Home » Archives by category » News (Page 124)
Calls for Probe of Gadhafi’s Violent Death

Mounting calls for an investigation into whether Moammar Gadhafi was executed in custody overshadowed plans by Libya’s new rulers Sunday to declare liberation and a formal end to the eight-month civil war that toppled the longtime dictator. (Oct. 23)

Continue reading …
Calls for Probe of Gadhafi’s Violent Death

Mounting calls for an investigation into whether Moammar Gadhafi was executed in custody overshadowed plans by Libya’s new rulers Sunday to declare liberation and a formal end to the eight-month civil war that toppled the longtime dictator. (Oct. 23)

Continue reading …
Calls for Probe of Gadhafi’s Violent Death

Mounting calls for an investigation into whether Moammar Gadhafi was executed in custody overshadowed plans by Libya’s new rulers Sunday to declare liberation and a formal end to the eight-month civil war that toppled the longtime dictator. (Oct. 23)

Continue reading …
Sen. (R-SC) Lindsey Graham on Iraq Withdrawal: Obama ‘Failed’

Click here to view this media Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) says President Barack Obama has made a “serious mistake” by planning to withdraw all troops from Iraq by the end of the year. “I think in the last year he has made some very poor, dangerous foreign policy decisions at the strategic level,” Graham told Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sunday. “I would argue that Iraq and Afghanistan is being run out of Chicago — not Washington — in terms of decisions.” “What about the argument that in the last six months, bin Laden is gone, al-Awlaki is gone and now Gaddafi is gone?” Wallace asked. “I give him credit for making good tactical decisions, killing bin Laden,” Graham admitted. “Not being able to close the deal in Iraq is a very serious mistake. Celebrating leaving with no troops behind is a serious mistake… He’s put in question our success in Afghanistan and he ended Iraq poorly. He fumbled the ball inside of the ten. I hope I’m wrong about what happens in Iraq, but they are dancing in the streets in Tehran.” “This was a failure by the Obama administration to close the deal. The military commander said we needed 15,000 to 18,000 [troops in Iraq]. We have none. So, that’s the bottom line here. At a time when we need troops in Iraq to secure the place against intervention by Iran and the bad actors in the region, we’re going to go into 2012 with none. It was his job, the Obama administration’s job to end this well. They failed.” John Amato: The serious mistake was invading Iraq in the first place. Why is Goober Graham on my teevee, again after saying that the GOP opposed the Libya mission because Obama was president? Qaddafi was captured for like an hour when when Lindsey was drooling over how much money we could make off their oil and resources. I’m no fan of these wars and deaths and drones and military tribunals, but if you’re a right winger or Independent, you should be thrilled with the president’s actions so far in national security, so these phony attacks really come off as being very petty. The troops had to leave because the Iraq government wanted them out . And the American people are clearly against both wars so I ask, why is Graham on my TV? There’s nobody else that wants to do interviews?

Continue reading …
Sen. (R-SC) Lindsey Graham on Iraq Withdrawal: Obama ‘Failed’

Click here to view this media Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) says President Barack Obama has made a “serious mistake” by planning to withdraw all troops from Iraq by the end of the year. “I think in the last year he has made some very poor, dangerous foreign policy decisions at the strategic level,” Graham told Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sunday. “I would argue that Iraq and Afghanistan is being run out of Chicago — not Washington — in terms of decisions.” “What about the argument that in the last six months, bin Laden is gone, al-Awlaki is gone and now Gaddafi is gone?” Wallace asked. “I give him credit for making good tactical decisions, killing bin Laden,” Graham admitted. “Not being able to close the deal in Iraq is a very serious mistake. Celebrating leaving with no troops behind is a serious mistake… He’s put in question our success in Afghanistan and he ended Iraq poorly. He fumbled the ball inside of the ten. I hope I’m wrong about what happens in Iraq, but they are dancing in the streets in Tehran.” “This was a failure by the Obama administration to close the deal. The military commander said we needed 15,000 to 18,000 [troops in Iraq]. We have none. So, that’s the bottom line here. At a time when we need troops in Iraq to secure the place against intervention by Iran and the bad actors in the region, we’re going to go into 2012 with none. It was his job, the Obama administration’s job to end this well. They failed.” John Amato: The serious mistake was invading Iraq in the first place. Why is Goober Graham on my teevee, again after saying that the GOP opposed the Libya mission because Obama was president? Qaddafi was captured for like an hour when when Lindsey was drooling over how much money we could make off their oil and resources. I’m no fan of these wars and deaths and drones and military tribunals, but if you’re a right winger or Independent, you should be thrilled with the president’s actions so far in national security, so these phony attacks really come off as being very petty. The troops had to leave because the Iraq government wanted them out . And the American people are clearly against both wars so I ask, why is Graham on my TV? There’s nobody else that wants to do interviews?

Continue reading …
Sen. (R-SC) Lindsey Graham on Iraq Withdrawal: Obama ‘Failed’

Click here to view this media Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) says President Barack Obama has made a “serious mistake” by planning to withdraw all troops from Iraq by the end of the year. “I think in the last year he has made some very poor, dangerous foreign policy decisions at the strategic level,” Graham told Fox News’ Chris Wallace Sunday. “I would argue that Iraq and Afghanistan is being run out of Chicago — not Washington — in terms of decisions.” “What about the argument that in the last six months, bin Laden is gone, al-Awlaki is gone and now Gaddafi is gone?” Wallace asked. “I give him credit for making good tactical decisions, killing bin Laden,” Graham admitted. “Not being able to close the deal in Iraq is a very serious mistake. Celebrating leaving with no troops behind is a serious mistake… He’s put in question our success in Afghanistan and he ended Iraq poorly. He fumbled the ball inside of the ten. I hope I’m wrong about what happens in Iraq, but they are dancing in the streets in Tehran.” “This was a failure by the Obama administration to close the deal. The military commander said we needed 15,000 to 18,000 [troops in Iraq]. We have none. So, that’s the bottom line here. At a time when we need troops in Iraq to secure the place against intervention by Iran and the bad actors in the region, we’re going to go into 2012 with none. It was his job, the Obama administration’s job to end this well. They failed.” John Amato: The serious mistake was invading Iraq in the first place. Why is Goober Graham on my teevee, again after saying that the GOP opposed the Libya mission because Obama was president? Qaddafi was captured for like an hour when when Lindsey was drooling over how much money we could make off their oil and resources. I’m no fan of these wars and deaths and drones and military tribunals, but if you’re a right winger or Independent, you should be thrilled with the president’s actions so far in national security, so these phony attacks really come off as being very petty. The troops had to leave because the Iraq government wanted them out . And the American people are clearly against both wars so I ask, why is Graham on my TV? There’s nobody else that wants to do interviews?

Continue reading …
Mark Sanford Hired By Fox News: Former SC Governor To Become 2012 Election Commentator

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is joining Fox News as a political commentator through the 2012 presidential elections, a Fox Channel spokeswoman confirmed Saturday. The network spokeswoman told The Associated Press the two-term Republican governor has been hired as a contributor, though she declined to give any details on his pay or when he would start. Sanford was a rising political star before he vanished from the state for five days in 2009, and reporters were told he was hiking the Appalachian Trail. When he reappeared, the father of four admitted to being in Argentina with a woman he later called his soul mate. The international affair destroyed his marriage, which ended in divorce, and derailed his once-promising political career, which had included talk of presidential aspirations. Sanford faced impeachment hearings in 2009 after the state ethics commission looked into his use of state planes, campaign cash and first-class travel stemming from the affair. The GOP-dominated House issued a formal rebuke but did not impeach Sanford, who paid $74,000 in ethics fines and reimbursed the state for the investigation and for travel and personal expenses. But Sanford, a former congressman, remained well-regarded in conservative circles. He railed about spending, and his unwillingness to compromise with his fellow GOP leaders in the Legislature resulted in some very public disagreements. He once toted squirming, defecating piglets to the doors of the House to protest budget veto overrides. He also unsuccessfully sued the Legislature to bar the state from getting federal stimulus money. His persistent warnings about rising deficits and his opposition to federal mandates fed what would become tea party mantras. The term-limited Sanford has appeared on Fox since leaving office in January. In September, he told the Associated Press his interview with Sean Hannity was his way of slowly getting back to talking about the nation’s troubles. “I think this represents me sticking my toe back in the water and talking about things I care about,” he said then. “I care passionately about the direction of this country and deficit and debt and all the things that seem to be in vogue right now.” He reiterated that he had no intentions of getting back into politics, though he noted he’s learned “you never say never in life.” Sanford did not immediately return phone or e-mail messages Saturday. Sanford’s new job was first reported by The New York Times.

Continue reading …
Mark Sanford Hired By Fox News: Former SC Governor To Become 2012 Election Commentator

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is joining Fox News as a political commentator through the 2012 presidential elections, a Fox Channel spokeswoman confirmed Saturday. The network spokeswoman told The Associated Press the two-term Republican governor has been hired as a contributor, though she declined to give any details on his pay or when he would start. Sanford was a rising political star before he vanished from the state for five days in 2009, and reporters were told he was hiking the Appalachian Trail. When he reappeared, the father of four admitted to being in Argentina with a woman he later called his soul mate. The international affair destroyed his marriage, which ended in divorce, and derailed his once-promising political career, which had included talk of presidential aspirations. Sanford faced impeachment hearings in 2009 after the state ethics commission looked into his use of state planes, campaign cash and first-class travel stemming from the affair. The GOP-dominated House issued a formal rebuke but did not impeach Sanford, who paid $74,000 in ethics fines and reimbursed the state for the investigation and for travel and personal expenses. But Sanford, a former congressman, remained well-regarded in conservative circles. He railed about spending, and his unwillingness to compromise with his fellow GOP leaders in the Legislature resulted in some very public disagreements. He once toted squirming, defecating piglets to the doors of the House to protest budget veto overrides. He also unsuccessfully sued the Legislature to bar the state from getting federal stimulus money. His persistent warnings about rising deficits and his opposition to federal mandates fed what would become tea party mantras. The term-limited Sanford has appeared on Fox since leaving office in January. In September, he told the Associated Press his interview with Sean Hannity was his way of slowly getting back to talking about the nation’s troubles. “I think this represents me sticking my toe back in the water and talking about things I care about,” he said then. “I care passionately about the direction of this country and deficit and debt and all the things that seem to be in vogue right now.” He reiterated that he had no intentions of getting back into politics, though he noted he’s learned “you never say never in life.” Sanford did not immediately return phone or e-mail messages Saturday. Sanford’s new job was first reported by The New York Times.

Continue reading …
Mark Sanford Hired By Fox News: Former SC Governor To Become 2012 Election Commentator

COLUMBIA, S.C. — Former South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford is joining Fox News as a political commentator through the 2012 presidential elections, a Fox Channel spokeswoman confirmed Saturday. The network spokeswoman told The Associated Press the two-term Republican governor has been hired as a contributor, though she declined to give any details on his pay or when he would start. Sanford was a rising political star before he vanished from the state for five days in 2009, and reporters were told he was hiking the Appalachian Trail. When he reappeared, the father of four admitted to being in Argentina with a woman he later called his soul mate. The international affair destroyed his marriage, which ended in divorce, and derailed his once-promising political career, which had included talk of presidential aspirations. Sanford faced impeachment hearings in 2009 after the state ethics commission looked into his use of state planes, campaign cash and first-class travel stemming from the affair. The GOP-dominated House issued a formal rebuke but did not impeach Sanford, who paid $74,000 in ethics fines and reimbursed the state for the investigation and for travel and personal expenses. But Sanford, a former congressman, remained well-regarded in conservative circles. He railed about spending, and his unwillingness to compromise with his fellow GOP leaders in the Legislature resulted in some very public disagreements. He once toted squirming, defecating piglets to the doors of the House to protest budget veto overrides. He also unsuccessfully sued the Legislature to bar the state from getting federal stimulus money. His persistent warnings about rising deficits and his opposition to federal mandates fed what would become tea party mantras. The term-limited Sanford has appeared on Fox since leaving office in January. In September, he told the Associated Press his interview with Sean Hannity was his way of slowly getting back to talking about the nation’s troubles. “I think this represents me sticking my toe back in the water and talking about things I care about,” he said then. “I care passionately about the direction of this country and deficit and debt and all the things that seem to be in vogue right now.” He reiterated that he had no intentions of getting back into politics, though he noted he’s learned “you never say never in life.” Sanford did not immediately return phone or e-mail messages Saturday. Sanford’s new job was first reported by The New York Times.

