‘Brutal death’ of student Meredith Kercher has been forgotten as Amanda Knox appeal against murder conviction reaches end Members of Meredith Kercher’s family has said that the “brutal death” of the British student has been forgotten as the appeal by Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito against their murder conviction reaches a climax. “I think Meredith has been hugely forgotten,” said Kercher’s sister Stephanie during a hastily called and occasionally chaotic press conference in Perugia on Monday with Kercher’s mother Arline and brother Lyle. “Everyone needs to remember the brutality of what happened and everything she went through, the fear and the terror and not knowing why.” “It is very hard to find forgiveness at this time,” said Lyle Kercher. “Four years is a very long time but on the other hand it is still raw.” Defending the display of gruesome crime scene photographs in court, he added: “It was a way to reinforce how horrific it really was. You would find it hard to forgive if that was your sibling.” But as they vouched for the soundness of the convictions, Kercher’s sister Stephanie also suggested the family would accept the court’s decision if it overturned them when two judges and six jurors return their verdict later this evening. “If they decide on the information available to them and not on the media hype, justice will be hopefully be done,” said Stephanie. “Whichever way that will be we will have to deal with this evening.” Asked about the PR campaign organised by the Knox family to clear their daughter Amanda, Lyle said “any loving parent” would have done the same, but added that the Kercher’s family lawyer, Francesco Maresca, who has been sustaining the prosecution’s case during the trials, was “constantly battling against a very large PR machine”. Asked if she would “reach out” to the Knox family if their daughter was acquitted, Arline Kercher said: “I don’t know really. We need to find out what happened.” Before the press conference, Maresca ruled out the possibility of tension in the court room when the Kerchers and the Knox family find themselves shoulder to shoulder this evening to hear the sentence. “It is more the wait that creates tension, and the Kerchers are more interested in remembering their daughter outside the courtroom. Their attention is on that.” Arline was the most adamant of the family members that Italian justice had performed well. “I think it is quite good,” she said, pointing out that the trial judge had produced a 400-page document giving the reasons for the conviction. “In England you don’t have that,” she said, adding that evidence had been found against Knox and Sollecito beyond the disputed DNA evidence. Meredith’s death had left a “huge absence,” for the Kerchers, said Lyle. “It is as if she went on an extended break and we haven’t seen her come back as yet.” Meredith Kercher Amanda Knox Italy Europe Tom Kington guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …After shows by Kanye West and Balenciaga, Paris fashion week continues to roll on. Here, the Guardian’s deputy fashion editor Imogen Fox goes through the latest looks from Comme des Garcons, Junya Watanabe, Roland Mouret and many more
Continue reading …After shows by Kanye West and Balenciaga, Paris fashion week continues to roll on. Here, the Guardian’s deputy fashion editor Imogen Fox goes through the latest looks from Comme des Garcons, Junya Watanabe, Roland Mouret and many more
Continue reading …Nobel prize for medicine given to three biologists for work on immune system, but one of them died just days ago The Nobel prize season began under a dark cloud on Monday when it emerged that one of the winners of the freshly minted medicine award had passed away days before. The world’s most prestigious prizes honour scientists and other leading figures for exceptional contributions to their fields, but the prize rules state that they cannot be awarded posthumously. Officials at the Nobel assembly will meet over the next few days to decide whether the prize stands or needs to be amended. This year’s prize for medicine was given to three biologists whose work on the immune system opened up new avenues in the fight against infections and diseases . American Bruce Beutler , 53, and French biologist Jules Hoffmann , 70, share half of the 10 million Swedish kronor (£934,000) prize money, with the remainder earmarked for the 68-year-old Canadian-born Ralph Steinman . But when the Nobel committee tried on Monday to contact Dr Steinman, a researcher at Rockefeller University in New York, they heard that he had died from pancreatic cancer on Friday. Steinman had been treating himself with a therapy based on his own research into the body’s immune system, but died after a four-year battle with the disease. Göran Hansson, secretary general of the Nobel committee , told the Guardian: “We never inform the winners in advance. I couldn’t get through to Dr Steinman for obvious reasons, so I sent an email that was picked up by his daughter who contacted the president of Rockefeller University. He then contacted us with the news.” Hansson said it was too early to speculate on whether Steinman’s part of the prize would stand. Since 1974, a Nobel prize can only be handed out posthumously if the recipient dies between the award being announced and the traditional ceremony in December. “We expect to take a decision on this with the Nobel Foundation within the next few days. Right now our thoughts go to Dr Steinman’s family and collaborators. We are shocked by the sadness,” Hansson said. The Nobel assembly regularly takes decades to recognise achievements worthy of the prize and many winners are retired by the time they receive the honour. But Hansson said this appeared to be the first time since the rules were updated in 1974 that the prize had been awarded to someone who was deceased. “This is a unique situation we are facing,” he said. Prior to 1974, a person could be awarded a prize posthumously if they had already been nominated before February of the same year. This was the case for Erik Axel Karlfeldt, who won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1931, and Dag Hammarskjöld, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1961. In a statement released on Monday , Marc Tessier-Lavigne, president of Rockefeller University, said the university was “delighted” that the Nobel Foundation had recognised Steinman’s “seminal discoveries” concerning the body’s immune system. “But the news is bittersweet, as we also learned this morning from Ralph’s family that he passed a few days ago after a long battle with cancer. Our thoughts are with Ralph’s wife, children and family,” the statement said. Steinman’s daughter, Alexis, added: “We are all so touched that our father’s many years of hard work are being recognised with a Nobel Prize. He devoted his life to his work and his family, and he would be truly honoured.” The president of the Royal Society, Sir Paul Nurse – himself a Nobel laureate – said: “This is a great tragedy. Ralph Steinman’s work was ahead of its time and he waited too long for the Nobel prize. To die just days before its announcement is almost too much to bear. He will be remembered as one of the great immunologists of our time.” The award panel at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute in Stockholm praised the researchers for work that “revolutionised our understanding of the immune system by discovering key principles for its activation”. The announcement marked the start of more than a week of Nobel awards, with prizes for physics and chemistry due on Tuesday and Wednesday. The prizes for literature, peace and economics follow on Thursday, Friday and next Monday respectively. Decades of meticulous laboratory work led the three scientists to piece together how humans and animals defend themselves against potentially lethal bacteria and other microbes. Beutler, who is head of genetics at the Scripps Research Institute in California, and Hoffmann, director of research at the French national centre for scientific research (CNRS), discovered one of the body’s first lines of defence, where the immune system senses and destroys bacteria, fungi and viruses, and initiates inflammation to block their attacks. Steinman’s work in 1973 shed light on the immune system’s second line of defence, where sentinel “dendritic” cells direct the body’s killer T cells to attack foreign organisms. For many years, his work was dismissed as flawed by the wider scientific community. Before news of Steinman’s death emerged, Lars Klareskog, who chairs the prize-giving Nobel Assembly, said of the trio’s work: “I think that we will have new, better vaccines against microbes and that is very much needed now with the increased resistance against antibiotics.” Their discoveries are expected to lead to other treatments that combat cancer and “autoimmune” diseases, where the immune system becomes faulty and attacks healthy tissues in the body. One hope is for vaccines that marshall the immune system to fight tumours. The first such therapeutic cancer vaccine, Provenge, was approved for use in the US last year. In an interview with Bloomberg News, Beutler said: it was “incredible” to win a Nobel prize with Hoffman and Steinman: “My idea right from the beginning, I guess, was to dismantle the immune system one gene at a time so we could track the mutations that cause problems. “I woke up in the middle of the night, and glanced at my cellphone, and the first thing I saw was a message line that just said the words ‘Nobel Prize’. Needless to say, I grabbed it and started looking at the messages. Wow.” Nobel prizes Science prizes People in science Ian Sample guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Nobel prize for medicine given to three biologists for work on immune system, but one of them died just days ago The Nobel prize season began under a dark cloud on Monday when it emerged that one of the winners of the freshly minted medicine award had passed away days before. The world’s most prestigious prizes honour scientists and other leading figures for exceptional contributions to their fields, but the prize rules state that they cannot be awarded posthumously. Officials at the Nobel assembly will meet over the next few days to decide whether the prize stands or needs to be amended. This year’s prize for medicine was given to three biologists whose work on the immune system opened up new avenues in the fight against infections and diseases . American Bruce Beutler , 53, and French biologist Jules Hoffmann , 70, share half of the 10 million Swedish kronor (£934,000) prize money, with the remainder earmarked for the 68-year-old Canadian-born Ralph Steinman . But when the Nobel committee tried on Monday to contact Dr Steinman, a researcher at Rockefeller University in New York, they heard that he had died from pancreatic cancer on Friday. Steinman had been treating himself with a therapy based on his own research into the body’s immune system, but died after a four-year battle with the disease. Göran Hansson, secretary general of the Nobel committee , told the Guardian: “We never inform the winners in advance. I couldn’t get through to Dr Steinman for obvious reasons, so I sent an email that was picked up by his daughter who contacted the president of Rockefeller University. He then contacted us with the news.” Hansson said it was too early to speculate on whether Steinman’s part of the prize would stand. Since 1974, a Nobel prize can only be handed out posthumously if the recipient dies between the award being announced and the traditional ceremony in December. “We expect to take a decision on this with the Nobel Foundation within the next few days. Right now our thoughts go to Dr Steinman’s family and collaborators. We are shocked by the sadness,” Hansson said. The Nobel assembly regularly takes decades to recognise achievements worthy of the prize and many winners are retired by the time they receive the honour. But Hansson said this appeared to be the first time since the rules were updated in 1974 that the prize had been awarded to someone who was deceased. “This is a unique situation we are facing,” he said. Prior to 1974, a person could be awarded a prize posthumously if they had already been nominated before February of the same year. This was the case for Erik Axel Karlfeldt, who won the Nobel Prize in Literature in 1931, and Dag Hammarskjöld, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1961. In a statement released on Monday , Marc Tessier-Lavigne, president of Rockefeller University, said the university was “delighted” that the Nobel Foundation had recognised Steinman’s “seminal discoveries” concerning the body’s immune system. “But the news is bittersweet, as we also learned this morning from Ralph’s family that he passed a few days ago after a long battle with cancer. Our thoughts are with Ralph’s wife, children and family,” the statement said. Steinman’s daughter, Alexis, added: “We are all so touched that our father’s many years of hard work are being recognised with a Nobel Prize. He devoted his life to his work and his family, and he would be truly honoured.” The president of the Royal Society, Sir Paul Nurse – himself a Nobel laureate – said: “This is a great tragedy. Ralph Steinman’s work was ahead of its time and he waited too long for the Nobel prize. To die just days before its announcement is almost too much to bear. He will be remembered as one of the great immunologists of our time.” The award panel at Sweden’s Karolinska Institute in Stockholm praised the researchers for work that “revolutionised our understanding of the immune system by discovering key principles for its activation”. The announcement marked the start of more than a week of Nobel awards, with prizes for physics and chemistry due on Tuesday and Wednesday. The prizes for literature, peace and economics follow on Thursday, Friday and next Monday respectively. Decades of meticulous laboratory work led the three scientists to piece together how humans and animals defend themselves against potentially lethal bacteria and other microbes. Beutler, who is head of genetics at the Scripps Research Institute in California, and Hoffmann, director of research at the French national centre for scientific research (CNRS), discovered one of the body’s first lines of defence, where the immune system senses and destroys bacteria, fungi and viruses, and initiates inflammation to block their attacks. Steinman’s