Home » Archives by category » News » Politics (Page 111)
Microsoft adds new features to Hotmail, releases an Android app

When we heard Microsoft was holding a press event called “Give Hotmail a Second Look,” we wondered if a full-on redesign was in store. The answer happens to be a resounding “no,” but the software giant is rolling out a raft of new features to its 365 million-some-odd users. This includes an Android app with two-way email, contact and calendar syncing (!), along with a slew of updates to Hotmail’s web interface. First up, you can now automatically categorize incoming mail as newsletters, and then either trash ‘em or sweep them to a folder. Additionally, an “Unsubscribe” feature lets you do just that, with Hotmail handling the dirty work of blocking future newsletters from that sender, as well as asking the company to kindly stop spamming you. Moving along, flagged messages will now sit at the top of the inbox so that they don’t get lost in the morass of incoming mail. If you’re so inclined, you can program Hotmail to automatically flag messages with a particular subject line, from a certain sender, et cetera. Meanwhile, “Scheduled Cleanup” automatically deletes messages after a certain number of days have passed — a good way to cut through that pile of unused Groupon alerts. Other updates include the ability to manage and edit folders and apply categories to individual emails — all inline. And, last but not least, you’ll now see so-called Instant Actions (e.g., “delete,” “flag”) when you hover over messages. We’ve got a few screenshots below, and you can also hit the source link for some extra details, straight from the horse’s mouth. Gallery: Microsoft’s “Give Hotmail a Second Look” announcement Microsoft adds new features to Hotmail, releases an Android app originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 17:00:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Russian oligarchs’ feud rolls into London court

Exiled Boris Berezovsky sues former friend Roman Abramovich over business deal gone sour It was the clash of the oligarchs. On one side of the courtroom was Boris Berezovsky, Kremlin critic, political exile, and sworn enemy of Vladimir Putin. On the other, Roman Abramovich, the billionaire owner of Chelsea football club, and a man known for his fondness for yachts. In the middle a lot of bodyguards wearing very dark shades. Once close friends, and alleged beneficiaries of Russia’s controversial privatisation programme, the two men have been locked in an ugly public feud for more than a decade and have steadfastly avoided each other. But on Monday they came face to face at the high court in London in a case that could set a multibillion-pound record for private litigation in the UK. The court heard that Abramovich “blackmailed and betrayed” Berezovsky, his former mentor, and put “wealth and influence” above “loyalty and friendship”. Berezovsky claims Abramovich “intimidated” him into selling his shares in the Russian oil company Sibneft at a fraction of their true value. Berezovsky is claiming in excess of $5bn (£3.2bn) in damages from Abramovich over the Sibneft deal, his barrister Laurence Rabinowitz QC said. Berezovsky, who fled Russia in 2000 after falling out with Putin, who was then president, also wants at least $564m in compensation for another deal involving the Russian aluminium company Rusal. The case was being heard in the gleaming new Rolls building of the commercial court in Fetter Lane, before Mrs Justice Gloster. Both Russians sat at opposite ends of the packed courtroom number 26, with Abramovich listening to the proceedings in Russian via headphones. They ignored each other. Their entourages included supporters in shiny suits, Russian assistants dressed in black, relatives, friends, and so many lawyers that some were forced to sit at the back of the court. Scheduled to last 12 weeks, the case has attracted some of the bar’s biggest names, including Jonathan Sumption QC, acting for Abramovich. Berezovsky is likely to give evidence on Thursday. Abramovich will take the stand, speaking in Russian, in early November. The case promises to shed light on Russia’s murky privatisation programme in the 1990s, during which a small group of well-connected businessmen – subsequently dubbed oligarchs – became fantastically rich. It is also likely to illuminate the opaque connection between money, politics and power in Russia, both in the court of former president Boris Yeltsin, and in the more sinister era of Putin, the current prime minister who now looks set to return to the Kremlin next year. Rabinowitz told the judge that both men had worked together to create Sibneft in 1995 and they had become good friends. The partnership had also included the businessman Arkady “Badri” Patarkatsishvili, Georgia’s wealthiest man. “This is a case about two men who, and this is common ground, worked together to acquire an asset – that is Sibneft – that would make them wealthy beyond the wildest dreams of most people,” Rabinowitz said. The relationship continued until Putin, whom Berezovsky helped propel into the Kremlin, became Russia’s leader. In the process they became and remained good friends, said Rabinowitz, until “Berezovsky, who had adopted a high political profile in Russia, not least through his control of certain media outlets, fell out with those in the Kremlin and was forced to leave his home and create a new life abroad.” The barrister said Abramovich was left with the choice of remaining loyal to his old friend or seeking to “profit from his difficulties”. He said that Abramovich picked the latter route, and told Berezovsky that he had to sell his interests in Sibneft at a knockdown price. If he refused, people in the Kremlin led by Putin would expropriate them, Abramovich allegedly warned. “Mr Putin had come to regard Mr Berezovsky as an enemy,” Rabinowitz said. Abramovich denies that Berezovsky or Patarkatsishvili were ever his business partners. He insists that he was the sole owner of Sibneft, plus had a sole share of Rusal, subsequently sold on to another Russian tycoon, Oleg Deripaska. He says he merely “hired” Berezovsky, a key figure in Yeltsin’s entourage, to provide political cover – known by the Russian word krysha (roof) – essential to any businessman wishing to survive in the lawless 1990s. Berezovsky provided services “basically criminal in nature”, Abramovich’s lawyers allege. These included “corrupt political patronage” and protection from “Chechen criminal gangs”. Berezovsky’s barrister conceded that the case was “incredibly complex”. He said that many of the crucial agreements had been made verbally – the preferred method, he said, for blackmailers. Another layer of difficulty stems from the fact that several of the protagonists are dead. Patarkatishvili died of a heart attack in 2008, prompting a bitter continuing legal battle between his relatives and Berezovsky. The British lawyer Stephen Smith, meanwhile, who took notes of a crucial business meeting in the Georgian capital Tbilisi, died in a mysterious helicopter crash in 2004. There was enough material, however, to illustrate that Abramovich had “whitewashed” Berezovsky from the picture, the barrister said. He added: “The case is rather lacking in contemporanous documents. But some documents stand out like a beacon.” Russia Europe Boris Berezovsky Roman Abramovich Luke Harding guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
George Osborne promises credit lifeline for UK firms