Continue reading …
Sultan Bin Abdel Aziz, Heir To Saudi Throne, Dies

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia — Saudi Arabia’s ruling monarchy moved into a critical period of realignment Saturday after the death of the heir to the throne opened the way for a new crown prince: most likely a tough-talking interior minister who has led crackdowns on Islamic militants but also has shown favor to ultraconservative traditions such as keeping the ban on women voting. A state funeral is planned for Tuesday in Riyadh for crown prince Sultan bin Abdul-Aziz Al Saud, who died in New York at the age of 80 after an unspecified illness, the official Saudi Press Agency said. Now, Saudi rulers are expected to move quickly to name the new king-in-waiting – which royal protocol suggests will be Sultan’s half brother, Prince Nayef. Moving Nayef to the top of the succession ladder would not likely pose any risks to Saudi Arabia’s pro-Western policies and, in particular, its close alliance with Washington. But Nayef cuts a much more mercurial figure than Saudi’s current leader, the ailing King Abdullah, who has nudged ahead with reforms such as promising women voting rights in 2015 despite rumblings from the country’s powerful religious establishment. Nayef, 78, has earned U.S. praise for unleashing the internal security forces against suspected Islamic extremist cells in Saudi Arabia, which was home to 15 of 19 of the Sept. 11 hijackers. Yet he brought blistering rebukes in the West for a 2002 interview that quoted him as saying that “Zionists” – a reference to Jews – benefited from the 9-11 attacks because it turned world opinion against Islam and Arabs. Nayef also has expressed displeasure at some of Abdullah’s moves for more openness, saying in 2009 that he saw no need for women to vote or participate in politics. It’s a view shared by many Saudi clerics, who follow a strict brand of Islam known as Wahhabism. Their support gives the Saudi monarchy the legitimacy to rule over a nation holding Islam’s holiest sites. “Nayef is more religious, and is closer to the Saudi groups who are very critical of the king’s decisions regarding women and other steps he’s taken to balance out the rigid religious practices in society,” said Ali Fakhro, a political analyst and commentator in Bahrain. But it remains doubtful that Nayef – if ever made king – would outright annul Abdullah’s reforms, which include the establishment of a coed university where both genders can mix. More likely, Nayef would put any further changes on hold, said Abdulkhaleq Abdulla, a political affairs professor at Emirates University. “It’s not good news for Saudis or for the region,” he said. “(Nayef) is the security guy. He is the mukhabarat (secret police) guy. He is the internal affairs guy.” Although it’s not certain that Nayef will be selected to succeed Sultan, the signs point clearly in that direction. After Sultan fell ill two years ago, Nayef was named second deputy prime minister, traditionally the post right behind the crown prince. For the first time, however, the mechanism of picking the next No. 2 in the royal succession is not entirely clear. Traditionally, the king names his successor. But this time it is possible that Abdullah will put the decision to the Allegiance Council, a 33-member body composed of his brothers and cousins. Abdullah created the council as part of his reforms and gave it a mandate to choose the heir. Abdullah formed the council in order to modernize the process and give a wider voice. When it was created, it was decided that the council would choose the heir for the first time when Sultan rose to the throne, and his crown prince would need to be named. But it was not specified whether it would be used if Sultan died before the king. The choice of whether to convene the council now will likely be made by the 87-year-old Abdullah, who is currently recovering from his third operation to treat back problems in less than a year. “It is with deep sorrow and grief that the Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques King Abdullah mourns the loss of his brother and Crown Prince, His Royal Highness Prince Sultan,” the palace said in a statement announcing Sultan’s death. The announcement did not elaborate on his illness. According to a leaked U.S. diplomatic cable from January 2010, Sultan had been receiving treatment for colon cancer since 2009. Sultan was the kingdom’s defense minister in 1990 when U.S. forces deployed in Saudi Arabia to defend it against Iraqi forces that had overrun Kuwait. His son, Prince Khaled, served as the top Arab commander in the 1991 operation Desert Storm, in which U.S.-led troops drove the Iraqis out of Kuwait. As defense minister, Sultan closed multibillion-dollar deals to establish the modern Saudi armed forces, including land, air, naval and air defense forces. On more than one occasion, the deals implicated several of his sons in corruption scandals – charges they have denied. Sultan is survived by 32 children from multiple wives. They include Bandar, the former ambassador to the United States who now heads the National Security Council, and Khaled, Sultan’s assistant in the Defense Ministry. U.S. President Barack Obama called the prince “a valued friend of the United States” in a statement of condolence. “He was a strong supporter of the deep and enduring partnership between our two countries forged almost seven decades ago.” “He will be missed,” said U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton during a visit to Tajikistan. “Our relationship with Saudi Arabia is strong and enduring and we will look forward to working with the leadership for many years to come.” Britain’s foreign secretary, William Hague, said Sultan served his country with “great dignity and dedication.” Saudi Arabia has been ruled since 1953 by the sons of its founder, King Abdul-Aziz, who had more than 40 sons by multiple wives. Sultan was part of the aging second generation of Abdul-Aziz’s sons, including Nayef, the full brother of the late King Fahd, who died in 2005. While Nayef has taken only minor roles in foreign affairs, he has been outspoken in one of Saudi Arabia’s chief regional concerns: ambitions by rival Iran to expand its influence in the Middle East. Earlier this year, he blamed the Shiite power for encouraging protests among Saudi Arabia’s minority Shiites. Nayef also was involved in the kingdom’s decision in March to send military forces into neighboring Bahrain to help crush pro-reform demonstrations led by tiny island nation’s majority Shiites against its Sunni rulers – which Gulf Arab leaders accuse of having ties to Iran. With Yemen, he has called for Saudi Arabia to take a harder line with embattled President Ali Abdullah Saleh, who was treated in Saudi Arabia after surviving a blast in June and later returned to Yemen. In August, Nayef accepted undisclosed libel damages from Britain’s newspaper The Independent over an article which accused him of ordering police chiefs to shoot and kill unarmed demonstrators in Saudi Arabia. Nayef has chaired Cabinet meetings in place of Abdullah and Sultan. He also draws considerable prestige from being among the sons of Abdul-Aziz’s most prominent wife, known as the Sudeiri Seven. Abdullah’s predecessor Fahd also was among the seven. “Nayef’s closer links to the Wahhabi establishment may see a reversal of some recent reforms, especially regarding women,” said Christopher Davidson, a lecturer at Britain’s Durham University and an expert on Gulf affairs. “But more likely business as usual, I think, with no further major reforms.” ___ Murphy reported from Dubai, United Arab Emirates. Associated Press writers Maggie Michael in Cairo and Barbara Surk in Manama, Bahrain, contributed to this report.

Continue reading …