Click here to view this media h/t Video Cafe for the video) Frank Bruni of the NY Times wrote a piece called ‘ Mitt’s Muffled Soul ,’ which discussed Romney’s campaign and the lengths he has gone to to avoid discussing his Mormon religion. When Romney first ran for president in 2008, there was so much discussion about the potential impact of his Mormonism, and his own concern about it was deep enough, that he delivered a set-piece speech designed to rebut any lingering impression of the religion as an exotic, even loopy sect. In that painstakingly calibrated address, he said the word Mormon all of once. Christ or Christianity came up repeatedly. Four years later, he still avoids the word, trumpeting his faithfulness without specifying the faith. What’s surprising is that no one around him — not reporters, not rivals — talks about it all that much, either. The Romney-Gingrich showdowns in South Carolina and Florida got plenty nasty: at one point the Gingrich camp, flashing back to Romney’s term as Massachusetts governor, falsely accused him of pretty much wresting kosher food from the mouths of Holocaust survivors. But neither Gingrich nor his allies played the Mormon card, even though nearly 20 percent of the Republicans and independents surveyed by Gallup last year said they wouldn’t support a Mormon presidential candidate. It’s a very neutral piece and asks some good questions. The GOP has put religion smack in the middle of their presidential primary as soon as it began and in recent weeks it has been ramped up. Reporters are obviously more afraid than usual of being labeled anti-religion since the new dog whistle coming out of the GOP camp is called “religious freedom” so I doubt they will go near this topic unless events really force them to. I was surprised to see this opening for CNN’s Reliable Sources. Check out Howard Kurtz’ first question to Bruni in the segment called Pressing Romney on Religion : KURTZ: “New York Times” columnist Frank Bruni says that’s precisely why the Mormon question is fair game. “There are valid reasons,” he writes, “for the rest of us to hone in on Romney’s religion, not in terms of its historical eccentricities but in terms of its cultural, psychological, and emotional imprint on him. His aloofness, guardedness, and sporadic defensiveness: are these entwined with the experience of belonging to a minority tribe that has often been maligned and has operated in secret?” But should the media be setting those boundaries? Joining us now in New York is Frank Bruni of “The Times”; and here in Washington, Jennifer Rubin, who writes “The Right Turn” blog for “The Washington Post”; and Scott Conroy, national political reporter for “Real Clear Politics” and CBS News. Frank Bruni, start with you. So why is Romney’s faith or why should it be any of the media’s business? Right from the start of the interview Howard attaches negative connotations to the idea that Americans would want to know anything about the Mormon faith and reporters have no business bringing it up. Bruni handles it quite deftly: FRANK BRUNI, NEW YORK TIMES: Well, I think when you’re running for president, the public, the media — we have a right to know as much as we can about you. I mean, we want to take your full measure as a human being. And if a big part of your biography, if a big part of who you are is your religious faith, then I think that needs to be discussed. I think it’s wise for the candidate himself to discuss it. And I think it’s entirely fair game for us to ask questions about it. We — you’re running for president of the United States, highest office there is. We need to know who you are, where you’re coming from, what animates you, what’s important to you . Exactly so why is Kurtz so bothered by his column? It’s the truth. Before I published my post on Romney’s great–grand father’s polygamist past and exodus to Mexico in the 1880′s on 01/04/12, the media refused to even gaze into Romney’s family history or religion this election cycle and he’s running for the highest office in our country. Now at least a few media outfits have started to tackle the topic. I find the story of Mormonism, which was founded in America, Joseph Smith and the Romney’s ties to it a fascinating story and my writing has been about that information on C&L Just recently a huge article hit the LA Times because the LDS Church apologized to the Jewish community for their continued practice of Baptisms of The Dead on Holocaust survivors after they had promised not to do that anymore. The Daily Beast has republished a Newsweek interview from 2007 where Mitt Romney says he used to be part of that practice, but doesn’t anymore. Romney’s biography is fully Mormon. When asked by NEWSWEEK if he has done baptisms for the dead—in which Mormons find the names of dead people of all faiths and baptize them, as an LDS spokesperson says, to “open the door” to the highest heaven—he looked slightly startled and answered, “I have in my life, but I haven’t recently.” The awareness of how odd this will sound to many Americans is what makes Romney hesitant to elaborate on the Mormon question. So why does the topic bother Howard so much in this online video ? It’s news plain and simple. The religious right in the GOP is going all in against Obama on contraception now even though the country solidly disagrees with that position and Santorum is attacking Obama’s religion head on with outlandish statements so why isn’t that offensive to the media?
Continue reading …Yesterday’s riot at a prison in northern Mexico not only killed 44 inmates, but also covered up the escape of 30 members of the infamous Zeta drug cartel, Mexican officials say. “Without a doubt there was premeditation,” says the governor of Nuevo Leon, Rodrigo Medina. “This was planned.” All of…
Continue reading …A Colorado town with the motto “Honor the Past, Envision the Future” is considering three more letters to advertise itself: “WTF”—as in, “Welcome to Fruita.” A couple printed out 500 stickers with the term and handed them out to businesses in downtown Fruita, sparking the idea of a new…
Continue reading …The UK government is working on an anti-terror plan that would require service providers to record and store details on every call, text, email, or even Twitter direct message sent by anyone in the country—along with all their complete browsing history. Companies would then keep that info on file…
Continue reading …Click here to view this media This is what happens when you spend too much time ‘paling around’ with Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum . Santorum Spokesperson Refers To Obama’s ‘Radical Islamic Policies’ : Rick Santorum spokesperson Alice Stewart slipped up on MSNBC Monday afternoon when talking about President Obama’s environmental policies. Instead, she called them Obama’s “radical Islamic policies.” Santorum communications director Hogan Gidley told TPM that Stewart “misspoke.”
Continue reading …Jayson Blair’s name carries with it a chilling cautionary tale of a young journalist’s rise to success, while also recalling the story that tarnished the longstanding reputation of the New York Times. But while a new off-Broadway play, “CQ/CX,” glimpses one of the newspaper industry’s biggest scandals, the disgraced reporter is giving life advice in
Continue reading …A veteran skydiver, who’d completed 8,000 jumps and trained Navy SEALs, plummeted to his death at a skydiving competition Saturday morning in San Diego. Sean Carey attempted a maneuver known as “swooping,” which requires the diver to fly just feet above the ground at speeds up to 60 mph, the Press-Enterprise reports. Failing to pull
Continue reading …Click here to view this media Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Sunday likened the upcoming U.S. election to World War II. While the candidate’s comments to a packed First Redeemer Church in Cumming, Georgia were somewhat vague, NBC news noted that he “seemed to compare President [Barack] Obama to [Adolf] Hitler.” The former Pennsylvania senator told his supporters that this election was like World War II, “where our closest ally, Britain, was being bombed and leveled.” “And America sat from 1940 when France fell to December of ’41 and did almost nothing,” he explained. “Why? Because we’re a hopeful people. We think, ‘You know it will get better. Yeah, I mean, he’s a nice guy. It won’t be near as bad as what we think. You know, this will be OK. You know, maybe he’s not the best guy.’ After a while, you found out some things about this guy over in Europe and maybe he’s not so good of a guy after all. But you know what? ‘Why do we need to be involved? We’ll just take care of our own problems, just get our families off to work and our kids off to school and we’ll be OK.’” The candidate added: “Sometimes, sometimes it’s not OK.” As BuzzFeed pointed out earlier this year, it’s not the first time Santorum has compared his opponents to Adolf Hitler. During a 2005 speech on the Senate floor, the then-senator blasted Senate Democrats for complaining that Republicans were trying to stop them from filibustering President George W. Bush’s judicial appointees. “It’s the equivalent of Adolf Hitler in 1942: ‘I’m in Paris. How dare you invade me? How dare you bomb my city? It’s mine,’” he said. Over the weekend, Santorum also said that Obama’s theology was not “based on the Bible.” He later clarified that he wasn’t questioning if the president was a Christian.
Continue reading …[caption id="attachment_245789" align="alignright" width="314" caption="Image source: Sports Grid"] [/caption] ESPN has fired the employee responsible for using a racial slur in its headline about New York Knicks basketball sensation Jeremy Lin, the network said Sunday. The headline “Chink in the Armor” appeared briefly on ESPN’s mobile website after the Knicks lost to the New Orleans Hornets Friday… Broadcasting platform : YouTube Source : The Blaze Discovery Date : 16/02/2012 19:37 Number of articles : 3
Continue reading …Hardline demands from northern European governments dampen hopes second rescue package will be signed off The Greek people and their government were on Monday being made to sweat at the hands of European finance ministers for a €130bn (£110bn) bailout to save the country from bankruptcy and the eurozone from collapse. Hardline demands from northern European governments dampened initial optimism that the eurogroup of 17 finance ministers would sign off on a second rescue package for the stricken Greek economy in less than two years. Jean-Claude Juncker, the prime minister of Luxembourg, who was chairing the meeting in Brussels, had said on arriving: “I am of the opinion that today we have to deliver, because we don’t have any more time”. The brinkmanship came amid conflicting assessments of the likely impact of a Greek debt default, with some arguing it would provoke runs on banks and a pan-European depression and others insisting it would swiftly be contained and ultimately encourage new Greek competitiveness. Greece must repay €14.4bn of its debt by 20 March, but some European diplomats said the bailout might not be finalised until just days before that deadline – if at all. The Dutch and Germans refused to endorse the package even though Evangelos Venizelos, the Greek finance minister, who arrived with his prime minister, Lucas Papademos, insisted Athens had now met all the conditions for the bailout. “For Greeks, this is a matter of national dignity and a national strategic choice and no other integrated and responsible choice can be opposed to it,” he declared. Jan Kees de Jager, his Dutch counterpart, raised the stakes before what promised to be a long and stormy meeting, by resetting tough conditions for approving the bailout, including the permanent stationing of non-Greek fiscal watchdogs in Athens. “Greece wants the money and so far we haven’t given them anything. We have said no over the past weeks. We can afford to say to no until Greece has met all the demands. It’s up to Greece and the troika [European Central Bank, IMF and European Commission] to say whether this has been done and for us it is a no until Greece has done so. If Greece lives up to all its obligations, then the Netherlands will also do its part,” he said. Dutch sources said the conservative-led minority government in the Hague would refuse to sign up for any deal that did not commit the Greek government to deliver a debt-to-GDP ratio of 120% by 2020 and allowed a drift to, say, 125% or 129% – the level assumed by the troika’s latest analysis of Greece’s depressed economy, which contracted 7% last year. “Debt sustainability is a key issue for us too,” said a German source, pointing out that the IMF would also refuse to back a deal that did not ensure such sustainability. Christine Lagarde, the IMF managing director, simply noted that Greece had made “significant efforts”. The IMF has already indicated that, whereas it contributed around a third of the first €109bn Greek rescue package, it would pay only 10-15% this time – forcing eurozone governments to pay in more. Dutch officials made plain there could be no question of increasing the rescue package to €138bn, as suggested in some quarters because the Greek economy is contracting faster than expected. “We’ve seen that Greece time and time again fails to satisfy the conditions that the international community makes … In the Netherlands, it really is an issue that you have to lend money to a country that for the umpteenth time hasn’t held itself to its agreements,” De Jager said. The German finance minister, Wolfgang Schäuble, said on arrival that he was confident a deal would be struck, but Berlin officials made plain there was an array of issues to be settled first – not least ensuring that Athens lived up to its promises, cut spending, reformed its archaic labour laws and repaid its debts. “We’re not talking about imposing commissars on each Greek ministry as it’s sometimes alleged in Athens, but ensuring that these fiscal commitments are met. That needs constant surveillance, but the mechanism for doing so is yet to be agreed,” one said. The German government is suggesting that the specially-designated (escrow) account set up to ensure that bailout monies are used to service debt and not for general public spending should be controlled by, say, senior IMF and Greek National [central] Bank officials. The conflict continued ahead of a likely decision by all 27 EU finance ministers, including the British chancellor, George Osborne, on Tuesday to approve new powers for Brussels to monitor fiscal policy within eurozone countries – and demand budget changes, in an unprecedented erosion of national sovereignty. There were some reports that Athens and Brussels had agreed that both the ECB and national central banks would take part in the debt relief programme by putting some of their profits on Greek debt into the bailout fund. But a deal with private bondholders, a core element of the overall agreement, was also at risk because the banks and other institutions could be forced to accept an even deeper “haircut” than the 70% discussed with Athens. Greek sources indicated this was part of the tense negotiations and might unravel. Any deal agreed also needs to be ratified by the parliaments of Germany, the Netherlands and Finland. The Bundestag is to debate the package on 27 February, though this may slip because of delays in completing its final details, and is certain to approve it despite loud complaints about Greek “fecklessness”. “There’s been a complete breakdown of trust between Germans and Greeks,” one European diplomat said. “The atmosphere has got extremely nasty, with all this talk of sending in the controllers.” Earlier, David Cameron tried to shift the focus of next week’s EU summit to jobs and growth by releasing an eight-point letter signed by himself and 11 other government heads – including Italy’s Mario Monti and Spain’s Mariano Rajoy. It was the first time the Italian and Spanish premiers had backed such a UK-led initiative. But conspicuously absent from the declaration, which urged a boost to growth via liberalisation of services, were the names of Angela Merkel, the German chancellor, and Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, who traditionally launch their own “call to arms” before each EU summit. Greece European Union Europe Germany Netherlands Finland Euro Eurozone crisis European Central Bank Banking Euro Financial crisis David Gow guardian.co.uk
Continue reading …