Badger cull: Caroline Spelman ‘strongly minded’ to allow shooting

Environment secretary says farmers will be allowed to kill badgers if pilot schemes confirm shooting is humane and effective A controversial cull of England’s badgers was announced at lunchtime on Tuesday in parliament, when the environment secretary told MPs she was “strongly minded” to allow farmers to shoot badgers in a controlled fashion. Animal campaigners reacted furiously, and are likely to mount a legal challenge to the plans, but farming representatives welcomed the proposals. Caroline Spelman said the cull was needed to bring down the rates of infection of tuberculosis in cattle. “This is a comprehensive, balanced set of measures to tackle this terrible disease,” she said. She announced that two pilots would take place to confirm that controlled shooting would be humane and effective, and the government would consult on licensing. Once this stage is complete and, if it is deemed successful, farmers would be able to apply for licences to shoot badgers under strict limits on how it can be carried out. The location of the pilots has not yet been decided. Peter Kendall, president of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU), said farmers “would heave an enormous sigh of relief”. Many farmers have been calling for a cull for more than a decade, as TB infection rates in cattle have risen rapidly, with the west and south-west of England worst affected. Badgers, though not endangered, are a protected species, and the efficacy of a cull in protecting cattle from TB is widely contested. Lord Krebs, who as a government adviser in 1997 was the architect of a 10-year experimental cull, recently rejected culling as “ineffective” . He said other measures would be more productive, such as improved security for cattle to prevent them coming into contact with badgers, and the use of a vaccine when one becomes readily available. Culling badgers, according to the trials, resulted in a 16% reduction in “confirmed new incidence” of TB in cattle herds – an outcome that farming leaders and the secretary of state hailed as a useful strategy, but that Krebs said was not enough to justify a widespread cull. He said: “You cull intensively for at least four years, you will have a net benefit of reducing TB in cattle of 12% to 16%. So you leave 85% of the problem still there, having gone to a huge amount of trouble to kill a huge number of badgers. It doesn’t seem to me an effective way of controlling the disease.” However, the NFU favours a cull, citing evidence from Ireland, where experimental culls have been allowed, and from Australia and New Zealand, where culls of other wild animals have been credited with reducing disease rates. Bovine TB causes £90m of damage annually, with affected farmers forced to discard milk, meat and other products from infected beasts, and sometimes to abandon livestock farming altogether. The worst affected areas are in the south-west of England and Wales, but “hotspots” for the disease occur around the country. Under the plans, farmers would be allowed to kill badgers using “free shooting”. This would mean trained marksmen targeting badgers, a method that would be paid for by farmers and is likely to be cheaper than the alternative of trapping and killing badgers. Farming leaders said free shooting would enable groups of farmers and landowners to club together to target areas of at least 150 sq km, the minimum to be allowed under any new culling rules, and they would only be granted a licence if it can be proven the area is a TB “hotspot”. Badgers Bovine tuberculosis Rural affairs Animals Wildlife Conservation Green politics Farming Fiona Harvey guardian.co.uk

Posted by on July 19, 2011. Filed under News, Politics, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.