Ratings agency Moody’s slashes Italy debt rating by three points, increasing pressure on European governments trying to contain financial crisis • Bernanke says US economy is ‘close to faltering’ Italy’s sovereign debt rating has been cut for the second time in as many weeks, with ratings agency Moody’s citing “sustained and non-cyclical erosion of confidence” as it slashed its forecast for the country. In a report released after US stock markets closed on Tuesday, Moody’s downgraded Italy’s government bond ratings from Aa2 to A2 with a “negative outlook”, suggesting further cuts could be to come. The move threatens to increase Italy’s cost of borrowing, and will add yet more pressure to European finance ministers now wrestling with a financial crisis that has spread across the continent. Italy’s prime minsiter Silvio Berlusconi criticised Moody’s rival Standard & Poor’s when it cut Italy’s credit rating last month, saying the ratings agency’s action was “dictated more by newspaper stories than by reality”. In its report, Moody’s said the decision had been driven by three main factors: the debt crisis, which was causing a “sustained and non-cyclical erosion of confidence” in Europe and increasing “long-term funding risks” for Italy; the increased downside risks to economic growth due to macroeconomic structural weaknesses; and a weakening global outlook. “The implementation risks and time needed to achieve the government’s fiscal consolidation targets to reverse the adverse trend observed in the public debt, due to economic and political uncertainties,” Moody’s said. The Italian government said in a statement that the decision was expected, and reiterated its pledge to balance its budget. Italy last month approved a €54bn package of austerity measures aimed at eliminating the country’s budget woes and that it hoped would stave off a Moody’s downgrade. The pledge to cut government spending and raise taxes met with cautious approval from Brussels, the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund but has not appeased Moody’s. “Even if policy actions were to succeed in the short term in returning some degree of normality to euro area sovereign debt markets, the underlying fragility and loss of confidence is deep and likely to be sustained,” Moody’s said in its report. “The Italian economy continues to face significant challenges due to structural economic weaknesses. These problems — mainly low productivity and important labour and product market rigidities — have been an impediment to the achievement of higher potential growth rates over the past decade and continue to hinder the economy’s recovery from the severe recession it experienced in 2009,” said Moody’s. “These structural impediments to economic growth cannot be removed quickly. The government’s reform plans have only just started to address some of these structural challenges, and they need to be implemented efficiently. Moreover, moderate medium-term growth prospects for the Italian economy have been further revised downwards due to potential adverse effects of a weakening European and global growth outlook.” Italy’s latest downgrade follows cuts for eurozone partners Spain, Ireland, Greece, Portugal and Cyprus. The news came after reports that European finance ministers were forging ahead with plans to support Europe’s weakening finance sector, news that had cheered US markets before they closed. European debt crisis Ratings agencies Italy Global economy Financial crisis European Union Dominic Rushe guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Eva Gabrielsson and bestselling writer Stieg Larsson had always wanted to marry. But his sudden death didn’t just deprive her of her wedding day, it also plunged her into a nightmare of legal wrangling It was in 1983 that Eva Gabrielsson and Stieg Larsson first decided to get married. They had been together for a decade, after meeting at an anti-Vietnam war group when they were both 18. He had immediately caught her eye “because he was so different from the others in the anti-war movement”, she says, sitting in a bar in Soho in central London, a quiet, precise Swedish woman in her late 50s. “Some of them could be quite arrogant, obnoxious and self-righteous, but he was there because he thought the war was wrong, that this was a
Continue reading …Eva Gabrielsson and bestselling writer Stieg Larsson had always wanted to marry. But his sudden death didn’t just deprive her of her wedding day, it also plunged her into a nightmare of legal wrangling It was in 1983 that Eva Gabrielsson and Stieg Larsson first decided to get married. They had been together for a decade, after meeting at an anti-Vietnam war group when they were both 18. He had immediately caught her eye “because he was so different from the others in the anti-war movement”, she says, sitting in a bar in Soho in central London, a quiet, precise Swedish woman in her late 50s. “Some of them could be quite arrogant, obnoxious and self-righteous, but he was there because he thought the war was wrong, that this was a