Chancellor to announce novel ‘credit easing’ plan to help struggling businesses and avoid the risk of a second credit crunch Growing fears that the euro crisis will prompt a second British banking seizure have led George Osborne to announce unprecedented plans for the Treasury to supply a multibillion credit line direct to British firms, starting with small and medium-sized businesses. Under the novel “credit easing” plan, the Treasury will buy company bonds in an attempt to cut the cost of credit for struggling firms and boost the supply of credit. A Treasury official said: “An aim is to avoid a second credit crunch because of the risks of sorting out the euro crisis affecting the operations of the bond market.” The Treasury is aware of the extent to which the UK banks are exposed if the euro crisis deepens. The chancellor, due to attend a meeting of European finance ministers on Tuesday, has warned of the dangers should the crisis not be resolved during the G20 summit in Cannes, which ends on 4 November. In Osborne’s sometimes grim speech to the Conservative party conference in Manchester, he admitted that difficult days lay ahead but insisted Britain could weather the storm if it stuck to its deficit plan. Borrowing too much was the cause of Britain’s problems – not the solution – he said, rejecting rightwing calls for tax cuts and social democrat pleas for a Keynesian demand boost. Osborne also used his speech to say Britain was abandoning its leadership role on climate change in Europe. Britain will press ahead with plans to cut carbon emissions by 30% by 2020 only if the rest of the EU adopted the targets, he said. He also upset the unions by announcing plans to charge fees of £150-250 for every employment tribunal application, and a further £1,000 if the case reaches the tribunal. The credit easing plan, due to be fleshed out in the budget in November, stops short of a state investment bank but is an implicit admission that commercial banks are unwilling or incapable of supplying credit to British business. Desperate to find new weapons to combat a second credit crunch, Osborne felt forced to propose that the Treasury intervene directly partly because the governor of the Bank of England, Sir Mervyn King, has refused to take the step, insisting the Bank cannot take on the risk. “Because banks are damaged they won’t lend at current rates,” Osborne said. “Everyone knows Britain’s small firms are struggling to get credit and banks are weak. So as part of my determination to get the economy moving I have set the Treasury to work on ways to inject money directly into parts of the economy that need it, such as small businesses.” Under the plan, already attempted successfully in the US, Treasury officials said the Bank is nevertheless likely to act as the agent buying the corporate bonds for the Treasury, but the money will appear on the Treasury balance sheet as a contingent liability similar to the way in which the credit guarantee scheme was set up in the 2008 crisis. Treasury officials said the cost of buying the corporate bonds would not add to the deficit because the government will be obtaining assets in return for its investment. Since the Treasury would be funding, but not directly administering, the scheme ministers would not be directly involved in “picking winners”, the Treasury said. Osborne’s aides denied the proposal could be billed as plan B, but questions remain how the Treasury recovers loans if firms are unable to repay. Opposition politicians said the move represents an admission that the Project Merlin deal between government and banks designed to increase lending to business had failed. Under Merlin the banks said they would increase lending to SMEs (small and medium sized enterprises) to £76bn this year, which equates to £19bn in the first quarter. Ruling out a fiscal stimulus, Osborne argued the world was facing a “debt crisis” that means fiscal expansion carries more risks than potential benefits. “Borrowing too much is the cause of Britain’s problems, not the solution,” he said, adding the bond markets were “ready to pick off the next country that lacks the will to deal with its debts”. Deviation from his programme would “be abandoning the deficit plan that has brought us the stability other nations today crave”. Lord Oakeshott, the Lib Dem peer who resigned as a party Treasury spokesman in February over the Merlin deal, said this was proof the pact with the banking industry had failed. “George Osborne is right to say Britain’s small firms are still struggling to get credit and banks are weak. Everyone knows that, so why won’t the Treasury accept that Project Merlin has failed and we must impose tough new net small business lending targets on the banks. “We taxpayers control RBS and Lloyds with 60% of the SME market – so we must act directly, starting with them, to end the loan famine and let small businesses grow. The top priority is to pull the levers sitting under our noses now to make the banks lend.” Bankers pointed out that government already had a means to buy corporate debt. Labour set up an Asset Purchase Facility in January 2009 that was able to buy commercial paper and corporate bonds but it has not been very active. Recent data from the Bank of England shows it bought less than £100m of commercial paper and £1.3bn of corporate bonds. This compares with almost £200bn of government bonds. In a sign of jitters Xavier Rolet, chief executive of the London Stock Exchange, predicted at a Financial Times fringe meeting at conference that Greece would default within four to six weeks whilst Henry Bellingham, a Foreign Office minister, said it would be within six months. Economic policy Conservative conference 2011 George Osborne Banking Bonds Euro European Union Patrick Wintour Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Jonathan Coulton talks coding, Creative Commons and becoming an internet rockstar (video)

