In last week’s angry debate, Rick Perry resurrected allegations that Mitt Romney hired a lawn service that used undocumented immigrants—and that may not be the final illegal immigrant discussion Romney gets pulled into. The Los Angeles Times reports that his 2006 health care law’s Health Safety Net program allows…
Continue reading …In “The Divided Brain” by RSA, psychiatrist and writer Iain McGilchrist gives a fascinating talk about the left and right hemispheres of the brain, their often misunderstood properties, and their effect on people and society. The lecture is part of the brilliant animated educational series RSA Animate. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Laughing Squid Discovery Date : 21/10/2011 12:44 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …In “The Divided Brain” by RSA, psychiatrist and writer Iain McGilchrist gives a fascinating talk about the left and right hemispheres of the brain, their often misunderstood properties, and their effect on people and society. The lecture is part of the brilliant animated educational series RSA Animate. Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : Laughing Squid Discovery Date : 21/10/2011 12:44 Number of articles : 4
Continue reading …Paul and Rachel Chandler, who were held hostage in Somalia, say UK authorities offered only ‘tea and sympathy’ to their family The British couple kidnapped from their yacht and held hostage for 13 months in Somalia have said the Foreign Office provided nothing but “tea and sympathy” to their family. Paul and Rachel Chandler, seized after leaving the Seychelles bound for Tanzania in October 2009, told a committee of MPs that the Foreign Office did not have the “expertise” to deal with kidnappings. Paul Chandler, 61, said it had only contacted their family “four days after the news was in the public domain”. By that time relatives were “bewildered, uncertain, and unadvised”, while being hounded by the media for information. The Foreign Office should have advised the family “at the earliest possible moment” about the general situation regarding hostages and kidnappings in Somalia. It should have advised them not to speak to the media “because it was well known that by far the best thing for a hostage is a press blackout”. If their family had known that “it would perhaps have had significant beneficial consequences,” he said. It should also have told the family “we can’t help you – but here’s a man who can”. Because of lack of political influence in Somalia, and British government policy not to pay ransoms, Chandler said the family should have been told: “If you need help, the private sector can help. Perhaps you should contact these people.” It was more appropriate for police to take the lead in such situations, he said, as they had expertise in criminal kidnappings. “We were just the hostages, but our families were the victim of extortion.” The couple were giving evidence at the foreign affairs committee inquiry into piracy off Somalia. Most of their evidence was given in private for the sake of Judith Tebbutt, who is still being held. The couple, originally from Tunbridge Wells, Kent, but now living in Dartmouth, Devon, were released last November for an unconfirmed ransom of up to £620,000. Rachel Chandler, 57, said: “What the Foreign Office did provide was essentially tea and sympathy. And in doing so, I think, it rubbed our family up the wrong way.” The couple’s suspected captors are being tried in Kenya over the hijacking of a French vessel. The Chandlers said they understood the British and Kenyan authorities are discussing whether they will also face trial over their case. The Metropolitan police is said to have handed a file to the Crown Prosecution Service. “I’d like to see them prosecuted by the UK. Not necessarily physically in the UK,” said Paul Chandler, “and yes, we would be happy to give evidence.” The couple said there had been no warnings, from the Foreign Office, their insurers or the authorities in the Seychelles that their route to Tanzania would put them at high risk from piracy. Rachel Chandler added they would continue sailing: “Cruising is our chosen lifestyle and we want to continue cruising for as long as we are able. We’re certainly not defeated by what happened to us”. Piracy at sea Somalia Africa Foreign policy Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Paul and Rachel Chandler, who were held hostage in Somalia, say UK authorities offered only ‘tea and sympathy’ to their family The British couple kidnapped from their yacht and held hostage for 13 months in Somalia have said the Foreign Office provided nothing but “tea and sympathy” to their family. Paul and Rachel Chandler, seized after leaving the Seychelles bound for Tanzania in October 2009, told a committee of MPs that the Foreign Office did not have the “expertise” to deal with kidnappings. Paul Chandler, 61, said it had only contacted their family “four days after the news was in the public domain”. By that time relatives were “bewildered, uncertain, and unadvised”, while being hounded by the media for information. The Foreign Office should have advised the family “at the earliest possible moment” about the general situation regarding hostages and kidnappings in Somalia. It should have advised them not to speak to the media “because it was well known that by far the best thing for a hostage is a press blackout”. If their family had known that “it would perhaps have had significant beneficial consequences,” he said. It should also have told the family “we can’t help you – but here’s a man who can”. Because of lack of political influence in Somalia, and British government policy not to pay ransoms, Chandler said the family should have been told: “If you need help, the private sector can help. Perhaps you should contact these people.” It was more appropriate for police to take the lead in such situations, he said, as they had expertise in criminal kidnappings. “We were just the hostages, but our families were the victim of extortion.” The couple were giving evidence at the foreign affairs committee inquiry into piracy off Somalia. Most of their evidence was given in private for the sake of Judith Tebbutt, who is still being held. The couple, originally from Tunbridge Wells, Kent, but now living in Dartmouth, Devon, were released last November for an unconfirmed ransom of up to £620,000. Rachel Chandler, 57, said: “What the Foreign Office did provide was essentially tea and sympathy. And in doing so, I think, it rubbed our family up the wrong way.” The couple’s suspected captors are being tried in Kenya over the hijacking of a French vessel. The Chandlers said they understood the British and Kenyan authorities are discussing whether they will also face trial over their case. The Metropolitan police is said to have handed a file to the Crown Prosecution Service. “I’d like to see them prosecuted by the UK. Not necessarily physically in the UK,” said Paul Chandler, “and yes, we would be happy to give evidence.” The couple said there had been no warnings, from the Foreign Office, their insurers or the authorities in the Seychelles that their route to Tanzania would put them at high risk from piracy. Rachel Chandler added they would continue sailing: “Cruising is our chosen lifestyle and we want to continue cruising for as long as we are able. We’re certainly not defeated by what happened to us”. Piracy at sea Somalia Africa Foreign policy Caroline Davies guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …Actress Margot Robbie has left her home of Australia to work on the new ABC television show ‘Pan Am.’ She plays Laura Cameron, a runaway bride turned-Pan Am stewardess, who is following in the footsteps of her older sister Kate. (Oct. 24)
Continue reading …Actress Margot Robbie has left her home of Australia to work on the new ABC television show ‘Pan Am.’ She plays Laura Cameron, a runaway bride turned-Pan Am stewardess, who is following in the footsteps of her older sister Kate. (Oct. 24)
Continue reading …So $150 million of our money is going to a government facility in lower Manhattan where representatives of Wall Street firms get to sit alongside the New York Police Department and spy on your basic law-abiding citizens: According to newly unearthed documents, the planning for this high tech facility on lower Broadway dates back six years. In correspondence from 2005 that rests quietly in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s archives, NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly promised Edward Forst, a Goldman Sachs’ Executive Vice President at the time, that the NYPD “is committed to the development and implementation of a comprehensive security plan for Lower Manhattan . . . One component of the plan will be a centralized coordination center that will provide space for full-time, on-site representation from Goldman Sachs and other stakeholders.” At the time, Goldman Sachs was in the process of extracting concessions from New York City just short of the Mayor’s firstborn in exchange for constructing its new headquarters building at 200 West Street, adjacent to the World Financial Center and in the general area of where the new World Trade Center complex would be built. According to the 2005 documents, Goldman’s deal included $1.65 billion in Liberty Bonds, up to $160 million in sales tax abatements for construction materials and tenant furnishings, and the deal-breaker requirement that a security plan that gave it a seat at the NYPD’s Coordination Center would be in place by no later than December 31, 2009. The surveillance plan became known as the Lower Manhattan Security Initiative and the facility was eventually dubbed the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center. It operates round-the-clock. Under the imprimatur of the largest police department in the United States, 2,000 private spy cameras owned by Wall Street firms, together with approximately 1,000 more owned by the NYPD, are relaying live video feeds of people on the streets in lower Manhattan to the center. Once at the center, they can be integrated for analysis. At least 700 cameras scour the midtown area and also relay their live feeds into the downtown center where low-wage NYPD, MTA and Port Authority crime stoppers sit alongside high-wage personnel from Wall Street firms that are currently under at least 51 Federal and state corruption probes for mortgage securitization fraud and other matters. In addition to video analytics which can, for example, track a person based on the color of their hat or jacket, insiders say the NYPD either has or is working on face recognition software which could track individuals based on facial features. The center is also equipped with live feeds from license plate readers. According to one person who has toured the center, there are three rows of computer workstations, with approximately two-thirds operated by non-NYPD personnel . The Chief-Leader, the weekly civil service newspaper, identified some of the outside entities that share the space: Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, the Federal Reserve, the New York Stock Exchange. Others say most of the major Wall Street firms have an on-site representative. Two calls and an email to Paul Browne, NYPD Deputy Commissioner of Public Information, seeking the names of the other Wall Street firms at the center were not returned. An email seeking the same information to City Council Member, Peter Vallone, who chairs the Public Safety Committee, was not returned. In a press release dated October 4, 2009 announcing the expansion of the surveillance territory, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Kelly had this to say: “The Midtown Manhattan Security Initiative will add additional cameras and license plate readers installed at key locations between 30th and 60th Streets from river to river. It will also identify additional private organizations who will work alongside NYPD personnel in the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center, where corporate and other security representatives from Lower Manhattan have been co-located with police since June 2009 . The Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center is the central hub for both initiatives, where all the collected data are analyzed.” [Italic emphasis added.] The project has been funded by New York City taxpayers as well as all U.S. taxpayers through grants from the Federal Department of Homeland Security. On March 26, 2009, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) wrote a letter to Commissioner Kelly, noting that even though the system involves “massive expenditures of public money, there have been no public hearings about any aspect of the system…we reject the Department’s assertion of ‘plenary power’ over all matters touching on public safety . . . the Department is of course subject to the laws and Constitution of the United States and of the State of New York as well as to regulation by the New York City Council.”
Continue reading …So $150 million of our money is going to a government facility in lower Manhattan where representatives of Wall Street firms get to sit alongside the New York Police Department and spy on your basic law-abiding citizens: According to newly unearthed documents, the planning for this high tech facility on lower Broadway dates back six years. In correspondence from 2005 that rests quietly in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s archives, NYPD Commissioner Raymond Kelly promised Edward Forst, a Goldman Sachs’ Executive Vice President at the time, that the NYPD “is committed to the development and implementation of a comprehensive security plan for Lower Manhattan . . . One component of the plan will be a centralized coordination center that will provide space for full-time, on-site representation from Goldman Sachs and other stakeholders.” At the time, Goldman Sachs was in the process of extracting concessions from New York City just short of the Mayor’s firstborn in exchange for constructing its new headquarters building at 200 West Street, adjacent to the World Financial Center and in the general area of where the new World Trade Center complex would be built. According to the 2005 documents, Goldman’s deal included $1.65 billion in Liberty Bonds, up to $160 million in sales tax abatements for construction materials and tenant furnishings, and the deal-breaker requirement that a security plan that gave it a seat at the NYPD’s Coordination Center would be in place by no later than December 31, 2009. The surveillance plan became known as the Lower Manhattan Security Initiative and the facility was eventually dubbed the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center. It operates round-the-clock. Under the imprimatur of the largest police department in the United States, 2,000 private spy cameras owned by Wall Street firms, together with approximately 1,000 more owned by the NYPD, are relaying live video feeds of people on the streets in lower Manhattan to the center. Once at the center, they can be integrated for analysis. At least 700 cameras scour the midtown area and also relay their live feeds into the downtown center where low-wage NYPD, MTA and Port Authority crime stoppers sit alongside high-wage personnel from Wall Street firms that are currently under at least 51 Federal and state corruption probes for mortgage securitization fraud and other matters. In addition to video analytics which can, for example, track a person based on the color of their hat or jacket, insiders say the NYPD either has or is working on face recognition software which could track individuals based on facial features. The center is also equipped with live feeds from license plate readers. According to one person who has toured the center, there are three rows of computer workstations, with approximately two-thirds operated by non-NYPD personnel . The Chief-Leader, the weekly civil service newspaper, identified some of the outside entities that share the space: Goldman Sachs, Citigroup, the Federal Reserve, the New York Stock Exchange. Others say most of the major Wall Street firms have an on-site representative. Two calls and an email to Paul Browne, NYPD Deputy Commissioner of Public Information, seeking the names of the other Wall Street firms at the center were not returned. An email seeking the same information to City Council Member, Peter Vallone, who chairs the Public Safety Committee, was not returned. In a press release dated October 4, 2009 announcing the expansion of the surveillance territory, Mayor Michael Bloomberg and Police Commissioner Kelly had this to say: “The Midtown Manhattan Security Initiative will add additional cameras and license plate readers installed at key locations between 30th and 60th Streets from river to river. It will also identify additional private organizations who will work alongside NYPD personnel in the Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center, where corporate and other security representatives from Lower Manhattan have been co-located with police since June 2009 . The Lower Manhattan Security Coordination Center is the central hub for both initiatives, where all the collected data are analyzed.” [Italic emphasis added.] The project has been funded by New York City taxpayers as well as all U.S. taxpayers through grants from the Federal Department of Homeland Security. On March 26, 2009, the New York Civil Liberties Union (NYCLU) wrote a letter to Commissioner Kelly, noting that even though the system involves “massive expenditures of public money, there have been no public hearings about any aspect of the system…we reject the Department’s assertion of ‘plenary power’ over all matters touching on public safety . . . the Department is of course subject to the laws and Constitution of the United States and of the State of New York as well as to regulation by the New York City Council.”
Continue reading …Radiohead asked people to pay what they wanted for their 2007 album, In Rainbows. Perhaps Jon Bon Jovi was paying close attention. He’s opened a community restaurant, Soul Kitchen in Red Bank, N.J., and the twist is that it’s a pay-what-you-can restaurant. The 49-year-old is intrinsically linked with New Jersey, so it should come as
Continue reading …