Cancel Lord Monckton’s university lecture, say academics

In an open letter to the University of Notre Dame, signatories say the climate sceptic stands for ‘ignorance and superstition’ Academics in Australia are calling for the University of Notre Dame in Fremantle to cancel a lecture due to be given by the prominent climate sceptic Lord Monckton on Thursday. In a letter seen by the Guardian, which is currently being circulated among academics, the undersigned say that Monckton “stands for the kind of ignorance and superstition that universities have a duty to counter” and “Notre Dame has a responsibility to avoid promoting discredited views on an issue of public risk”. Signatories already supporting the open letter include professors and lecturers across Australia, but also academics in the UK and US. The letter, which is addressed “from the Australian academic community” to Notre Dame, a Catholic university in Western Australia, was originally drafted by Natalie Latter , a political science postgraduate student at the University of Western Australia . The letter says Monckton’s lecture is particularly unwelcome in light of recent death threats made against Australian climate scientists. “Lord Monckton propounds widely discredited fictions about climate change and misrepresents the research of countless scientists,” says the letter. “With zero peer-reviewed publications, he has declared that the scientific enterprise is invalid and that climate science is fraudulent … Over the last month there has been a great deal of coverage in the Australian media of the death threats and abusive emails that have targeted Australian scientists working on climate change. These threats are fuelled by misinformation spread by figures like Lord Monckton and the distorted coverage that they receive in the Australian media. As academics, we expect our universities to support us against this kind of abuse. We expect our universities to foster academic standards of conduct and argument.” The letter continues: “We all support academic freedom and the freedom to express our ideas and beliefs … [However] Notre Dame’s invitation to Lord Monckton makes a mockery of academic standards and the pursuit of evidence-based knowledge.” Monckton, the deputy leader of the UK Independence party , apologised over the weekend for remarks he made this month during a lecture in Los Angeles in which he likened Prof Ross Garnaut , a climate change adviser to the Australian government, to a Nazi, while showing a slide of a large swastika next to one of Garnaut’s quotes. In online footage of the speech, Monckton can be heard saying in a mock German accent, “Heil Hitler, on we go” when referring to Garnaut. The comment drew criticism from across the Australian political spectrum last week. Julia Gillard, the prime minister, condemned the comments as ” offensive and grossly inappropriate “. Tony Abbott, the opposition leader who is fighting to stop the government’s proposed carbon tax and who is scheduled to attend a mining conference in Perth at which Monckton is due to speak, described the comments as ” over the top “. During a television interview on Sunday, Monckton apologised to Garnaut “for having made the point I was trying to make in such a catastrophically stupid and offensive way”. He added: “I have written to him to withdraw that unreservedly.” It is not the first time Monckton has been criticised for making such remarks. In 2009, at the Copenhagen climate summit , he described a group of young climate activists as ” Hitler youth “. Monckton is scheduled to begin a three-week lecture tour of Australia on Thursday when he addresses the annual conference of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies in Perth. The organisers have confirmed that Monckton is still scheduled to speak, despite the controversy over his remarks. Later that day, he will deliver the Lang Hancock lecture at Notre Dame, a lecture series sponsored by Hancock Prospecting , a mining company owned by Australia’s richest person, Gina Rinehart. Chris Doepel, the university’s dean of business, has confirmed some invited conference guests have also called for Monckton’s speech to be cancelled, but he insisted the event will go ahead. “The university will hold it because we have a commitment to academic freedom,” he told local media over the weekend. “I think Lord Monckton is coming into this country with a clear understanding of the boundaries around polite discussion.” Doepel added that there is no plan to censor Monckton’s presentation and that the 200-strong audience will be free to ask questions. Not all of Australia’s academic community believes Monckton should be censored or barred from speaking, however. Prof Ian Chubb , Australia’s chief scientist, told the Guardian: “I think that we have to put up with deplorable people if we value our democracy. And we do. So I couldn’t argue that action should be taken, though I find his comments as outrageous as his abuse of science. I don’t think making him some sort of victim would serve any purpose, other than to add to the weight of his wallet. There will always be people somewhere in the world who will pay to hear people like him; and enhancing his celebrity through censorship will encourage more of them to pay. He just needs to be exposed for what he is.” Anna-Maria Arabia, the CEO of Science & Technology Australia , which recently organised the Respect the Science event in Canberra in which 200 scientists marched to show solidarity for climate scientists receiving death threats, also feels that Monckton should be free to speak: “Everyone is entitled to their views, but it is important that personal views are differentiated from the scientific evidence that has been through the rigorous peer-review process. The challenge for Lord Monckton is to have his ideas tested through the peer review process.” She added: “The misinformation campaign designed to create fear and uncertainty will not intimidate climate scientists who dedicate their lives to the pursuit of knowledge and know the importance of placing their results in the public domain so that fair and democratic debate can ensue. Critical decisions about making the world we live in a better and safer place must be informed by the best possible information we have, not by fear. The best possible information we have is the peer-reviewed science.” After visiting Fremantle, Monckton is scheduled to speak at venues across Australia, including the German Club in Adelaide. Last week, Elke Pfau , the club’s president said she was “looking into” the booking following Monckton’s “unfortunate” remarks about Garnaut. In April, a private school near Brisbane cancelled a business event due to feature Monckton next month after the head teacher deemed his participation to be “too controversial” . Monckton’s lecture tour is being co-ordinated by the Climate Sceptics party , a political party set up in 2009 by an Australian farmer to “expose the fallacy of anthropogenic climate change”. • This article was amended on Monday 27 June 2011. It originally stated that Lord Monckton was scheduled to begin a three-week lecture tour of Australia at a mining conference hosted by Notre Dame. The Notre Dame Lang Hancock lecture in fact takes place later on the same day he begins his lecture tour at the annual conference of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies in Perth. This has been changed. Climate change scepticism Climate change Climate change Australia Leo Hickman guardian.co.uk

Posted by on June 27, 2011. Filed under News, Politics, World News. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.