” –HATOON AL-FASSI, a university professor and women’s rights activist in Riyadh, responding to the news that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia will allow women to vote

Continue reading …

In his latest Moment of Clarity video, “The Police Are On The Wrong Side At The Occupy Wall Street Protests,” comedian Lee Camp questions the law enforcement officers that are working against their own interests in their response to the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York. While Camp’s take on the issue is meant to be humorous, he’s doing an important service in trying to raise awareness about the crimes of Wall Street, one of the key issues that the United States is dealing with. The organization maintains an active web site where they keep people far away from the action informed of their resistance movement. They say their mission is: Our Mission On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months. Like our brothers and sisters in Egypt, Greece, Spain, and Iceland, we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America. We also encourage the use of nonviolence to achieve our ends and maximize the safety of all participants. Who is Occupy Wall Street? Occupy Wall Street is leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions. The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%. The original call for this occupation was published by Adbusters in July; since then, many individuals across the country have stepped up to organize this event, such as the people of the NYC General Assembly and US Day of Rage. There’ll also be similar occupations in the near future such as October2011 in Freedom Plaza, Washington D.C. For more information or to help support the resistance, contact information is below… Where: Liberty Square ( How to get there ) Donations: NYCGA Donation Page Help & Directions: +1 (877) 881-3020 General Inquiries general@occupywallst.org Press Inquiries press@occupywallst.org Mail The UPS Store Re: Occupy Wall Street 118A Fulton St. #205 New York, NY 10038 Money orders only please, cannot cash checks yet. Non-perishable goods only. We can accept packages of any size. We’re currently low on food.

Continue reading …

In his latest Moment of Clarity video, “The Police Are On The Wrong Side At The Occupy Wall Street Protests,” comedian Lee Camp questions the law enforcement officers that are working against their own interests in their response to the Occupy Wall Street protests in New York. While Camp’s take on the issue is meant to be humorous, he’s doing an important service in trying to raise awareness about the crimes of Wall Street, one of the key issues that the United States is dealing with. The organization maintains an active web site where they keep people far away from the action informed of their resistance movement. They say their mission is: Our Mission On the 17th of September, we want to see 20,000 people to flood into lower Manhattan, set up beds, kitchens, peaceful barricades and occupy Wall Street for a few months. Like our brothers and sisters in Egypt, Greece, Spain, and Iceland, we plan to use the revolutionary Arab Spring tactic of mass occupation to restore democracy in America. We also encourage the use of nonviolence to achieve our ends and maximize the safety of all participants. Who is Occupy Wall Street? Occupy Wall Street is leaderless resistance movement with people of many colors, genders and political persuasions. The one thing we all have in common is that We Are The 99% that will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1%. The original call for this occupation was published by Adbusters in July; since then, many individuals across the country have stepped up to organize this event, such as the people of the NYC General Assembly and US Day of Rage. There’ll also be similar occupations in the near future such as October2011 in Freedom Plaza, Washington D.C. For more information or to help support the resistance, contact information is below… Where: Liberty Square ( How to get there ) Donations: NYCGA Donation Page Help & Directions: +1 (877) 881-3020 General Inquiries general@occupywallst.org Press Inquiries press@occupywallst.org Mail The UPS Store Re: Occupy Wall Street 118A Fulton St. #205 New York, NY 10038 Money orders only please, cannot cash checks yet. Non-perishable goods only. We can accept packages of any size. We’re currently low on food.

Continue reading …
Stelios to launch rival airline as relations with easyJet nosedive