work in 1973 shed light on the immune system’s second line of defence, where sentinel “dendritic” cells direct the body’s killer T cells to attack foreign organisms. For many years, his work was dismissed as flawed by the wider scientific community. Before news of Steinman’s death emerged, Lars Klareskog, who chairs the prize-giving Nobel Assembly, said of the trio’s work: “I think that we will have new, better vaccines against microbes and that is very much needed now with the increased resistance against antibiotics.” Their discoveries are expected to lead to other treatments that combat cancer and “autoimmune” diseases, where the immune system becomes faulty and attacks healthy tissues in the body. One hope is for vaccines that marshall the immune system to fight tumours. The first such therapeutic cancer vaccine, Provenge, was approved for use in the US last year. In an interview with Bloomberg News, Beutler said: it was “incredible” to win a Nobel prize with Hoffman and Steinman: “My idea right from the beginning, I guess, was to dismantle the immune system one gene at a time so we could track the mutations that cause problems. “I woke up in the middle of the night, and glanced at my cellphone, and the first thing I saw was a message line that just said the words ‘Nobel Prize’. Needless to say, I grabbed it and started looking at the messages. Wow.” Nobel prizes Science prizes People in science Ian Sample guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …According to a study done by the Brennan Center For Justice, as many as 5 million voters will be disenfranchised by Voter ID laws passed in Republican states. These new restrictions fall most heavily on young, minority, and low-income voters, as well as on voters with disabilities. This wave of changes may sharply tilt the political terrain for the 2012 election. Based on the Brennan Center’s analysis of the 19 laws and two executive actions that passed in 14 states, it is clear that: These new laws could make it significantly harder for more than five million eligible voters to cast ballots in 2012. The states that have already cut back on voting rights will provide 171 electoral votes in 2012 – 63 percent of the 270 needed to win the presidency. Of the 12 likely battleground states, as assessed by an August Los Angeles Times analysis of Gallup polling, five have already cut back on voting rights (and may pass additional restrictive legislation), and two more are currently considering new restrictions. States have changed their laws so rapidly that no single analysis has assessed the overall impact of such moves. Although it is too early to quantify how the changes will impact voter turnout, they will be a hindrance to many voters at a time when the United States continues to turn out less than two thirds of its eligible citizens in presidential elections and less than half in midterm elections. South Carolina is one of the worst offenders already, and they are still implementing the law. Via Chron.com : Under the new law, people have to present photographic identification at precinct polling places to cast regular ballots. The data crunching is important because it will be used to reach out to voters to make sure they know about the change, an issue the U.S. Justice Department is concerned about as it reviews the law. There’s enough question about the data that the state on Friday delayed filing responses to the U.S. Justice Department’s questions about the new voter ID law, Deputy Attorney General Bryan Stirling said. “We obviously need to analyze their processes and their methods,” Stirling said. Earlier this week, the Election Commission said nearly 217,000 registered voters in the state lack a state driver’s license or photo ID. That already was nearly 40,000 more than the election agency had previously estimated. Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said data used to match state driver’s license and identification card data excluded about 117,000 inactive voters. That figure includes a mix of people who had died, moved, been convicted of crimes that suspend their voting rights or hadn’t voted since 2006. As you’ll see from the article, it’s actually even more when the DMV reports in. The video at the top is a case Al Sharpton reported on last week in South Carolina. I encourage you to watch the whole thing. What’s so insidious about these laws is how impossible they make it for the elderly, people of color, the poor and others to actually vote! No matter how much the man tried to comply, they made sure it was impossible for him to get an ID card in South Carolina, despite the fact that he was a government employee and has documents going all the way back to middle school to prove he was born in the US. Should I also remind everyone that voter fraud is a Republican crime ? Why yes, I should.
Continue reading …According to a study done by the Brennan Center For Justice, as many as 5 million voters will be disenfranchised by Voter ID laws passed in Republican states. These new restrictions fall most heavily on young, minority, and low-income voters, as well as on voters with disabilities. This wave of changes may sharply tilt the political terrain for the 2012 election. Based on the Brennan Center’s analysis of the 19 laws and two executive actions that passed in 14 states, it is clear that: These new laws could make it significantly harder for more than five million eligible voters to cast ballots in 2012. The states that have already cut back on voting rights will provide 171 electoral votes in 2012 – 63 percent of the 270 needed to win the presidency. Of the 12 likely battleground states, as assessed by an August Los Angeles Times analysis of Gallup polling, five have already cut back on voting rights (and may pass additional restrictive legislation), and two more are currently considering new restrictions. States have changed their laws so rapidly that no single analysis has assessed the overall impact of such moves. Although it is too early to quantify how the changes will impact voter turnout, they will be a hindrance to many voters at a time when the United States continues to turn out less than two thirds of its eligible citizens in presidential elections and less than half in midterm elections. South Carolina is one of the worst offenders already, and they are still implementing the law. Via Chron.com : Under the new law, people have to present photographic identification at precinct polling places to cast regular ballots. The data crunching is important because it will be used to reach out to voters to make sure they know about the change, an issue the U.S. Justice Department is concerned about as it reviews the law. There’s enough question about the data that the state on Friday delayed filing responses to the U.S. Justice Department’s questions about the new voter ID law, Deputy Attorney General Bryan Stirling said. “We obviously need to analyze their processes and their methods,” Stirling said. Earlier this week, the Election Commission said nearly 217,000 registered voters in the state lack a state driver’s license or photo ID. That already was nearly 40,000 more than the election agency had previously estimated. Election Commission spokesman Chris Whitmire said data used to match state driver’s license and identification card data excluded about 117,000 inactive voters. That figure includes a mix of people who had died, moved, been convicted of crimes that suspend their voting rights or hadn’t voted since 2006. As you’ll see from the article, it’s actually even more when the DMV reports in. The video at the top is a case Al Sharpton reported on last week in South Carolina. I encourage you to watch the whole thing. What’s so insidious about these laws is how impossible they make it for the elderly, people of color, the poor and others to actually vote! No matter how much the man tried to comply, they made sure it was impossible for him to get an ID card in South Carolina, despite the fact that he was a government employee and has documents going all the way back to middle school to prove he was born in the US. Should I also remind everyone that voter fraud is a Republican crime ? Why yes, I should.
Continue reading …Even as House Republicans plan to zero them out, National Public Radio has picked a new president with Democratic Party connections on his resume. The choice is Gary Knell, the CEO of Sesame Workshop, which makes Sesame Street “and other highly regarded children’s shows” for PBS, as NPR said. The Washington Post mentioned Knell is “a former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee when it was chaired by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.). Before his stint in Washington, he worked as a legal adviser to Gov. Jerry Brown (D-Calif.) during Brown's first term, and for Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.).” NPR has a long history of Democratic party men as presidents. Back in 1993, the MRC noted they chose a Democratic operative in Delano Lewis, a longtime associate of former Washington D.C. Mayor Marion Barry. Lewis replaced Carter official Douglas Bennet, who left to join the Clinton Administration as an Assistant Secretary of State. Bennet had taken over in 1983 for Frank Mankiewicz, who managed ultraliberal George McGovern's 1972 presidential campaign. NPR announced the choice on its newscast Morning Edition on Monday, but NPR media reporter David Folkenflik sounded like he was the network publicist . Only Knell and the people who chose him were allowed to speak, and it was praise for NPR all around, about how tremendously professional and influential it is, with 27 million listeners a week. “That’s Knell, brought to you by the letter K,” Folkenflik lamely began. Folkenflik mentioned that Knell worked for Senate Democrats, but tried to offset that by claiming that as Sesame Workshop CEO, he had worked with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on global issues. (She named him to the US Commission on UNESCO.) Knell told Folkenflik he wanted to “depoliticize” the NPR debate. “I'm not naively walking into this…I think, obviously, [NPR has] been caught somewhat in the political cross hairs in Washington. Some of that is undeserved, I think. And what I would really like to see is depoliticizing NPR a little bit, so that it's not caught in those cross hairs.” Vivian Schiller, the former NPR chief executive who is now the chief digital officer for NBC News, wrote on Twitter , “New @npr CEO Gary Knell is an experienced leader, a good man and a friend. Best shot to liberate pubradio from untenable reliance on fed $$ .” That tweet was quoted on the NPR website, but didn't make it on the morning airwaves. That's surely not the company line. Knell won the job with the usual promises that NPR would seek more money from every source: federal and state governments, corporations, foundations, listeners, and surely eccentric leftist billionaires from Hungary who want to destroy Fox News Channel. Otherwise, he said, he wants to get out of the way of its journalists, whom he called “amazingly fabulous.” “I think the point here is that it's not about liberal or conservative. It's about fairness,” Knell said. “And I think we've got to make the case that we're delivering a fair service — not only in the way we do our jobs but in the way we disseminate the news.” It's too bad that the Knell era began with a slavishly corporate story with no dissenters allowed to speak.
Continue reading …Even as House Republicans plan to zero them out, National Public Radio has picked a new president with Democratic Party connections on his resume. The choice is Gary Knell, the CEO of Sesame Workshop, which makes Sesame Street “and other highly regarded children’s shows” for PBS, as NPR said. The Washington Post mentioned Knell is “a former counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee when it was chaired by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.). Before his stint in Washington, he worked as a legal adviser to Gov. Jerry Brown (D-Calif.) during Brown's first term, and for Rep. Howard Berman (D-Calif.).” NPR has a long history of Democratic party men as presidents. Back in 1993, the MRC noted they chose a Democratic operative in Delano Lewis, a longtime associate of former Washington D.C. Mayor Marion Barry. Lewis replaced Carter official Douglas Bennet, who left to join the Clinton Administration as an Assistant Secretary of State. Bennet had taken over in 1983 for Frank Mankiewicz, who managed ultraliberal George McGovern's 1972 presidential campaign. NPR announced the choice on its newscast Morning Edition on Monday, but NPR media reporter David Folkenflik sounded like he was the network publicist . Only Knell and the people who chose him were allowed to speak, and it was praise for NPR all around, about how tremendously professional and influential it is, with 27 million listeners a week. “That’s Knell, brought to you by the letter K,” Folkenflik lamely began. Folkenflik mentioned that Knell worked for Senate Democrats, but tried to offset that by claiming that as Sesame Workshop CEO, he had worked with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice on global issues. (She named him to the US Commission on UNESCO.) Knell told Folkenflik he wanted to “depoliticize” the NPR debate. “I'm not naively walking into this…I think, obviously, [NPR has] been caught somewhat in the political cross hairs in Washington. Some of that is undeserved, I think. And what I would really like to see is depoliticizing NPR a little bit, so that it's not caught in those cross hairs.” Vivian Schiller, the former NPR chief executive who is now the chief digital officer for NBC News, wrote on Twitter , “New @npr CEO Gary Knell is an experienced leader, a good man and a friend. Best shot to liberate pubradio from untenable reliance on fed $$ .” That tweet was quoted on the NPR website, but didn't make it on the morning airwaves. That's surely not the company line. Knell won the job with the usual promises that NPR would seek more money from every source: federal and state governments, corporations, foundations, listeners, and surely eccentric leftist billionaires from Hungary who want to destroy Fox News Channel. Otherwise, he said, he wants to get out of the way of its journalists, whom he called “amazingly fabulous.” “I think the point here is that it's not about liberal or conservative. It's about fairness,” Knell said. “And I think we've got to make the case that we're delivering a fair service — not only in the way we do our jobs but in the way we disseminate the news.” It's too bad that the Knell era began with a slavishly corporate story with no dissenters allowed to speak.
Continue reading …Alaa’ Nassif Jassim al-Bazzouni wins case against guidance issued by UK government An Iraqi citizen has won a legal victory in London over the “barbaric” practice of hooding terror suspects. Alaa’ Nassif Jassim al-Bazzouni argued that government guidance unlawfully condoned hooding prisoners for security reasons. Lawyers for the Iraqi citizen challenged the guidance on the grounds that it explicitly and unlawfully condones the “barbaric practice” of hooding prisoners for “transit and security purposes”. Bazzouni – a father of three who lives in Basra – says he was abused and hooded by British troops in 2006, in the wake of the war to overthrow Saddam Hussein. Bazzouni challenged new guidance issued by the UK government on the interrogation of suspects held by foreign states. The high court heard that British troops or intelligence officers are now banned from hooding prisoners themselves. The guidance still allows them to co-operate with countries that might continue to hood for “security reasons”. On Monday, two judges ruled the guidance should be changed so that hooding was not permitted at all because of the risk it posed to physical and mental health. Phil Shiner, the solicitor representing Bazzouni, said: “This judgment represents the final nail in the coffin of the Ministry of Defence’s desperate and morally corrupt efforts to keep hooding alive as a permissible interrogation technique. “Sir William Gage’s first recommendation in the Baha Mousa inquiry report is that there must be an absolute prohibition on hooding. The MoD’s position has been that it is still legally permissible for security reasons. “This judgment slams the door shut for ever on hooding involving UK personnel anywhere in the world.” Military Iraq Middle East Human rights Torture guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …