Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 137)
#OccupyWallStreet: Figuring Out the Simmering Dissent Against ‘Money Corrupted Governance’

Since I last blogged about #OccupyWallStreet , the organic movement has picked up even more momentum . It now appears that New York City’s “established left” is set to join this “mini-movement,” injecting it with more energy and enthusiasm heading into next week. Chris Bowers at DailyKos has a nice run down of how this gathering “ has been growing rapidly ,” while the Daily Intel quoted a political consultant saying, ” it’s become too big to ignore .” I think the image that made everyone sit up and take note yesterday afternoon was the following image of hundreds pilots from United airlines showing up at the protest in their uniforms: That image somewhat shattered the narrative about this protest being some kind of gathering of hippie dippies with nothing better to do. As noted by Digby clearly “ something’s happening out there .” The story became even more surreal thanks to a video that appeared to show “ images of Wall Streeters drinking champagne from their balconies and kind laughing at these protesters. So what to make of all this. Matt Stoller spent few days with the protesters last week. He described it as a “church of dissent” at Naked Capitalism. Here are the two grafs that kind of hit me: What these people are doing is building, for lack of a better word, a church of dissent. It’s not a march, though marches are spinning off of the campground. It’s not even a protest, really. It is a group of people, gathered together, to create a public space seeking meaning in their culture. They are asserting, together, to each other and to themselves, “we matter.” Meaning is a fundamental human need. The act of politicization, of building any movement, is based on individual, and then group self-confidence. As Daniel Ellsberg said, “courage is contagious”. I’m reminded of how Howard Dean campaign worker and current law professor Zephyr Teachout characterized the early antiwar blogosphere and then-radical campaign of Dean, as church-like in their community-building elements. That’s what #OccupyWallStreet reminded me of. Even the general assemblies, where people would speak, and others would respond, had a rhythmic quality to them, similar to churches or synagogues I’ve attended. I worked closely with Zephyr up in Burlington in the Howard Dean campaign. Those grafs are poignant because I have been thinking last few days about the massive protests that broke out all over the U.S. in February of 2003 against the Iraq war, while reflecting on #OccupyWallStreet. The big picture similarities in the political context around these two “protests” are striking. Let me elaborate on this point with some more thoughts threading the basic themes around this particular movement after the jump. I remember how the professional political class in DC generally overlooked that “movement” against the Iraq war by dismissing it as essentially just another peace march by hippies from the coastal cities. Similar dynamic seems to be playing out again. Stoller noted how some angry “establishment liberals are frustrated that this protest has no top-down messaging strategy.” I vividly remember how those protests – attended by thousands of activists in major cities around the U.S. and the world – barely got any attention in the American traditional media. Once again the major traditional media are mostly in a black out mode. Whenever they are covering it, they are either giving it lip service or eying with not so hidden condescension. I don’t have a lot of hope that the American traditional media will “get” what is really happening down there in Lower Manhattan. These protesters don’t have a 24/7 political operation, disguised as “cable news network” pumping up a corporate funded “protest” movement. I am not confident about other traditional news outlets finding their way out of the terrible spin labeling these protests as “undemocratic movement.” I am not sure if they will able to understand the common thread about how this particular movement in NYC and similar ones around the globe is rooted in “ money corrupted governance .” Despite all of this, I will end this post with a positive note of possibility. Yet if folks think about the messaging concern is moot as the stories that are coming out of Liberty Plaza can be effortlessly threaded around the basic themes of getting Wall Street cash out of politics, creating jobs, and providing affordable education. It shouldn’t be that difficult for national progressive groups to go all in behind this “church of dissent” and give it more muscle in coming weeks, that could benefit an over arching progressive agenda coalesced around those themes. I wrote in my last post how this movement in New York City has given progressive groups a massive opportunity. It looks like the energy is only building in New York and it is spreading around the country. The question remains whether the established players in the national progressive community, including elected officials from the Democratic Party will dive in and go all in. This is their chance. Hopefully they don’t blow it like they did back in 2003. Don’t forget there are solidarity demonstrations this weekend…possibly one near you. Make sure to check out Facebook for more details .