The low-cost airline’s founder accuses his old company of smear tactics against him and violating agreements The long-running feud between Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou and easyJet has reached new heights of bitterness with the entrepreneur threatening to launch a rival airline and accusing the management of the company he founded of orchestrating a smear campaign against him. Haji-Ioannou, who gave up day-to-day control of the company more than 10 years ago, has repeatedly clashed with easyJet’s board in recent years over the way it was being run. But in what appeared to be a pre-emptive strike against the new venture, easyJet said on Monday that Haji-Ioannou “intends to set up an airline branded Fastjet”. The tycoon has already set up a website, fastjet.com. The new website says only: “Fastjet.com by Stelios. Coming soon!” against a vivid red background. Haji-Ioannou declined to give more details of the launch on Monday, saying only that he will not now abide by the terms of an agreement last October not to launch a rival, instead accusing easyJet of breaching its provisions by smearing him in off-the-record briefings to journalists. Set up by Haji-Ioannou in 1995 with a £5m loan from his shipping tycoon father, easyJet helped to pioneer low-cost air travel in Britain and challenge the stranglehold of national carriers such as British Airways. After the business floated in 2000, netting him a £280m fortune, he took his ideas into a host of other consumer ventures, launching, among other things, internet cafes, pizzas and hire cars all branded “easy”. Under the terms of its flotation in 2000, easyJet licensed the brand from Haji-Ioannou’s company easyGroup. The terms of the transaction meant easyJet could only use the brand for its core activity – running an airline – and limited any revenues it made from other activities to no more than a quarter of total sales. But following a boom in budget travel and new revenue lines such as baggage check-in fees, Haji-Ioannou went to court to argue that the agreement had been breached. The row was resolved in October of last year , with easyJet increasing the annual royalty it paid to easyGroup. Instead of getting nominal £1 a year easyGroup now receives a percentage of easyJet’s revenues, amounting to almost £9m for the first two years alone, and a possible £65m over 10 years. Under the terms of that agreement Haji-Ioannou, who remained on the board until last year, separately agreed “not to use his own name or a derivation of it to brand any other airline which flies to or from any country in Europe for a period of five years”. Nor is he allowed to hold a stake larger than 10% in another European airline. EasyJet agreed to pay him £300,000 a year in return for those commitments. Haji-Ioannou said that the non-compete agreement had been invalidated because a clause committing both parties to enhance the reputation of the easyJet brand as well as his personal reputation had been breached. A statement on his behalf said: “Sir Stelios strongly believes that the directors of easyJet, via a smear campaign conducted by off-the-record briefings to journalists, have repeatedly breached the clause, so he has terminated the effect of the letter for repudiatory breach and has rejected all payments offered under this letter since May 2011.” Easyjet, whose chief executive is former Guardian Media Group boss Carolyn McCall, said it would do whatever it could to protect itself and its shareholders, though it is unclear what they can do to prevent Haji-Ioannou’s plan. Since the signing of October’s agreement there have been signs that all was not well between Haji-Ioannou and the airline. He had been campaigning for the airline to make dividend payouts to shareholders, a wish that was granted by the company’s management last week. He has also disagreed with the company over the size of its aircraft fleet, believing it should not be expanded further without evidence that the new planes will make good profits. One immediate difficulty Haji-Ioannou faces in launching a rival is that he continues to own 26% stake in easyJet, while family members have an 11% stake through a company called Polys Holdings. The Haji-Ioannou family’s combined holding was worth around £550m at Monday’sclosing share price. There were reports that other shareholders were calling for him to sell immediately. It may not be easy, either, for Haji-Ioannou to achieve the success he had with easyJet when setting up a new airline. “When easyJet and Ryanair were established the market was very different. Ticket sales went through travel agents, the whole concept was quite new. They developed new routes and created new demand. Any newcomer is going to struggle. The low-hanging fruit is gone,” said Gert Zonneveld, an airlines analyst at City broker Panmure Gordon. Easyjet shares closed on Monday up 1p at 353p. Easyjet Airline industry Alex Hawkes guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Stelios to launch rival airline as relations with easyJet nosedive

The low-cost airline’s founder accuses his old company of smear tactics against him and violating agreements The long-running feud between Sir Stelios Haji-Ioannou and easyJet has reached new heights of bitterness with the entrepreneur threatening to launch a rival airline and accusing the management of the company he founded of orchestrating a smear campaign against him. Haji-Ioannou, who gave up day-to-day control of the company more than 10 years ago, has repeatedly clashed with easyJet’s board in recent years over the way it was being run. But in what appeared to be a pre-emptive strike against the new venture, easyJet said on Monday that Haji-Ioannou “intends to set up an airline branded Fastjet”. The tycoon has already set up a website, fastjet.com. The new website says only: “Fastjet.com by Stelios. Coming soon!” against a vivid red background. Haji-Ioannou declined to give more details of the launch on Monday, saying only that he will not now abide by the terms of an agreement last October not to launch a rival, instead accusing easyJet of breaching its provisions by smearing him in off-the-record briefings to journalists. Set up by Haji-Ioannou in 1995 with a £5m loan from his shipping tycoon father, easyJet helped to pioneer low-cost air travel in Britain and challenge the stranglehold of national carriers such as British Airways. After the business floated in 2000, netting him a £280m fortune, he took his ideas into a host of other consumer ventures, launching, among other things, internet cafes, pizzas and hire cars all branded “easy”. Under the terms of its flotation in 2000, easyJet licensed the brand from Haji-Ioannou’s company easyGroup. The terms of the transaction meant easyJet could only use the brand for its core activity – running an airline – and limited any revenues it made from other activities to no more than a quarter of total sales. But following a boom in budget travel and new revenue lines such as baggage check-in fees, Haji-Ioannou went to court to argue that the agreement had been breached. The row was resolved in October of last year , with easyJet increasing the annual royalty it paid to easyGroup. Instead of getting nominal £1 a year easyGroup now receives a percentage of easyJet’s revenues, amounting to almost £9m for the first two years alone, and a possible £65m over 10 years. Under the terms of that agreement Haji-Ioannou, who remained on the board until last year, separately agreed “not to use his own name or a derivation of it to brand any other airline which flies to or from any country in Europe for a period of five years”. Nor is he allowed to hold a stake larger than 10% in another European airline. EasyJet agreed to pay him £300,000 a year in return for those commitments. Haji-Ioannou said that the non-compete agreement had been invalidated because a clause committing both parties to enhance the reputation of the easyJet brand as well as his personal reputation had been breached. A statement on his behalf said: “Sir Stelios strongly believes that the directors of easyJet, via a smear campaign conducted by off-the-record briefings to journalists, have repeatedly breached the clause, so he has terminated the effect of the letter for repudiatory breach and has rejected all payments offered under this letter since May 2011.” Easyjet, whose chief executive is former Guardian Media Group boss Carolyn McCall, said it would do whatever it could to protect itself and its shareholders, though it is unclear what they can do to prevent Haji-Ioannou’s plan. Since the signing of October’s agreement there have been signs that all was not well between Haji-Ioannou and the airline. He had been campaigning for the airline to make dividend payouts to shareholders, a wish that was granted by the company’s management last week. He has also disagreed with the company over the size of its aircraft fleet, believing it should not be expanded further without evidence that the new planes will make good profits. One immediate difficulty Haji-Ioannou faces in launching a rival is that he continues to own 26% stake in easyJet, while family members have an 11% stake through a company called Polys Holdings. The Haji-Ioannou family’s combined holding was worth around £550m at Monday’sclosing share price. There were reports that other shareholders were calling for him to sell immediately. It may not be easy, either, for Haji-Ioannou to achieve the success he had with easyJet when setting up a new airline. “When easyJet and Ryanair were established the market was very different. Ticket sales went through travel agents, the whole concept was quite new. They developed new routes and created new demand. Any newcomer is going to struggle. The low-hanging fruit is gone,” said Gert Zonneveld, an airlines analyst at City broker Panmure Gordon. Easyjet shares closed on Monday up 1p at 353p. Easyjet Airline industry Alex Hawkes guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Countering the Anti-Abortion Bullies, Landlord Gives Them a Taste of Their Own Medicine

Click here to view this media This was an extremely refreshing change of pace from the usual stories we hear about abortion providers being harassed, bullied and threatened by these so-called “pro-life” groups who are always terribly concerned about inserting themselves into women’s reproductive health and the rights of the unborn, but not so terribly concerned about what happens to any child after they’re born. After that, you’re on your own and you’d better be ready to pull yourself up by your own bootstraps. Rachel Maddow talked to Voice of Choice’s Todd Stave about how he was pushing back at the harassment he received for just being a landlord to an abortion provider. You can read more about his group here — http://www.vochoice.org/ . And here’s more on what he was putting up with from these anti-abortion protesters — Anti-abortion protesters target clinic’s landlord outside child’s Md. school . I’m really glad to finally see someone doing some networking to push back at the harrassment and intimidation that those who support a woman’s right to make her own choices with her reproductive rights has had to put up with and with the tactics they’ve decided to use working, like calling the individuals and emailing those who are doing the harassing in response to their intimidation instead of just ignoring them. I hope everyone who is as sick of watching those who are still willing to risk their lives and their well being and who are as tired of this harrassment as I am stands with Stave’s group and helps them in this effort to push back at those who are doing the harassing and helps to put a stop to this behavior. It seems they don’t like it so much when it’s them who are receiving end of the phone calls and being called out for their harrassment and their views on abortion. They’re apparently much more comfortable harassing someone when no one knows who they are and can remain anonymous with their threats. I just hope if his movement catches on nation wide it might help to finally lessen the intimidation and threats abortion providers are putting up with week after week and day after day. It’s long overdue for that harrassment to stop. Maddow’ interview with Todd Stave below the fold. Click here to view this media

Continue reading …
Ed Miliband positions Labour as party for law-abiding silent majority

Labour leader’s conference speech sides with ‘people who don’t hack phones, loot shops, fiddle expenses or earn huge salaries’ Ed Miliband will target asset strippers and antisocial tenants on Tuesday as he vows to rebuild society so that the values of the decent majority are heard, ending a morally inverted system that rewards vested interests with the wrong values. In his major speech to the Labour party conference, he will also attack suggestions that company executives are the only ones that create prosperity, saying “the true wealth creators are not just an elite, but every man and woman who goes out to work”. In a strong moral judgment, historically avoided by Labour, he will say that those in work and contributing to their local community should be given preference over the jobless in allocating social housing. The speech is seen as critical to lifting the electorate’s doubts about his leadership qualities and the radical political direction he wants to take his party. It will be delivered against a backdrop of overnight polls suggesting the Tories may have taken a one-point lead, a dispiriting finding for Labour in view of the deepening recession and large spending cuts. Building on his central theme of his year-old leadership – greater responsibility at the top and at the bottom – he will offer a new bargain in which rich and poor can get ahead so long as they play by the rules of the quiet majority. He will also offer himself as the spokesman for the law-abiding silent majority, claiming: “There is a quiet crisis which does not get the headlines. It’s about people who don’t make a fuss, who don’t hack phones, loot shops, fiddle their expenses or earn telephone number salaries at the banks.” He will claim this quiet crisis suggests something fundamental and deep is gripping the country – “the failure of a system, a way of doing things, a set of rules”. He will draw a distinction between the wealth creators and the asset strippers, such as the private care home group Southern Cross, saying for years the country has been neutral between these two kinds of business. He will say: “For years they have been taxed the same, regulated the same, treated the same, celebrated the same.” In a potentially interventionist stance he will vow: “They won’t be by me.” The business secretary, Vince Cable, has already established a review, led by Professor John Kay, into how to reward long-termism in business. In a move designed to win back working class voters disillusioned by Labour’s perceived failure to tackle welfare cheats, he will say: “The hard truth is that we still have a system where reward for work is not high enough, where benefits are too easy to come by for those who abuse the system and don’t work for those who do the right thing.” He will say local authorities should be required in preparing social housing allocation policies not simply to take into account need, but also people’s contribution to society – “whether the recipients are working, whether they look after their property and are good neighbours”. He will say: “Our first duty should be to help the person who shows responsibility, and I say every council should recognise the contribution people are making.” He will also urge universities to do more to accept students from a wider range of social backgrounds. He will point out that in any one year “more than a quarter of our schools don’t even send five kids to the most competitive universities”. He will condemn the closed circles at the top of society that shut out talented young people. But in a sign of the problems Miliband faces in campaigning against the government, the Unison general secretary Dave Prentis drew loud applause at the largely somnolent conference when he called on Miliband to back strikes to protect public sector pensions. Prentis said: “It’s no time to sit on the fence when this country faces a stark choice between taking on the powerful and privileged, or letting the price be paid by the poor and the powerless. My members are no militants. But they will stand up for what’s fair, what’s right.” Miliband has said he did not support the unions’ day of action in June, and has urged the unions to negotiate rather than strike in November, arguing a strike would be a sign of failure. Len McCluskey, the Unite general secretary, said: “Ed will have to make his decisions and it is important that he is seen to be on the side of ordinary working people.” If he did not support the strike, McCluskey said, “that will be damaging for him. I don’t expect him to be on the picket lines, but I expect him to support the strikes.” He rejected any suggestion of a rupture with Miliband over the issue. Earlier at the conference, Ed Balls, the shadow chancellor, made a succession of apologies over the way in which Labour handled the economy in government, but refused to accept that the party had overspent prior to the banking crash in 2008. He claimed the government’s plans were not working and urged it to change course. Ed Miliband Labour conference 2011 Labour Labour conference Economic policy Economics Crime Welfare Trade unions Patrick Wintour guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

With such high unemployment numbers in the black community, this was inevitable — especially given Obama’s stated reluctance to target African Americans for specific help — even though unemployment is hitting them twice as hard: New cracks have begun to show in President Obama’s support amongst African Americans, who have been his strongest supporters. Five months ago, 83 percent of African Americans held “strongly favorable” views of Obama, but in a new Washington Post-ABC news poll that number has dropped to 58 percent. That drop is similar to slipping support for Obama among all groups. “There is a certain amount of racial loyalty and party loyalty, but eventually that was going to have to weaken,” said Andra Gillespie, a political scientist at Emory University, who studies African Americans. “It’s understandable given the economy.” African Americans have historically correlated approval ratings of the president to the unemployment rate, she said. The slip in the strongly favorable rating continues the decline Obama has seen among all groups, but black voters have been his staunchest supporters. Overall, they still hold a generally favorable view of the president with 86 percent saying they view him at least somewhat favorably. Gillespie’s view that the decline is tied to the disproportionately high jobless rate faced by African Americans correlates with the drop in their view of Obama’s handling of the economy. In July, only 54 percent of blacks said they thought Obama’s policies were making the economy better compared with 77 percent the previous year. Similarly, the White House has been sharply criticized in recent months by black political leaders, who argue that he has not done enough to help blacks. The unemployment rate for African Americans hit 16 percent this summer, the highest rate since 1984, and the members of the Congressional Black Caucus launched a jobs tour focused on the problem. This week the caucus is holding its annual legislative caucus in Washington, and the focus of a series of morning panels Wednesday was the lack of progress on jobs. Rep. Maxine Waters, who has been pushing Obama and publicly chided an administration official during the jobs tour to say the word “black” and directly address the needs of the community, said she would “continue to push the president and the Congress to adopt targeted policies to address the need.” Waters, who heads the CBC’s jobs initiative, said she saw the frustration that is registering in the president’s polls at the jobs fairs she attended. “I saw the kind of hopelessness that is setting in. People were not only discouraged, they came to try to get a job, but they didn’t really believe that something substantive was going to happen,” she said. Clyde McQueen, who is African American and runs a job placement firm in Kansas City, agreed. “The masses of young people and the first-time voter and entry-level workers are being so adversely impacted through downsizing at all levels,” said McQueen, who is attending the CBC meetings this week. “They are looking at the head of the government. When you are at the top, you take the blame.” And yet, MSNBC talking head and Nation writer Melissa Harris-Perry seems to think Obama’s dropping poll numbers are based on a more insidious form of racism: President Obama has experienced a swift and steep decline in support among white Americans—from 61 percent in 2009 to 33 percent now. I believe much of that decline can be attributed to their disappointment that choosing a black man for president did not prove to be salvific for them or the nation. His record is, at the very least, comparable to that of President Clinton , who was enthusiastically re-elected. The 2012 election is a test of whether Obama will be held to standards never before imposed on an incumbent. If he is, it may be possible to read that result as the triumph of a more subtle form of racism. Once again, a member of the media/academic Village misses the obvious: We didn’t have all these people struggling to find work during the Clinton administration. In fact, unemployment was at 4.7 percent – not like the double-digit, long-term unemployment we have now. Not this sense of hopelessness. It’s still the economy. Racism didn’t magically disappear, but the economy still matters more than anything else.

Continue reading …