Continue reading …On the eve of another Greek general strike, bank share prices were sent tumbling across Europe Pressure to inject fresh capital into Europe’s weakest banks mounted today as the chancellor, George Osborne, and officials in Brussels united in efforts to prevent contagion from the deepening Greek sovereign debt crisis. Amid fears that €3.4bn (£2.9bn) of exposure to Greek debt would bring down Franco-Belgian bank Dexia, tensions were rising across the banking sector and pressure mounted on the European Central Bank to be more generous in loans to banks to prevent a rerun of the 2007 credit crunch. The gloom that has lingered over the banking industry since August deepened further as Germany’s biggest bank, Deutsche Bank, warned it would miss its profits target and the cost of insuring major US banks against default reached levels last hit in October 2008. The share prices of many banks were tumbling as the chancellor and Anders Borg, the Swedish finance minister, urged colleagues to prop up banks with public funds, despite fierce resistance from the French who insist Europe is not at risk. Senior officials led by Olli Rehn, EU economic and monetary affairs commissioner, backed their stance, which has also been promoted by Christine Lagarde, managing director of the International Monetary Fund. She has said that up to €300bn in capital may be required. Senior figures are pressing for stress tests for Europe’s banks to be brought forward from next year after Dexia passed the July tests with flying colours. Several officials referred to Dexia as “the canary in the coalmine”. Osborne said eurozone banks need to be strengthened. “We need to reflect the reality of the situation in the euro area and account for the reality of the sovereign risk the market can see out there and that requires more capital in some eurozone banks.” Fresh capital would preferably be raised privately but a public backstop might be necessary. Borg, also a non-zone minister, was blunter. “Government support is the best kind of backstop,” he said. Rehn said: “We need to get more firepower against contagion effects and support recapitalisation of the banks.” The head of the European regulator, the European Banking Authority, Andrea Enria, also called for action to fix the eurozone crisis. “It’s a major issue that could go from Dexia to other banks, so it’s important this is fixed and the sooner it’s done the better,” said Enria, who oversaw the July stress tests on banks. Bob Diamond, the Barclays boss, speaking at a London conference, also called on European leaders to be decisive. “Confidence will not be restored until the EU sovereign debt issue is resolved. This is the most critical issue weighing on the markets right now,” Diamond said. He called for greater fiscal union in Europe. Investors are also urging leaders to restore confidence in the banking sector. Robert Talbut, chief investment officer at Royal London Asset Management, said: “The stress tests have once again been shown to have come up short in terms of what investors were looking for. Banks need a forced recapitalisation. It is exactly the right thing to do to rebuild confidence.” He said that ideally banks should be split into “bad” and “good” banks and that a eurozone shock would threaten UK banks as well. “If Europe falls over, at least two of the UK’s banks and possibly three will need recapitalisation.” The rare spot of upbeat news came from UBS, the Swiss bank hit by the alleged $2.3bn rogue trading scandal, which said it now expected to make a “modest” profit in the third quarter, having said previously warned of a loss. Analysts noted that the reason for the change was the falling price of UBS debt, which, under an accounting quirk, helps to bolster its profits. At the London conference, UBS finance director Tom Naratil stressed clients had deserted the bank as had been feared and that he expected an improvement in the bank’s performance. At the same conference Stephen Hester, chief executive of RBS, put up a slide saying “return target under review in light of challenges” – referring to the gloomy economic backdrop and the effect of proposals banks should “ringfence” high street form investment banking. RBS shares fell 4% to 21.5p. Lloyds Banking Group, the other bailed out UK bank, also tumbled as its chief executive António Horta-Osório also painted a gloomy picture. It fell 5% to 32p. Deutsche Bank warned of 500 job cuts and admitted it would not reach its target for €10bn of profit this year. It was forced to take a €250m writedown. Its shares fell 4%. Pressure is also being felt on banks in the US. Gavan Nolan, director credit research at Markit, noted that the cost of insuring Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs hit levels last experienced during the October 2008 crisis. It now costs $650,000 a year to insure $10m of Morgan Stanley debt and $445,000 to insure debt issued by Goldman Sachs. Top bankers are hoping the ECB will decide on Thursday to extend credit to eurozone banks from three months to a year, or even two, in an effort to calm tensions. Evangelos Venizelos, the Greek finance minister, insisted that last night’s marathon seven-hour eurogroup meeting had been held in a “very friendly climate towards Greece.” The decision to withhold €8bn in aid was a purely procedural matter, he said, taken to give all 17 euro area members the time to ratify the newly expanded European financial stability facility so as not to send the wrong signal to markets. But Greeks are in shock over the EU’s refusal to release fresh rescue funds. In private officials now say the government has enough money to tide it over until November when only weeks ago they were saying it would run out of cash by 15 October. “When you’re negotiating you say such things to speed up the process,” one insider said after the press conference. “The issue is not the sixth tranche of aid but the seventh, eighth and ninth instalments … ministers in Europe are very concerned about contagion. Default cannot be ruled out and that’s what Greeks don’t seem to realise. “If we default, it’s not just the domino effect. It will make Argentina look like small game. This place will become worse off than Bangladesh. People will be killed for a sandwich as they cross the road. It will be that bad.” Venizelos is first to admit the downward spiral of the Greek economy will continue for some time. It is forecast to contract by 5.5% this year. “By the end of 2012 the economy will have shrunk by 15% [over four years] … what is important is that we go on to enforce corrective measures, not just fiscal consolidation measures.” Neither Venizelos nor any of his aides have been able to enter their own offices in recent days, such is the fury of protesting civil servants who have taken over an array of ministries including the finance ministry. “They’d beat me up if I tried to go in,” one official said. With the country braced for a 24-hour general strike Wednesday everyone is waiting with bated breath to see if mass rallies turn violent when unions take to the streets. European debt crisis European banks Banking Greece France Belgium European Central Bank George Osborne Germany European Union Bob Diamond UBS Deutsche Bank David Gow Helena Smith Jill Treanor guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Click here to view this media I guess we already knew that Russell Pearce — author of SB1070 and our favorite Nazi-coddling nativist politician — has nothing but contempt for Latino voters. Now he’s demonstrating the same contempt for every voter in his Arizona legislative district. Pearce, of course, is facing a recall election because voters in his district finally got tired of his anti-immigrant extremism — not to mention his coarse, embarrassing corruption . So how does Pearce go about convincing voters that now he’s a trustworthy public servant? Why, by indulging in a scam that colorfully demonstrates both his base bigotry and his utter lack of ethics, of course. It seems that Pearce’s operatives — notably, a local tea-party leader — went out and recruited a hapless conservative Latino lady named Olivia Cortes to run a sham candidacy in the upcoming recall election — the idea being that if enough Latinos vote for Cortes it will drain support away from his actual opponent, Jerry Lewis. Phoenix’s ABC 15 has more, including a revealing interview with Cortes herself, who demonstrates clearly on camera that she’s utterly clueless, a front for the tea partiers who support Pearce ardently: For the first time, could there be evidence Cortes is a sham candidate? It was presented in Maricopa County Superior Court during Thursday’s hearing. An audio recording could help in the case to block the senate candidacy of Cortes. In the recording, you hear Suzanne Dreher’s voice. She says she was paid to circulate petitions to get Olivia Cortes’ name on the ballot. A voter can be heard in the recording saying, “Oh, well, I don’t think I want to sign because I support Russell Pearce.” Dreher can reportedly be heard saying, “Well, then you want to sign.” Under oath, she testified to a hidden agenda to get Sen. Russell Pearce re-elected. “I was told if people were supporters of Pearce to go ahead and sign this and it would help his chances,” Dreher said in court. “So the idea was to dilute or divert the vote?” asked Tom Ryan, the plaintiff’s attorney. Dreher responded, “Yeah.” Ryan asked Dreher, “Did anyone talk to you prior to you doing this advise you that by running a diversionary or sham candidate that might run afoul of Arizona election laws? Dreher responded, “I had no idea.” Here’s Cortes’ full interview with ABC 15. As you can see, she’s being coached off-camera by the tea-partying Pearce operative — a guy named Greg Western — who created this fraud: Click here to view this media On Monday, the court ruled that Cortes can keep running, but it castigated Greg Western for playing games with the election: In his ruling, Burke did skewer East Valley Tea Party chairman Greg Western, a Pearce supporter who has been helping Cortes with her campaign. “His testimony that he has no idea who designed, posted, and paid for campaign signs supporting Cortes or who paid the professional circulators is too improbable to be believed,” he said. “The court finds that Pearce supporters recruited Cortes, a political neophyte, to run in the recall election to siphon Hispanic votes from Lewis to advance Pearce’s recall election bid.” Burke said without the support of Pearce supporters, Cortes would have had no chance of qualifying as a candidate or running any sort of political campaign, but reiterated that the court found no wrongdoing by Cortes herself. He said the courts should not, in most cases, be the final arbiter of the motives political candidates have for running for election. “Divining candidates’ motives and acting on them is more properly the role of the voters,” Burke said. “Plaintiff’s remedy is through the ballot box and not the courts.” He said the fact that many petition gatherers honestly told signers that signing Cortes’ petition would help Pearce makes it additionally difficult for him to find fraud. Meanwhile, an investigation has been launched into the question of who is paying for Cortes’ campaign, including the signs that are popping up all over Mesa. Amusingly enough, Pearce — who adamantly denies having anything to do with Cortes candidacy — tried playing the race card when he was called out on this: PEARCE: Where’s Gloria Allred when you need her? You know, this Hispanic woman doesn’t have a right to run? Is this a white male Mormon race only? Shame on them. Shame on them. Obviously, Pearce and his operatives think we’re all stupid. Or at least, that the voters of Mesa are.
Continue reading …At least one dead after a Bell 206 helicopter crashed into the river after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank At least one passenger has died after a helicopter which was believed to be carrying a group of British tourists crashed into New York’s East River after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank. Three of the tourists and the pilot were taken to hospital after they were pulled out of the river, according to the authorities, who said that two of the injured, both women, were in a critical condition. Police and fire department divers pulled victims of the crash out of the Bell 407 after it was submerged in murky waters near 34th Street in midtown Manhattan. Detective Martin Speechley of the New York Police Department told Sky News that the recovery operation would have “been done by touch” because that part of the river was so murky. Dan Sweeney, manager at the nearby Water Club restaurant, told the NBC New York news outlet that the helicopter appeared to be in the process of landing when it crashed. “It went down pretty fast, you could see the splash, you could see the top of it and it just disappeared,” he said. “It looked like it was trying to land at the heliport and missed the landing.” Joy Garnett and her husband were on the dock waiting to take the East River ferry to Brooklyn when they heard the blades of a helicopter and saw it start to take off from the nearby helipad. She told the Associated Press that she saw it do “a funny curlicue.” “I thought, ‘Is that some daredevil move?’” she said. “But it was obviously out of control. The body spun around at least two or three times, and then it went down.” She said the chopper had lifted about 25 feet (7.6 meters) off the ground before it dropped into the water without much of a splash. It flipped over, and the blades were sticking up out of the river. She said people on the dock started throwing in life jackets and buoys. Two people came up out of the waves. “It didn’t make much noise,” she said. “It was just a splash and sunk.” The weather was clear but a little windy at the time of the incident, with winds gusting up to 20 mph (32 kph) and visibility of 10 miles (16 kilometers), according to the weather station at LaGuardia airport. There were a few clouds at 3,500 feet (1,066 meters) above sea level, well above the typical flying altitude for helicopters. Carlos Acevedo, of Puerto Rico, was with his wife at a nearby park area when they saw the helicopter go down. “It sank fast,” he said. “In seconds. Like the water was sucking it in.” Lau Kamg was leaving a dentist’s office and was walking nearby when he saw the chopper go down, and he said it appeared to be in distress. “The sound got my attention,” he said. I saw it splash.” In August 2009, a small plane collided with a helicopter over the Hudson River, on the other side of Manhattan, killing nine people, including five Italian tourists. A government safety panel found that an air traffic controller who was on a personal phone call had contributed to the accident. The Federal Aviation Administration changed its rules for aircraft flying over New York City’s rivers after that collision. Pilots must call out their positions on the radio and obey a 161 mph speed limit. Before the changes, such radio calls were optional. Earlier that year, an Airbus 320 airliner landed in the Hudson after hitting birds and losing both engines shortly after taking off from LaGuardia Airport. The flight, US Airways Flight 1549, became known as the Miracle on the Hudson plane. The river has been closed to commercial boating traffic, the US Coast Guard said. United States New York Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …At least one dead after a Bell 206 helicopter crashed into the river after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank At least one passenger has died after a helicopter which was believed to be carrying a group of British tourists crashed into New York’s East River after taking off from a launch pad on the riverbank. Three of the tourists and the pilot were taken to hospital after they were pulled out of the river, according to the authorities, who said that two of the injured, both women, were in a critical condition. Police and fire department divers pulled victims of the crash out of the Bell 407 after it was submerged in murky waters near 34th Street in midtown Manhattan. Detective Martin Speechley of the New York Police Department told Sky News that the recovery operation would have “been done by touch” because that part of the river was so murky. Dan Sweeney, manager at the nearby Water Club restaurant, told the NBC New York news outlet that the helicopter appeared to be in the process of landing when it crashed. “It went down pretty fast, you could see the splash, you could see the top of it and it just disappeared,” he said. “It looked like it was trying to land at the heliport and missed the landing.” Joy Garnett and her husband were on the dock waiting to take the East River ferry to Brooklyn when they heard the blades of a helicopter and saw it start to take off from the nearby helipad. She told the Associated Press that she saw it do “a funny curlicue.” “I thought, ‘Is that some daredevil move?’” she said. “But it was obviously out of control. The body spun around at least two or three times, and then it went down.” She said the chopper had lifted about 25 feet (7.6 meters) off the ground before it dropped into the water without much of a splash. It flipped over, and the blades were sticking up out of the river. She said people on the dock started throwing in life jackets and buoys. Two people came up out of the waves. “It didn’t make much noise,” she said. “It was just a splash and sunk.” The weather was clear but a little windy at the time of the incident, with winds gusting up to 20 mph (32 kph) and visibility of 10 miles (16 kilometers), according to the weather station at LaGuardia airport. There were a few clouds at 3,500 feet (1,066 meters) above sea level, well above the typical flying altitude for helicopters. Carlos Acevedo, of Puerto Rico, was with his wife at a nearby park area when they saw the helicopter go down. “It sank fast,” he said. “In seconds. Like the water was sucking it in.” Lau Kamg was leaving a dentist’s office and was walking nearby when he saw the chopper go down, and he said it appeared to be in distress. “The sound got my attention,” he said. I saw it splash.” In August 2009, a small plane collided with a helicopter over the Hudson River, on the other side of Manhattan, killing nine people, including five Italian tourists. A government safety panel found that an air traffic controller who was on a personal phone call had contributed to the accident. The Federal Aviation Administration changed its rules for aircraft flying over New York City’s rivers after that collision. Pilots must call out their positions on the radio and obey a 161 mph speed limit. Before the changes, such radio calls were optional. Earlier that year, an Airbus 320 airliner landed in the Hudson after hitting birds and losing both engines shortly after taking off from LaGuardia Airport. The flight, US Airways Flight 1549, became known as the Miracle on the Hudson plane. The river has been closed to commercial boating traffic, the US Coast Guard said. United States New York Ben Quinn guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Justice secretary disputes home secretary’s tale of deportation halted over ownership of pet cat Downing Street rallied to the defence of Theresa May after the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, mocked her for suggesting that an illegal immigrant had resisted deportation on the grounds that he owned a pet cat. Friends of the justice secretary insisted he was standing firm after No 10 sources indicated that a humbled Clarke should show contrition by taking May, the home secretary, out for a “nice slap-up meal”. One of the quietest conference seasons in years came alive on its penultimate day when Clarke took issue with the announcement in May’s conference speech – that illegal immigrants are abusing the Human Rights Act to fight deportation from Britain. The home secretary illustrated her case by citing the example of a Bolivian national who resisted deportation on the grounds he owned a cat, Maya. May, who wants to abolish the Human Rights Act, said : “The illegal immigrant who cannot be deported because – I am not making this up – he had a pet cat.” Speaking an hour later at a fringe meeting, hosted by the Daily Telegraph, Clarke ridiculed May’s remarks. Clarke, a strong defender of the European convention on human rights, which provided the basis for the HRA, said: “I’ve never had a conversation on the subject with Theresa, so I’d have to find out about these strange cases she is throwing out. They are British cases and British judges she is complaining about. I cannot believe anybody has ever had deportation refused on the basis of owning a cat. I’ll have a small bet with her that nobody has ever been refused deportation on the grounds of the ownership of a cat.” The remarks by the justice secretary triggered a string of jokes on Twitter about a catfight involving Clarke, May and a cat whose name is one letter longer than the home secretary’s surname. Stefan Stern, a professor at the Cass Business School, even managed to link the spat to the phone-hacking scandal. “Neither the cat nor Coulson were properly vetted,” he tweeted at #kittygate. But as the jokes – and the proverbial fur – flew on Twitter, a classic briefing war erupted in Manchester between the cabinet ministers’ camps. Home Office sources said Clarke was wrong because the immigration judge had cited the case of Maya the cat when he ruled against deportation. This was dismissed on appeal. A Home Office source said: “This shows why we need clarification. There is a complete lack of clarity here.” But sources in the Clarke camp cited a statement by the judicial communications office, which represents senior judges, insisting the tale was not true and said it had told May’s department as much. A spokeswoman for the judicial communications office said: “This was a case in which the Home Office conceded that they had mistakenly failed to apply their own policy – applying at that time to that appellant – for dealing with unmarried partners of people settled in the UK.’ A friend of Clarke said: “That statement is really serious. That is the authentic voice of the judiciary. We have a situation where the home secretary – the home secretary – has made a mistake on a basic point. The Home Office are going bananas because they know Theresa made a mistake.” But Downing Street sources defended May and turned its humour on Clarke as it said that Clarke should hand her a fiver after losing his bet. One source said: “David Cameron really likes the policy announced by Theresa May. Ken wanted reassurance that a cat was not involved. He has had that.” In a final flourish of humour, the source said: I am sure he will want to pause for thought. Get it?” May used the example of the cat to illustrate the need to amend immigration rules to restrict the ability of illegal immigrants and foreign criminals to resist deportation by invoking the right to a family life under article eight of the Human Rights Act. This incorporates rights enshrined in the European convention on human rights (ECHR). May’s speech was not shown to Clarke. In common with conference speeches by all cabinet minsters, it was cleared with the “quad” committee of David Cameron, Nick Clegg, George Osborne and Danny Alexander. Sadiq Khan, the shadow justice secretary, said: “The energy and time this government is spending on arguments about the HRA shows how completely out of touch it is with the British people who are not interested in catfights between ministers but how the safety of their communities will be protected after cuts in police budgets which go too far and too fast.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Kenneth Clarke Theresa May Human rights Human Rights Act Nicholas Watt Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Justice secretary disputes home secretary’s tale of deportation halted over ownership of pet cat Downing Street rallied to the defence of Theresa May after the justice secretary, Kenneth Clarke, mocked her for suggesting that an illegal immigrant had resisted deportation on the grounds that he owned a pet cat. Friends of the justice secretary insisted he was standing firm after No 10 sources indicated that a humbled Clarke should show contrition by taking May, the home secretary, out for a “nice slap-up meal”. One of the quietest conference seasons in years came alive on its penultimate day when Clarke took issue with the announcement in May’s conference speech – that illegal immigrants are abusing the Human Rights Act to fight deportation from Britain. The home secretary illustrated her case by citing the example of a Bolivian national who resisted deportation on the grounds he owned a cat, Maya. May, who wants to abolish the Human Rights Act, said : “The illegal immigrant who cannot be deported because – I am not making this up – he had a pet cat.” Speaking an hour later at a fringe meeting, hosted by the Daily Telegraph, Clarke ridiculed May’s remarks. Clarke, a strong defender of the European convention on human rights, which provided the basis for the HRA, said: “I’ve never had a conversation on the subject with Theresa, so I’d have to find out about these strange cases she is throwing out. They are British cases and British judges she is complaining about. I cannot believe anybody has ever had deportation refused on the basis of owning a cat. I’ll have a small bet with her that nobody has ever been refused deportation on the grounds of the ownership of a cat.” The remarks by the justice secretary triggered a string of jokes on Twitter about a catfight involving Clarke, May and a cat whose name is one letter longer than the home secretary’s surname. Stefan Stern, a professor at the Cass Business School, even managed to link the spat to the phone-hacking scandal. “Neither the cat nor Coulson were properly vetted,” he tweeted at #kittygate. But as the jokes – and the proverbial fur – flew on Twitter, a classic briefing war erupted in Manchester between the cabinet ministers’ camps. Home Office sources said Clarke was wrong because the immigration judge had cited the case of Maya the cat when he ruled against deportation. This was dismissed on appeal. A Home Office source said: “This shows why we need clarification. There is a complete lack of clarity here.” But sources in the Clarke camp cited a statement by the judicial communications office, which represents senior judges, insisting the tale was not true and said it had told May’s department as much. A spokeswoman for the judicial communications office said: “This was a case in which the Home Office conceded that they had mistakenly failed to apply their own policy – applying at that time to that appellant – for dealing with unmarried partners of people settled in the UK.’ A friend of Clarke said: “That statement is really serious. That is the authentic voice of the judiciary. We have a situation where the home secretary – the home secretary – has made a mistake on a basic point. The Home Office are going bananas because they know Theresa made a mistake.” But Downing Street sources defended May and turned its humour on Clarke as it said that Clarke should hand her a fiver after losing his bet. One source said: “David Cameron really likes the policy announced by Theresa May. Ken wanted reassurance that a cat was not involved. He has had that.” In a final flourish of humour, the source said: I am sure he will want to pause for thought. Get it?” May used the example of the cat to illustrate the need to amend immigration rules to restrict the ability of illegal immigrants and foreign criminals to resist deportation by invoking the right to a family life under article eight of the Human Rights Act. This incorporates rights enshrined in the European convention on human rights (ECHR). May’s speech was not shown to Clarke. In common with conference speeches by all cabinet minsters, it was cleared with the “quad” committee of David Cameron, Nick Clegg, George Osborne and Danny Alexander. Sadiq Khan, the shadow justice secretary, said: “The energy and time this government is spending on arguments about the HRA shows how completely out of touch it is with the British people who are not interested in catfights between ministers but how the safety of their communities will be protected after cuts in police budgets which go too far and too fast.” Conservative conference 2011 Conservative conference Kenneth Clarke Theresa May Human rights Human Rights Act Nicholas Watt Alan Travis guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …