It’s true that George Eliot and Charlotte Bronte used male pen names so that their work would be taken seriously (and so they could publish at all). But as I learned while researching my new book, “Nom de Plume: A (Secret) History of Pseudonyms,” the motives behind this tradition are often more complicated and mysterious than you might imagine. I learned that pen names are not merely functional–they are often bound up in profound ways with a writer’s creativity and identity, not to mention issues of guilt and shame. There are more than a few good reasons (and sometimes many at once) to adopt a nom de plume.
Posted by
on June 20, 2011. Filed under News.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.