Home » Archives by category » News (Page 147)
Cold homes will kill up to 200 older people a day, warns Age UK

Rising energy bills will put millions at risk from ‘fuel poverty gap’ Two hundred people, most of them elderly, will die in Britain of cold-related diseases every day this winter, according to calculations by Britain’s leading advocacy group for old people, Age UK. “The fact that these ‘excess’ deaths occur in winter makes it clear that they are due directly to cold,” the organisation’s research manager, Philip Rossall, said. “And the fact that other, colder countries have lower excess winter deaths means that there is no reason that they are not preventable.” Age UK’s special adviser for policy, Mervyn Kohler, asked: “Why is this not a national scandal?” There were 26,156 excess winter deaths during 2009-10, with figures for 2010-11 to be published next month. “There is no reason to suppose that the worsening trend will not continue,” said Kohler. The charity’s figure of 200 deaths a day follows sharp price hikes by energy companies, credited with driving inflation to its highest level in 20 years. At the same time, a report by Britain’s leading academic expert on poverty and inequality, Professor John Hills of the London School of Economics, found a deepening “fuel poverty gap” . David Cameron hosted the “big six” energy companies at Downing Street to discuss the impact of soaring heating bills. He later urged consumers to insulate their homes properly and to “shop around” for deals. In his report, Hills found that 2,700 people among the 4.8 million in England and Wales living in fuel poverty (defined as spending more than 10% of income on heat and light) died in the winter of 2008-09 as a direct result – a steady increase for the third year running. But Age UK’s briefing paper makes a distinction between deaths directly due to fuel poverty and what the charity calls “excess winter deaths” – resulting from illnesses caused or exacerbated by cold. “The way to measure the problem is excess winter deaths,” said Rossall. “These are deaths caused by the impact on health of cold. Of course, we see a warning light with a report saying that 2,700 people are dying in fuel poverty. But what we are saying is that this is not the only relevant figure. It doesn’t measure the scale of the problem.” Which is, according to the document, that “among older people, the effects of cold housing were evident in terms of higher mortality risk, physical health and mental health”. Of the 200 a day who die, Rossall said, “more than 90% are over 65, because they are more vulnerable and less able to cope with winter”. The briefing paper reported: “Deaths from hypothermia are rare, but cold weather and poor heating can contribute to deaths caused by circulatory diseases (responsible for 41% of all recorded deaths by natural causes) and by respiratory diseases (13%).” It continued: “Heart and circulatory diseases are the largest causes of mortality in adults over 65 (England and Wales), and are particularly affected by winter temperatures.” Diet can be affected, said Rossall, as elderly people are obliged to make a choice between heat and food. Kohler added: “Cold is the difference. And unless cold is prevented, the deaths will rise.” The only way to prevent this, he said, was to stay warm, “and obviously if you increase the price, you ration the heat.” The report sets the UK’s appalling record in a European context: “Most dramatically, the UK has a higher rate of ‘excess winter deaths’ than other countries with colder climates.” It added: “From 1997-98, on average 18% of the UK’s winter deaths were excess, compared to the 10-12% in typically colder countries such as Finland, Sweden and Norway.” The figure for Germany and the Netherlands was 11%. “Sweden, Germany, Finland – these are the countries to emulate,” said Kohler. “Partly because local government is organised in a way that is more powerful and civic in its awareness of the impact of cold, and housing stock is very much better built and insulated. Although energy prices per unit are 50% higher in Sweden than in the UK, the average bill is 30% lower.” Regulation of tenancy was tighter in those countries, said Rossall, especially in the private rental sector – “and that is where the biggest problem is”. “The cost of heating an adequately sized house is estimated to be £1,300 a year,” said Kohler. “So if you are on pension credit of £7,000, you are very fuel-poor indeed.” He added that the prime minister’s recommendation for consumers to shop around was “inappropriate for many elderly people – it presumes either internet access people don’t have and hours waiting on the phone for people who cannot be understood”. Rossall added: “We are talking about people who become confused, people with dementia, vulnerable people.” “Most of our elderly people now live in poverty,” said Kohler, and one in six of the British population is now an elderly person living alone. Older people Poverty Social exclusion Energy industry Energy bills Ed Vulliamy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Cold homes will kill up to 200 older people a day, warns Age UK

Rising energy bills will put millions at risk from ‘fuel poverty gap’ Two hundred people, most of them elderly, will die in Britain of cold-related diseases every day this winter, according to calculations by Britain’s leading advocacy group for old people, Age UK. “The fact that these ‘excess’ deaths occur in winter makes it clear that they are due directly to cold,” the organisation’s research manager, Philip Rossall, said. “And the fact that other, colder countries have lower excess winter deaths means that there is no reason that they are not preventable.” Age UK’s special adviser for policy, Mervyn Kohler, asked: “Why is this not a national scandal?” There were 26,156 excess winter deaths during 2009-10, with figures for 2010-11 to be published next month. “There is no reason to suppose that the worsening trend will not continue,” said Kohler. The charity’s figure of 200 deaths a day follows sharp price hikes by energy companies, credited with driving inflation to its highest level in 20 years. At the same time, a report by Britain’s leading academic expert on poverty and inequality, Professor John Hills of the London School of Economics, found a deepening “fuel poverty gap” . David Cameron hosted the “big six” energy companies at Downing Street to discuss the impact of soaring heating bills. He later urged consumers to insulate their homes properly and to “shop around” for deals. In his report, Hills found that 2,700 people among the 4.8 million in England and Wales living in fuel poverty (defined as spending more than 10% of income on heat and light) died in the winter of 2008-09 as a direct result – a steady increase for the third year running. But Age UK’s briefing paper makes a distinction between deaths directly due to fuel poverty and what the charity calls “excess winter deaths” – resulting from illnesses caused or exacerbated by cold. “The way to measure the problem is excess winter deaths,” said Rossall. “These are deaths caused by the impact on health of cold. Of course, we see a warning light with a report saying that 2,700 people are dying in fuel poverty. But what we are saying is that this is not the only relevant figure. It doesn’t measure the scale of the problem.” Which is, according to the document, that “among older people, the effects of cold housing were evident in terms of higher mortality risk, physical health and mental health”. Of the 200 a day who die, Rossall said, “more than 90% are over 65, because they are more vulnerable and less able to cope with winter”. The briefing paper reported: “Deaths from hypothermia are rare, but cold weather and poor heating can contribute to deaths caused by circulatory diseases (responsible for 41% of all recorded deaths by natural causes) and by respiratory diseases (13%).” It continued: “Heart and circulatory diseases are the largest causes of mortality in adults over 65 (England and Wales), and are particularly affected by winter temperatures.” Diet can be affected, said Rossall, as elderly people are obliged to make a choice between heat and food. Kohler added: “Cold is the difference. And unless cold is prevented, the deaths will rise.” The only way to prevent this, he said, was to stay warm, “and obviously if you increase the price, you ration the heat.” The report sets the UK’s appalling record in a European context: “Most dramatically, the UK has a higher rate of ‘excess winter deaths’ than other countries with colder climates.” It added: “From 1997-98, on average 18% of the UK’s winter deaths were excess, compared to the 10-12% in typically colder countries such as Finland, Sweden and Norway.” The figure for Germany and the Netherlands was 11%. “Sweden, Germany, Finland – these are the countries to emulate,” said Kohler. “Partly because local government is organised in a way that is more powerful and civic in its awareness of the impact of cold, and housing stock is very much better built and insulated. Although energy prices per unit are 50% higher in Sweden than in the UK, the average bill is 30% lower.” Regulation of tenancy was tighter in those countries, said Rossall, especially in the private rental sector – “and that is where the biggest problem is”. “The cost of heating an adequately sized house is estimated to be £1,300 a year,” said Kohler. “So if you are on pension credit of £7,000, you are very fuel-poor indeed.” He added that the prime minister’s recommendation for consumers to shop around was “inappropriate for many elderly people – it presumes either internet access people don’t have and hours waiting on the phone for people who cannot be understood”. Rossall added: “We are talking about people who become confused, people with dementia, vulnerable people.” “Most of our elderly people now live in poverty,” said Kohler, and one in six of the British population is now an elderly person living alone. Older people Poverty Social exclusion Energy industry Energy bills Ed Vulliamy guardian.co.uk

Continue reading …
Population of world ‘could grow to 15bn by 2100′

Nearly 7 billion people now inhabit planet but projections that number will double this century have shocked academics The United Nations will warn this week that the world’s population could more than double to 15 billion by the end of this century, putting a catastrophic strain on the planet’s resources unless urgent action is taken to curb growth rates, the Observer can reveal. That figure is likely to shock many experts as it is far higher than many current estimates. A previous UN estimate had expected the world to have more than 10 billion people by 2100; currently, there are nearly 7 billion. The new figure is contained in a landmark study by the United Nations Population Fund (Unfpa) that will be released this week. The report – The State of World Population 2011 – is being compiled to mark the expected moment this month when somewhere on Earth a person will be born who will

Continue reading …
Population of world ‘could grow to 15bn by 2100′

Nearly 7 billion people now inhabit planet but projections that number will double this century have shocked academics The United Nations will warn this week that the world’s population could more than double to 15 billion by the end of this century, putting a catastrophic strain on the planet’s resources unless urgent action is taken to curb growth rates, the Observer can reveal. That figure is likely to shock many experts as it is far higher than many current estimates. A previous UN estimate had expected the world to have more than 10 billion people by 2100; currently, there are nearly 7 billion. The new figure is contained in a landmark study by the United Nations Population Fund (Unfpa) that will be released this week. The report – The State of World Population 2011 – is being compiled to mark the expected moment this month when somewhere on Earth a person will be born who will

Continue reading …
Libya Prepares for Road Ahead

Warning: Graphic video. Libya’s new leaders will declare liberation on Sunday, officials said, a move that will start the clock for elections after months of bloodshed that culminated in the death of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi. ( Oct. 22)

Continue reading …
Libya Prepares for Road Ahead

Warning: Graphic video. Libya’s new leaders will declare liberation on Sunday, officials said, a move that will start the clock for elections after months of bloodshed that culminated in the death of longtime dictator Moammar Gadhafi. ( Oct. 22)

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Russians Protest Upcoming Elections

Protesters gathered in Moscow on Saturday to denounce upcoming Parliamentary elections, claming that they will not be free. Activists have accused the government of disqualifying opposition parties from taking part in the elections. (Oct. 22)

Continue reading …
Raw Video: Russians Protest Upcoming Elections

Protesters gathered in Moscow on Saturday to denounce upcoming Parliamentary elections, claming that they will not be free. Activists have accused the government of disqualifying opposition parties from taking part in the elections. (Oct. 22)

Continue reading …

I thought this New York magazine story was illustrative about how big business in general operates now: If you can manage to creative a narrative that simulates a loss, you can force lesser beings to eat those losses , even if they’re only theoretical. Is this a great country, or what? If you’re wondering why the NBA is canceling preseason games and might very well cancel its season, you only have to head downtown. The Zuccotti Park protesters’ motivations are diverse, but it’s probably fair to say that what has really turned Occupy Wall Street from a meeting of the usual vegan anarchists into a larger cause is not the mere existence of banks, or even that they were bailed out, but the fact that they’re crying about taxes and regulations so soon after being saved from self-inflicted bankruptcy. In other words, they want the freedom to make whatever stupid decisions they please along with the guarantee that they will never have to suffer the consequences. Which is essentially what is happening in the NBA right now too. Actually, what Commissioner David Stern (who represents the league’s owners in their ­collective-bargaining dispute with the players) is up to might be even more audacious than what your Citigroups and AIGs got away with. Because at least we know that those companies did lose a ton of money . While the league asserts that its teams lost a collective $300 million last year, the NBA’s finances are opaque. It’s very much up for debate whether the league is losing money at all. Its self-reported revenues are rising faster than player salaries, and it’s hard to see why other expenses would be so onerous—of the nearly $2.1 billion spent on stadium construction and renovation since 2000, a Holy Cross study found, $1.75 billion was financed by taxpayers rather than ownership. And every time someone sells an NBA team, he sells it for much more than he bought it for . (A guy named Chris Cohan bought the Golden State Warriors before the 1995 season for $119 million, guided the team to the playoffs exactly once over the next sixteen years, then sold the team for $450 million two summers ago.) It seems that what losses there are would have to be largely the result of individual owners’ incompetence. Despite all that, according to writer Tom Ziller, the league’s most recent offer calls for a permanent yearly cut to player salaries of either $240 million or $280 million, depending on which beat reporter’s version of the owners’ offer you’re using. The players, then, would be locked into essentially paying for 80-plus percent of the owners’ losses, which may not actually exist and, if they do, owe at least partly to the awfulness of an economy that will eventually improve. (It will!) Meanwhile, bear in mind that owners do not have to give out big contracts to bad players if they don’t want to. Any team losing money can cut payroll. And that won’t necessarily affect on-court performance, because, as always in sports as in life, you don’t have to spend the most to be the best: The Oklahoma City Thunder paid its players $58 million and won 55 games last year, while the Toronto Raptors paid $70 million and won 22 (financial data provided by ShamSports.com). So here’s what the owners are saying to the players: “We’ve made so many poor spending choices lately that we’ve lost money, even without having to pay for our own facilities and even as the NBA has grown more popular. And we’d like you to give up enough money to make it almost a certainty that we never lose money again, even if we make all these same mistakes for a second time and the economy never improves.”

Continue reading …

I thought this New York magazine story was illustrative about how big business in general operates now: If you can manage to creative a narrative that simulates a loss, you can force lesser beings to eat those losses , even if they’re only theoretical. Is this a great country, or what? If you’re wondering why the NBA is canceling preseason games and might very well cancel its season, you only have to head downtown. The Zuccotti Park protesters’ motivations are diverse, but it’s probably fair to say that what has really turned Occupy Wall Street from a meeting of the usual vegan anarchists into a larger cause is not the mere existence of banks, or even that they were bailed out, but the fact that they’re crying about taxes and regulations so soon after being saved from self-inflicted bankruptcy. In other words, they want the freedom to make whatever stupid decisions they please along with the guarantee that they will never have to suffer the consequences. Which is essentially what is happening in the NBA right now too. Actually, what Commissioner David Stern (who represents the league’s owners in their ­collective-bargaining dispute with the players) is up to might be even more audacious than what your Citigroups and AIGs got away with. Because at least we know that those companies did lose a ton of money . While the league asserts that its teams lost a collective $300 million last year, the NBA’s finances are opaque. It’s very much up for debate whether the league is losing money at all. Its self-reported revenues are rising faster than player salaries, and it’s hard to see why other expenses would be so onerous—of the nearly $2.1 billion spent on stadium construction and renovation since 2000, a Holy Cross study found, $1.75 billion was financed by taxpayers rather than ownership. And every time someone sells an NBA team, he sells it for much more than he bought it for . (A guy named Chris Cohan bought the Golden State Warriors before the 1995 season for $119 million, guided the team to the playoffs exactly once over the next sixteen years, then sold the team for $450 million two summers ago.) It seems that what losses there are would have to be largely the result of individual owners’ incompetence. Despite all that, according to writer Tom Ziller, the league’s most recent offer calls for a permanent yearly cut to player salaries of either $240 million or $280 million, depending on which beat reporter’s version of the owners’ offer you’re using. The players, then, would be locked into essentially paying for 80-plus percent of the owners’ losses, which may not actually exist and, if they do, owe at least partly to the awfulness of an economy that will eventually improve. (It will!) Meanwhile, bear in mind that owners do not have to give out big contracts to bad players if they don’t want to. Any team losing money can cut payroll. And that won’t necessarily affect on-court performance, because, as always in sports as in life, you don’t have to spend the most to be the best: The Oklahoma City Thunder paid its players $58 million and won 55 games last year, while the Toronto Raptors paid $70 million and won 22 (financial data provided by ShamSports.com). So here’s what the owners are saying to the players: “We’ve made so many poor spending choices lately that we’ve lost money, even without having to pay for our own facilities and even as the NBA has grown more popular. And we’d like you to give up enough money to make it almost a certainty that we never lose money again, even if we make all these same mistakes for a second time and the economy never improves.”

Continue reading …