There are few ways of endearing yourself to the geek world more quickly than writing a song like “Code Monkey.” The developer-friendly track was one of 52 released as part of Jonathan Coulton’s year-long “Thing a Week” project and was later adopted as the theme song for a similarly-titled G4 program. The songwriter was just adhering to that old adage of “writing what you know,” having worked as a full-time computer programmer prior to giving the music world a go — though, as he readily admits, he still keeps it real by coding for his own site. We sat down with Coulton as part of this month’s Engadget Show , discussing his midlife crisis-driven decision to quit his day job and the journey that the internet played in making him a star. We also discussed the musician’s favorite tech, his love of Creative Commons and using gadgets to make music. Coulton also treated us to three songs, including “Still Alive” from the Portal soundtrack and two tracks off his brand new record Artificial Heart . Video of all that after the break. Continue reading Jonathan Coulton talks coding, Creative Commons and becoming an internet rockstar (video) Jonathan Coulton talks coding, Creative Commons and becoming an internet rockstar (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:41:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Join the Engadget HD Podcast live on Ustream at 4:30PM

It’s Monday, and we’re still here to help by letting you peek into the recording booth when the Engadget HD podcast goes to mp3 at 4:30PM . We’re a little early this week, so take a peek at the live stream, chat and list of topics after the break. Continue reading Join the Engadget HD Podcast live on Ustream at 4:30PM Join the Engadget HD Podcast live on Ustream at 4:30PM originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 15:52:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on

It’s true of other portable electronics and it applies here, too: if you own an e-reader, there’s a strong argument to be made that you need a case. Sure, readers are a little more scratch-resistant than smartphones, but a little bit of backpack trauma can do some nasty things to an e-ink display. That could be Amazon’s elevator pitch, anyway. Introduced at the company’s launch event last week , the Kindle Lighted Leather Cover comes in various sizes, with versions for the Kindle Touch and fourth generation Kindle . We spent some hands-on time with the latter over the weekend and have to say: we’re liking what we’re seeing so far. Read on to find out why. Gallery: Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on Continue reading Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:24:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on

It’s true of other portable electronics and it applies here, too: if you own an e-reader, there’s a strong argument to be made that you need a case. Sure, readers are a little more scratch-resistant than smartphones, but a little bit of backpack trauma can do some nasty things to an e-ink display. That could be Amazon’s elevator pitch, anyway. Introduced at the company’s launch event last week , the Kindle Lighted Leather Cover comes in various sizes, with versions for the Kindle Touch and fourth generation Kindle . We spent some hands-on time with the latter over the weekend and have to say: we’re liking what we’re seeing so far. Read on to find out why. Gallery: Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on Continue reading Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on Amazon Kindle Lighted Leather Cover hands-on originally appeared on Engadget on Mon, 03 Oct 2011 16:24:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds . Permalink

Continue reading …
Scrap NHS reforms, doctors tell Lords

Experts including 40 directors of public health say government’s health and social care bill will cause ‘irreparable harm’ More than 260 senior doctors and public health experts are calling on the House of Lords to throw out the government’s health and social care bill, saying it will do “irreparable harm to the NHS, to individual patients and to society as a whole”. The signatories include Professor Sir Michael Marmot, the author of several reports on the links between wealth and health that suggest children born into poverty are penalised for life. Marmot has until now not been openly critical of the coalition’s approach, and instead has offered encouragement for David Cameron and Andrew Lansley’s apparent enthusiasm for public health. But Marmot and others in senior positions have now concluded the bill will damage all aspects of the health service. “While we welcome the emphasis placed on establishing a closer working relationship between public health and local government, the proposed reforms as a whole will disrupt, fragment and weaken the country’s public health capabilities,” says the letter. “The government claims that the reforms have the backing of the health professions. They do not. Neither do they have the general support of the public.” The letter details the harms the experts believe the health reform bill will do. “It ushers in a significantly heightened degree of commercialisation and marketisation that will lead to the harmful fragmentation of patient care; aggravate risks to individual patient safety; erode medical ethics and trust within the healthcare system; widen health inequalities; waste much money on attempts to regulate and manage competition; and undermine the ability of the health system to respond effectively and efficiently to communicate disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies,” the letter says. In their judgment, the signatories say, the bill “will erode the NHS’s ethical and co-operative foundations” and “will not deliver efficiency, quality, fairness or choice”. The signatories include around 40 directors of public health from around the country who have taken the difficult decision to go public with their concerns. There are also two senior members of the Faculty of Public Health, one of whom, Dr John Middleton, is a vice-president. Other well-known names include Professor John Ashton, director of public health in Cumbria, and Professor Michel Coleman from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Dr David McCoy, consultant in public health medicine at the Inner North West London primary care trust, one of the organisers of the letter, said he was surprised at the number of people prepared to sign. “I think if we had continued to collect signatures, I’m quite sure we would have collected another 200 It is having a snowball effect,” he said. “I think the feeling is incredibly strong.” There was a lot of debate about whether we should call for outright rejection or amendments, but there is a feeling the whole package of reforms is harmful and we need to express our position in the strongest terms. I think there was a feeling the forthcoming reading in the House of Lords is the last chance of minimising the harm and damage.” The public health community has not spoken out in this way before. “I think there has been an attempt to work with the reforms and work behind the scenes to optimise the proposed reforms,” said Dr McCoy. Dr Middleton said there was no great opposition to the planned move to place public health services such as smoking cessation within local authorities. “But the letter is a recognition from the public health community that the reforms proposed around the NHS are deeply damaging to the public health in themselves,” he said. There was concern that they would lead to inequalities in healthcare and less access for the poorest and most deprived to the services they need. “The experience of other countries that have ‘liberated’ their health systems has resulted in very poor health services for their communities. I’m thinking of Russia and China where a free market in health resulted in major falls in life expectancy and systems that had provided some safety net cover have failed,” he said. Commenting on the letter, published in the Daily Telegraph on the eve of health secretary Andrew Lansley’s address to the Tory party conference, shadow health secretary John Healey said: “David Cameron is in denial, both about the damage his plans are doing to the NHS and the strength of opposition to his health bill. “There is no mandate for the bill, either from the election or the coalition agreement. With the government having railroaded its plans through the Commons, heavy responsibility is now going to be shouldered by the Lords.” NHS Health policy Health Doctors Public services policy House of Lords Sarah Boseley guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
It’s Not Republican Obstruction, It’s Leadership! Peggy Noonan Sez Obama Needs To Reach Out More

Click here to view this media The Beltway Bubble is like walking through Alice’s Looking Glass: Though curiously familiar, no one acts as one would expect and what is unquestionably real on the other side is inverted from the inside. Inside the Beltway, there is no such thing as rabid partisan obstruction on the part of Republicans. Inside the Beltway, the magical ponies line up, waiting to be dispersed by the Unitary Executive Obama, without the interference of the Congress. Peggy Noonan is the ultimate insider. She, of the pursed lips and meaningful sidelong glances, wants you to know that it’s not the Republican pledge to make Obama a one-term president at all costs that’s at issue….it’s Obama’s leadership . NOONAN: A leader leads. A leader leads. Part of the president’s problem is that he has never, from day one, been able to really pull in bipartisan support. Either make Republicans afraid of him, or want to follow him. He’s never been able to do it. Part of the reason people are talking about Chris Christie is that he’s in a Democratic state–he’s a Republican governor—but he has made progress on deficits, spending, pensions, property taxes, with a Democratic legislature. It’s never an excuse that washes, to say, oh, the other team, the other party are bad guys, they wouldn’t follow me. If you’re a leader, you make them… Right….all the blame lies entirely with Obama. Nothing else washes. The Republicans would be completely willing to support the president if only he was different . He hasn’t reached out to them at all. He hasn’t incorporated Republican ideas and demands into everything he’s tried to pass. He hasn’t bent over backward to reach out to Republicans over and over and over. And I hate to break this to Nooners, but for as much as the eocnomy does suck, the Obama administration *has* made progress economically as well. And for cryin’ out loud, citing Chris Christie’s ability to pass legislation with a Democratic congress in New Jersey both misses and makes the point. Elected Democrats don’t put party over country (or state). Democrats will negotiate and work with the opposing party. Republicans won’t. Full stop. But that isn’t how it works through the looking glass, does it, Peggy?

Continue reading …
Is Iceland the best country for women?

An openly lesbian PM, affordable childcare and a formidable women’s movement – Iceland may just be a feminist paradise On a wet day in Reykjavik, the rain battering the fishing boats, the tourist shops and the young male artists with their improbable moustaches, Iceland’s minister of industry, energy and tourism is explaining to me that the country needs to be “more badass” about the gender pay gap. The minister is Katrin Juliusdottir , a warm, attractive woman in her mid-30s, pregnant with twins. As she speaks, a hint of frustration enters her voice. Icelandic legislation supposedly guarantees equal pay for equal work, as in the UK ,

Continue reading …