Continue reading …
Amanda Knox ‘is lucky Italy doesn’t have death penalty’

Prosecutor in Meredith Kercher murder appeal reminds court Knox and Raffaele Sollecito would risk lethal injection in US The prosecution has wound up its case against Amanda Knox by saying that “fortunately” she and her Italian former boyfriend could not be executed for the murder of British student Meredith Kercher. It was a reminder that, in her US home state of Washington, Knox would risk lethal injection or even the gallows if her appeal were rejected. Last week, the prosecution asked for the sentences passed on Knox and Raffaele Sollecito to be increased to life. “They killed [Kercher] for nothing,” said prosecution counsel Manuela Comodi. “But they killed her. And it is for that reason they should be found guilty and given the maximum sentence which, fortunately, in Italy is not the death sentence.” The tangled case, which has fascinated amateur detectives the world over, is due to end on Monday. In line with Italian court practice, each of the parties has a final chance to sway the two professional and six lay judges who will decide. Comodi was speaking after her colleague Giuliano Mignini, who oversaw the original investigation, made an emotional speech in which he claimed, as evidence of the appellants’ guilt, their reaction to gruesome images of the murder scene shown in court. “At the trial, Amanda never looked at them. Never. Raffaele looked every so often with one eye – icy, expressionless. Here … Amanda had her eyes cast down. Raffaele looked away,” said Mignini. “These are little things that are important.” He went on to tell the court the Knox family had spent a million dollars on their campaign to establish her innocence. And, to the visible astonishment of defence lawyers, he ended by quoting a US tourist in Perugia, who had apparently said: “They are guilty – but will get away with it.” The defence argument is that a third person, Rudy Guede from the Ivory Coast, who has been convicted of the murder, killed Kercher on his own during a break-in. Mignini described him as a “poor black man” having earlier, pointedly, referred to the appellants as being “of good families”. The prosecution argued the defence had yet to explain two points: evidence that a broken window in the flat Knox shared with Kercher could not have been smashed by an intruder because the shutters were closed, and footprints in the bathroom that could not have been Guede’s. Comodi said they were Sollecito’s, adding: “They didn’t belong to Martians.” Amanda Knox Meredith Kercher Italy Europe United States John Hooper guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …

What a wonderful idea for a protest . Check out the New Bottom Line Coalition , and see what’s going on near you: As the old saying goes, “another day, another dawn.” But in this case it was another dawn, another bad day … for Bank of America. Footage and report courtesy of MASSUNITING . Less than 24 hours after announcing a planned mass layoff of more than 30,000 employees, local residents crashed a posh company-sponsored breakfast at the Seaport Hotel in Boston. The event, billed as a “government affairs forum,” was chaired by Robert Gallery, President of Bank of America-Massachusetts. A pair of local residents made a breakfast delivery of their own to event attendees, handing out muffins ornamented with “Bank of America: Bad for America, Bad for Massachusetts” flags. The activists distributed one muffin for every thousand pink slips the financial giant will hand out in the coming months. And as Gallery took the podium, more than a dozen concerned citizens took to the parking garages and streets surrounding the hotel and convention center. Within twenty minutes, local residents had leafleted the cars of every event attendee, as well as hundreds of commuters passing by the hotel and convention center. Last week’s actions marked the second day of protests against Bank of America and its corporate leadership. On Monday, dozens of protesters descended on bank branches in Fields Corner and Grove Hall, calling on the financial giant to take concrete steps to clean up the economic mess it helped to create. Organizers promised to continue demonstrations against Bank of America and other big banks throughout September. Use your imagination! I really love this one — I’d love to know how they did it: From another New Bottom Line action in Washington State: At sunrise, each member of the Association of Washington Business Policy Summit received a call in their plush suite at Suncadia. When they picked up the phone, this is the message they heard: “Good morning! This is a wake up call. While Wall Street Bankers, corporate CEOs and their lobbyists go to wine tastings, play golf and plot how to maintain special interest tax breaks, middle class and poor families are struggling to make ends meet . Today, you will notice hundreds of community members here to protest at the Showdown at Suncadia. Our message: It’s time Wall Street Banks and wealthy CEOs pay their fair share. ”

Continue reading …
Japanese ‘Noah’s ark’ disaster capsule goes on sale

Floating vessel can hold four adults and could save lives, manufacturers claim A Japanese company has developed a miniature version of Noah’s ark in case Japan is hit by another massive earthquake and tsunami – a floating capsule that looks like a huge tennis ball. Engineering company Cosmo says its “Noah” shelter is made from enhanced fibreglass and could save users from disasters such as the earthquake and tsunami on 11 March that devastated Japan’s northern coast and left nearly 20,000 people dead or missing. The company’s president, Shoji Tanaka, said the capsule could hold four adults and had survived many crash tests. It has a lookout window and breathing holes, and could also be used as a toy house for children. The company said it had completed the capsule earlier this month and had received 600 orders. Japan Engineering Natural disasters and extreme weather guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Phone hacking: Neville Thurlbeck says ‘truth will out’

Former News of the World senior reporter breaks silence, saying he ‘took no part in the matter which led to his dismissal’ Neville Thurlbeck, the former News of the World chief reporter, has sensationally broken his silence on the phone-hacking scandal, saying he “took no part in the matter which led to his dismissal”. In his first public statement since he was arrested and bailed for alleged phone hacking in April, Thurlbeck said the “truth will out” and “those responsible will eventually be revealed”. In a clear shot across his former employer’s bows, Thurlbeck claimed there was “much I could have said publicly to the detriment of News Interntional”, but had so far chosen “not to do so”. Thurlbeck had applied for “interim relief” at an employment tribunal hearing scheduled to be heard on Friday but pulled out late on Thursday. His solicitor Nathan Donaldson, employment partner at DWF, also issued a statement on Friday confirming that Thurlbeck was continuing his action against News Group Newspapers, the News International subsidiary that published the News of the World, “for unfair dismissal and whistleblowing”. The Guardian revealed more than two years ago the existence of a “for Neville” email – believed to be a reference to Thurlbeck – sent to private investigator Glenn Mulcaire, which contained a transcript of messages left on a mobile phone belonging to Professional Footballers’ Association chief executive Gordon Taylor. The “for Neville” email contradicted the defence that News International had maintained until late 2010, that phone-hacking was limited to Mulcaire and one “rogue reporter” on the News of the World, former royal editor Clive Goodman. Both were jailed in early 2007 for phone-hacking offences. Thurlbeck was due to attend an “interim relief hearing” about his unfair dismissal claim on Friday, but withdrew because the “issues to be determined by the employment tribunal will require key individuals within the News Group Newspapers being cross-examined”. His solicitors added that “unfortunately” Friday’s hearing was limited to “a review of papers” and because of this “procedural limitation” Thurlbeck and his legal team decided to withdraw. They wanted to ensure the benefits of a full hearing where “complete disclosure” from the parties would be made. The 49-year-old former chief reporter at the News of the World was sacked by Rupert Murdoch’s News International earlier this month, prompting him to sue his former employer for unfair dismissal. “Scotland Yard has now made me aware of the reason for my dismissal, a reason which News International has withheld from me for almost a month,” Thurlbeck said, in a statement issued by his solicitors that shows he is fighting back against his former employer. “For legal reasons, I am unable to go into the reason cited. However, I will say this. I took no part in the matter which has led to my dismissal after 21 years of service,” he added. “I say this most emphatically and with certainty and confidence that the allegation which led to my dismissal will eventually be shown to be false. And those responsible for the action, for which I have been unfairly dismissed, will eventually be revealed.” Thurlbeck also claimed that for more than two years, News International had accepted he was not responsible for the matter in question and there was “no valid or reliable evidence now to support their sudden volte face. At the length, truth will out.” Thurlbeck also said he would “fight my case to the end” and accused News International of “giving ‘off the record’ briefings” to the press. “This has compelled me to speak for the first time since my name became linked to the phone hacking scandal through the ‘For Neville’ email more than two years ago,” he said. “I would request that

Continue reading …
Actor Leisha Hailey thrown off flight for kissing girlfriend Camila Grey

Southwest cabin crew member allegedly asked the couple to stop after a passenger complained Celebrity airport arrests were once big, splashy affairs – Paul McCartney getting arrested in Japan for marijuana possession, or a frenzied Courtney Love flinging her underwear around Heathrow. Now, the frustrations of air travel in the post 9/11 age have generated a different sort of friction – in which one person’s idea of free expression seems to run smack into the airlines’ definition of inexcusably bad behaviour. Just ask Leisha Hailey, a musician and moderately well known television actor who was thrown off her flight in El Paso, Texas, this week after she kissed her girlfriend and bandmate, Camila Grey, in the seat next to her. A cabin crew member, apparently responding to a passenger complaint, told Hailey that Southwest was a “family airline” and asked her to stop. By the time Hailey and Grey had stopped swearing and cursing, they were back in the airport, waiting for the next flight. Southwest later insisted the problem was the abusive language, not the kiss. “The conversation escalated to a level that was better resolved on the ground, as opposed to in flight,” it said. After days of incensed reaction from Hailey, her friends and the lesbian and gay community, however, Southwest backtracked, saying it was offering a full refund for the flight and had “reached out to extend goodwill” – a form of words that fell just short of an outright apology. Earlier this month, the lead singer of Green Day, Billie Joe Armstrong, was escorted off another Southwest flight in California because he refused to pull up his sagging trousers when asked. “Don’t you have better things to do than worry about that?” he retorted. The flight attendant responded: “Pull your pants up or you’re getting off the plane.” Armstrong complained, loudly, after he and his companion were taken back to the airport, and Southwest ended up apologising. He was luckier than Deshon Marman, a college American football player who suffered his own baggy trouser incident on a US Airways flight in June. He ended up in handcuffs, under arrest and charged with trespassing, resisting arrest, and battery on a police officer. The charges were later dropped, and Marman is now suing the airline. What these episodes have in common is that the affected passengers have all complained loudly and used their fan base to whip up outrage. Advocacy groups have also muscled in. The Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation pointed out that Southwest is a corporate sponsor and urged everyone to do the right thing. A black advocacy group called Color of Change pointed to the different treatment handed out to Marman, who is black, and Armstrong, who is white, and said it was a clear instance of race discrimination. “The vastly different treatment of these two passengers underscores the need for greater oversight and training by the airlines,” the organisation’s executive director Rashad Robinson said. The airlines, in turn, appear to be running scared from the negative publicity. Kevin Smith, the film director, has not stopped making hay over an incident in February last year when Southwest threw him off a flight, supposedly because he was too fat. Southwest, once again, offered “heartfelt apologies” but also said he had been removed “for the safety and comfort of all customers”. The L Word Gay rights Television Drama United States Texas Air transport Andrew Gumbel guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Teenager holding baby is shot in botched west London gang attack

Mother and two friends are hurt in shooting, while 11-month-old boy escapes injury A teenage mother has been shot in the street with two friends while clutching her 11-month-old son in her arms. Jessica Chrichlow, 18, collapsed to the ground alongside two sisters – named locally as Sammy, 17, and Alex, 19 – after being caught in the crossfire of a botched gang attack, witnesses said on Friday morning. Detective Chief Inspector Mick Foote said: “It was a random, reckless act and we are fortunate we are not dealing with a fatal shooting here.” Police said it was “hugely fortunate” that the baby escaped injury. The three victims had been outside in John Fearon Walk, north Kensington, west London, enjoying balmy temperatures when the attacker got off a bike and screamed “motherfucker” at the group, a neighbour, who did not want to be named, said. Foote added: “I do not believe the girls were the intended targets. What’s particularly devastating is that the young girl was carrying a young child. “This was totally unprovoked.” As a hunt was launched for several young men seen on bicycles on the west London housing estate last night, the officer said he was “working on the basis” that the shooting was gang-related. One neighbour said her 12-year-old daughter saw the shooting from her bedroom window. Jacky Cinesey said: “I have sent her to school in tears today. These girls were just outside enjoying the sunshine. It’s horrifying.” Gun crime London Crime guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Dmitry Medvedev: ‘Putin is more popular than I am’

Outgoing Russian president denies political rivalry with current prime minister, claiming he was happy to step aside Russia’s outgoing president, Dmitry Medvedev, agreed to step down because he believes Vladimir Putin is more popular, he said. “I note that prime minister Putin, without a doubt, is currently the most authoritative politician in our country,” Medvedev said in an interview to the country’s three state-run television stations. “His rating is slightly higher.” Medvedev has been the target of ridicule in Russia since Putin announced he would return to the presidency next year. The interview is to be aired on Friday but a transcript was pre-released by the Kremlin. Putin has said he will make Medvedev his prime minister. “My main ambition is to be of use to my country and my people,” Medvedev said. He stressed that he and Putin represented “the same political force” and dismissed the idea of competition between them. “Can you imagine a situation where, for example, Barack Obama started competing with Hillary Clinton?” he asked, apparently forgetting the rivalry that divided the two in the run-up to the 2008 US presidential election. Medvedev brushed off the head of state-owned television channel NTV, Vladimir Kulistikov, when he asked: “What’s the point of elections if everything is already decided?” The ruling United Russia party’s support for Putin and Medvedev was “merely a party recommendation on who to support in the elections, and nothing more,” he said. “The vote is exercised by the people – and these are not empty words,” Medvedev said. “Any politician can ‘fly’ in the elections.” “No one is insured from anything – what predictability?” Putin is likely to win the presidential election in March 2012. The Kremlin controls major television media. Russia’s main liberal opposition, the People’s Freedom party, has been refused registration for a parliamentary vote due in December. Other opposition parties, including the communists and the far-right Liberal Democratic party, are considered Kremlin-friendly. “Let the people decide whom to vote for, who has more authority,” Medvedev said. “And only people, only our citizens, are able to place the final emphasis, voting for this or that person or political force, or rejecting it. That’s democracy.” Dmitry Medvedev Vladimir Putin Russia Europe Miriam Elder guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Victory for Burma reformers over dam project

Work on £2.3bn Myitsone dam halted after Burma’s president says he has to ‘act according to the desire of the people’ Burma will suspend a massive Chinese hydropower project on the Irrawaddy river after the country’s president joined a chorus of concerns raised by environmentalists, democracy activists and tribal militias. The proposed halting of the $3.6bn (£2.3bn) Myitsone dam is a remarkable step for a government that has long ruled by military fiat, but appears this time to have put public and ecological concerns ahead of economic priorities and the interests of its powerful neighbour. In a rare concession to opposition groups, President Thein Sein informed parliament on Friday that construction of the 3,600MW project on Burma’s most important river should be in halted because it was against the will of the people. The decision will be seen as a victory for Aung San Suu Kyi , the leader of Burma’s pro-democracy opposition. In August, the Nobel laureate called for the plan to be reassessed and greater efforts be made to protect the Irrawaddy and the interests of people who would be affected. Chief among them are the residents of the Kachin region, which would have been flooded by a reservoir the size of New York City, forcing the displacement of 10,000 people and submerging important cultural sites. Earlier this year, the Kachin Independence Organisation broke a 17-year-ceasefire after warning that it would fight to block the project. Environmental groups warned that the dam, which was to be built by the China Gezhouba Group on the confluence of the Mali and N’Mai, would inundate one of the world’s biodiversity hotspots and pose a major risk in the event of an earthquake. The Burma Rivers Network, an NGO which represents communities along the river, released what it says is a leaked environmental assessment jointly commissioned by the Burmese and Chinese authorities that recommends scrapping the project. There has clearly been a tussle inside the government over the issue. Earlier this month, the minister for electric power, U Zaw Min, insisted the plan would go ahead. Senior environmental officials, however, have urged caution. Thein Sein may be taking a risk with the announcement. His government took over this year from the junta that ruled Burma for decades and is still thought to be under the influence of the military. Burma Aung San Suu Kyi Jonathan Watts guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Ofcom lays down the law on raunchy videos before the 9pm watershed

UK broadcasters told to be more careful about showing sexually explicit music videos before the 9pm watershed Ofcom has ordered UK broadcasters to be more careful about showing sexually explicit music videos before the 9pm watershed. The regulator issued new guidance on Friday, focusing on the visual as well as the verbal content of some music videos in a bid to tighten the enforcement of existing watershed rules. Broadcasters have been told to take particular care masking or editing offensive language where possible, in order to protect children. The new guidelines follow recent scrutiny by the regulator into pre-watershed programmes that it judged to be either unsuitable or close to unsuitable for children. Ofcom’s move also follows the publication of a government-backed report in the summer by Mothers’ Union chief executive, Reg Bailey, which called for tighter control of sexualised imagery including raunchy music videos. It also follows the controversy over last December’s The X Factor final, which attracted 4,500 complaints to Ofcom due to its raunchy performances by Rihanna and Christina Aguilera. Ofcom’s warning to broadcasters was accompanied by new research involving more than 1,000 parents and primary carers which showed that 11% of parents found music videos the greatest cause of concern regarding the kind of programmes shown before the watershed. Other types of programme that most concerned parents were soaps (14% of respondents) and films (14%) followed by reality programmes (12%). However, the research indicated that 58% of parents and primary carers surveyed were not concerned by what their children had watched on television before 9pm in the past 12 months. Less than a quarter – 24% – said they were “fairly concerned”, although 9% said they were “very concerned”. Just under a quarter (23%) of the 768 teenagers surveyed said that in the past 12 months they had seen something on TV before the watershed that had made them uncomfortable or had offended them. Earlier this week Ofcom upheld complaints against the music channel Greatest Hits TV for showing a quarter-hour segment of videos by the US rap star 50 Cent at 9am. The watchdog upheld a series of complaints about the scenes depicted in the videoes which included “dancing with two topless female performers in a sexualised manner” in the music video for the song P.I.M.P, as well as images of two females being walked like dogs with leashes. The video for the song I Like the Way She Do It contained the lyrics: “It never enough she like it rough. We keep it going and we switch positions, listen”. Another video for the song If I Can’t contained the words “pussies”,”nigger”,”motherfucker” and “fuck”. Ofcom ruled the screening was a “clear breach of broadcasting code” and put licence holders Mushroom TV “on notice” following the incident. This year has seen an increase in efforts to curb the broadcast of raunchy pop videos at times when children were watching. Following the Bailey report, prime minister David Cameron called for a Downing Street summit of retailers, advertisers, broadcasters, magazine editors, video games and music industry chiefs and regulators to gauge progress over issues including the exposure of children to sexualised imagery, which is due to take place in October. The summit is still due to take place according to Ofcom, but it is unclear if Cameron will accede to calls in Bailey’s report for legislation in 18 months if demands for tighter voluntary controls are not implemented. •

Continue reading …