Skins Isn’t Kiddie Porn, It’s Just Lame

First things first: The MTV teen drama Skins doesn’t dabble in child pornography, writes Jace Lacob in the Daily Beast. The scene in question featuring a teen boy’s naked butt isn’t even “remotely sexually suggestive,” he writes, and thus doesn’t meet the criteria for breaking indecency rules. (See for yourself—…

See the rest here:
Skins Isn’t Kiddie Porn, It’s Just Lame

Posted by on January 22, 2011. Filed under News, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry